Monitoring and integrated care coordination of patients with alpha-mannosidosis: A global Delphi consensus study

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Molecular genetics and metabolism Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ymgme.2024.108519
{"title":"Monitoring and integrated care coordination of patients with alpha-mannosidosis: A global Delphi consensus study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ymgme.2024.108519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Current literature lacks consensus on initial assessments and routine follow-up care of patients with alpha-mannosidosis (AM). A Delphi panel was conducted to generate and validate recommendations on best practices for initial assessment, routine follow-up care, and integrated care coordination of patients with AM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A modified Delphi method involving 3 rounds of online surveys was used. An independent administrator and 2 nonvoting physician co-chairs managed survey development, anonymous data collection, and analysis. A multidisciplinary panel comprising 20 physicians from 12 countries responded to 57 open-ended questions in the first survey. Round 2 consisted of 11 ranking questions and 44 voting statements. In round 3, panelists voted to validate 60 consensus statements. The panel response rate was ≥95% in all 3 rounds. Panelists used 5-point Likert scales to indicate importance (score of ≥3) or agreement (score of ≥4). Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% agreement with ≥75% of panelists voting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Consensus was reached on 60 statements, encompassing 3 key areas: initial assessments, routine follow-up care, and treatment-related follow-up. The panel agreed on the type and frequency of assessments related to genetic testing, baseline evaluations, quality of life, biochemical measures, affected body systems, treatment received, and integrated care coordination in patients with AM. Forty-nine statements reached 90% to 100% consensus, 8 statements reached 80% to 85% consensus, and 1 statement reached 75% consensus. Two statements each reached consensus on 15 baseline assessments to be conducted at the initial follow-up visit after diagnosis in pediatric and adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This is the first Delphi study providing internationally applicable, best-practice recommendations for monitoring patients with AM that may improve their care and well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18937,"journal":{"name":"Molecular genetics and metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096719224004037/pdfft?md5=5d5280cbc09ebe24d277bea8a9f2b27b&pid=1-s2.0-S1096719224004037-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular genetics and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096719224004037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Current literature lacks consensus on initial assessments and routine follow-up care of patients with alpha-mannosidosis (AM). A Delphi panel was conducted to generate and validate recommendations on best practices for initial assessment, routine follow-up care, and integrated care coordination of patients with AM.

Methods

A modified Delphi method involving 3 rounds of online surveys was used. An independent administrator and 2 nonvoting physician co-chairs managed survey development, anonymous data collection, and analysis. A multidisciplinary panel comprising 20 physicians from 12 countries responded to 57 open-ended questions in the first survey. Round 2 consisted of 11 ranking questions and 44 voting statements. In round 3, panelists voted to validate 60 consensus statements. The panel response rate was ≥95% in all 3 rounds. Panelists used 5-point Likert scales to indicate importance (score of ≥3) or agreement (score of ≥4). Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% agreement with ≥75% of panelists voting.

Results

Consensus was reached on 60 statements, encompassing 3 key areas: initial assessments, routine follow-up care, and treatment-related follow-up. The panel agreed on the type and frequency of assessments related to genetic testing, baseline evaluations, quality of life, biochemical measures, affected body systems, treatment received, and integrated care coordination in patients with AM. Forty-nine statements reached 90% to 100% consensus, 8 statements reached 80% to 85% consensus, and 1 statement reached 75% consensus. Two statements each reached consensus on 15 baseline assessments to be conducted at the initial follow-up visit after diagnosis in pediatric and adult patients.

Conclusion

This is the first Delphi study providing internationally applicable, best-practice recommendations for monitoring patients with AM that may improve their care and well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对α-甘露糖苷酶病患者进行监测和综合护理协调:全球德尔菲共识研究
导言:目前的文献对α-甘露糖苷酶症(AM)患者的初步评估和常规随访护理缺乏共识。我们成立了一个德尔菲小组,就 AM 患者的初始评估、常规随访护理和综合护理协调的最佳实践提出建议并进行验证。一名独立管理员和两名无投票权的医生共同主持调查的开发、匿名数据收集和分析。由来自 12 个国家的 20 名医生组成的多学科小组回答了第一轮调查中的 57 个开放式问题。第二轮调查包括 11 个排名问题和 44 个投票声明。在第三轮调查中,专家小组成员投票确认了 60 项共识声明。在所有 3 轮调查中,专家小组的回复率均≥95%。专家组成员使用 5 分李克特量表来表示重要性(得分≥3)或同意(得分≥4)。共识的先验定义是≥75%的专家组成员投票同意≥75%。结果就 60 项声明达成共识,包括 3 个关键领域:初始评估、常规随访护理和治疗相关随访。专家小组就 AM 患者基因检测、基线评估、生活质量、生化指标、受影响的身体系统、接受的治疗和综合护理协调等相关评估的类型和频率达成了一致意见。49项声明达成了90%至100%的共识,8项声明达成了80%至85%的共识,1项声明达成了75%的共识。两项声明分别就儿童和成人患者确诊后首次随访时应进行的 15 项基线评估达成了共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular genetics and metabolism
Molecular genetics and metabolism 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
621
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Molecular Genetics and Metabolism contributes to the understanding of the metabolic and molecular basis of disease. This peer reviewed journal publishes articles describing investigations that use the tools of biochemical genetics and molecular genetics for studies of normal and disease states in humans and animal models.
期刊最新文献
Cover 2 / Ed. Board cPMP rescue of a neonate with severe molybdenum cofactor deficiency after serendipitous early diagnosis, and characterisation of a novel MOCS1 variant Progressive liver disease and dysregulated glycogen metabolism in murine GSD IX γ2 models human disease Multi-omic analysis of a mucolipidosis II neuronal cell model uncovers involvement of pathways related to neurodegeneration and drug metabolism The role of NMDA-receptor type glutamatergic antagonists dextromethorphan or ketamine in the treatment of nonketotic hyperglycinemia: A critical reassessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1