Iulian Prutianu, Simona Eliza Giuşcă, Bogdan Gafton, Mariana Bianca Chifu, Cristina Terinte, Alexandra Antonescu, Larisa Popovici, Irina Draga Căruntu
{"title":"Triple-negative breast cancer: from classical clinicopathological features to androgen receptor profile.","authors":"Iulian Prutianu, Simona Eliza Giuşcă, Bogdan Gafton, Mariana Bianca Chifu, Cristina Terinte, Alexandra Antonescu, Larisa Popovici, Irina Draga Căruntu","doi":"10.47162/RJME.65.2.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Triple-negative breast cancer (BC) represents an extensively analyzed entity to establish the overall framework of clinicopathological characteristics, with an impact on defining prognostic and predictive factors. The relationship between triple-negative BC and androgen receptor (AR) is far from being clarified. We aimed to evaluate the classical clinicopathological spectrum that characterized a triple-negative BC, focusing on AR expression. The study group comprised 124 cases of triple-negative BC. The main clinicopathological parameters were extracted from medical records. The immunohistochemical (IHC) exam was run using the following antibodies: anti-estrogen receptor (ER), anti-progesterone receptor (PR), anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2∕neu), anti-Ki67 and anti-AR. AR immunoexpression was assessed as absent (completely negative) or present (unrelated to percentages and intensity). Data were statistically analyzed. AR expression was positive in 78 (63%) cases and negative in 46 (37%) cases. Among the study group, 28 cases exhibited an AR percentage ranging from 1% to 10%, 15 cases showed a percentage between 11% and 50%, while 12 cases had AR values between 51% and 75% and 23 cases fell within the AR range of 76% to 100%. No significant differences between AR immunoexpression (negative versus positive), clinicopathological characteristics and survival parameters were found. Statistically significant differences were registered between histological type, tumor stage, distant metastasis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), treatment and residual cancer burden (RCB), and survival parameters. Thus, our results sustain that AR does not affect the biological behavior of triple-negative BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54447,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology","volume":"65 2","pages":"209-216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47162/RJME.65.2.07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (BC) represents an extensively analyzed entity to establish the overall framework of clinicopathological characteristics, with an impact on defining prognostic and predictive factors. The relationship between triple-negative BC and androgen receptor (AR) is far from being clarified. We aimed to evaluate the classical clinicopathological spectrum that characterized a triple-negative BC, focusing on AR expression. The study group comprised 124 cases of triple-negative BC. The main clinicopathological parameters were extracted from medical records. The immunohistochemical (IHC) exam was run using the following antibodies: anti-estrogen receptor (ER), anti-progesterone receptor (PR), anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2∕neu), anti-Ki67 and anti-AR. AR immunoexpression was assessed as absent (completely negative) or present (unrelated to percentages and intensity). Data were statistically analyzed. AR expression was positive in 78 (63%) cases and negative in 46 (37%) cases. Among the study group, 28 cases exhibited an AR percentage ranging from 1% to 10%, 15 cases showed a percentage between 11% and 50%, while 12 cases had AR values between 51% and 75% and 23 cases fell within the AR range of 76% to 100%. No significant differences between AR immunoexpression (negative versus positive), clinicopathological characteristics and survival parameters were found. Statistically significant differences were registered between histological type, tumor stage, distant metastasis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), treatment and residual cancer burden (RCB), and survival parameters. Thus, our results sustain that AR does not affect the biological behavior of triple-negative BC.
三阴性乳腺癌(BC)是一个被广泛分析的实体,其临床病理特征的整体框架对确定预后和预测因素具有重要影响。三阴性乳腺癌与雄激素受体(AR)之间的关系远未明确。我们的目的是评估三阴性 BC 的经典临床病理特征,重点关注 AR 的表达。研究组包括124例三阴性BC。主要临床病理参数来自病历。使用以下抗体进行免疫组化(IHC)检查:抗雌激素受体(ER)、抗孕酮受体(PR)、抗人表皮生长因子受体(HER2∕neu)、抗Ki67和抗AR。AR免疫表达被评估为不存在(完全阴性)或存在(与百分比和强度无关)。对数据进行了统计分析。78例(63%)AR表达阳性,46例(37%)阴性。在研究组中,28 个病例的 AR 百分比在 1%-10%之间,15 个病例的 AR 百分比在 11%-50%之间,12 个病例的 AR 值在 51%-75%之间,23 个病例的 AR 值在 76%-100%之间。AR免疫表达(阴性与阳性)、临床病理特征和生存参数之间没有发现明显差异。组织学类型、肿瘤分期、远处转移、肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)、治疗和残余癌负荷(RCB)与生存参数之间存在统计学意义上的差异。因此,我们的研究结果表明,AR 不会影响三阴性 BC 的生物学行为。
期刊介绍:
Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology (Rom J Morphol Embryol) publishes studies on all aspects of normal morphology and human comparative and experimental pathology. The Journal accepts only researches that utilize modern investigation methods (studies of anatomy, pathology, cytopathology, immunohistochemistry, histochemistry, immunology, morphometry, molecular and cellular biology, electronic microscopy, etc.).