Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained by echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and radial acquisition regime DWI in low field MRI systems: A phantom study

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.005
{"title":"Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained by echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and radial acquisition regime DWI in low field MRI systems: A phantom study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with radial acquisition regime (RADAR; RADAR-DWI) is a fast spin echo (FSE)–based DWI imaging technique that is known to be robust to magnetic susceptibility artifacts and distortions as compared with echo planar imaging DWI (EPI-DWI). Several reports have suggested that the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained with FSE-based DWI are different from those obtained with EPI-DWI. The purpose of this study was to create phantoms that mimic the T<sub>2</sub> and ADC values of various tissues and to demonstrate the ADC values obtained with RADAR-DWI and EPI-DWI in low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Several phantoms were created using sucrose and manganese (II) chloride tetrahydrate mimicking various tissues. RADAR-DWI and EPI-DWI were used to scan the phantoms, and the obtained ADC values were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ADC values obtained with RADAR-DWI were significantly higher than those obtained with EPI-DWI for all phantoms (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The ADC values obtained by RADAR-DWI ranged from 0.70 ± 0.01 to 1.21 ± 0.02 ( × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>). Meanwhile, the ADC values obtained with EPI-DWI ranged from 0.59 ± 0.01 to 1.08 ± 0.05 ( × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We created phantoms mimicking T<sub>2</sub> and ADC values of various tissues and demonstrated the differences in ADC values obtained with RADAR-DWI and EPI-DWI using low-field MRI systems.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>ADC values obtained by RADAR-DWI are significantly higher than those obtained by EPI-DWI, with different cutoff values for various tumor malignancies between them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with radial acquisition regime (RADAR; RADAR-DWI) is a fast spin echo (FSE)–based DWI imaging technique that is known to be robust to magnetic susceptibility artifacts and distortions as compared with echo planar imaging DWI (EPI-DWI). Several reports have suggested that the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained with FSE-based DWI are different from those obtained with EPI-DWI. The purpose of this study was to create phantoms that mimic the T2 and ADC values of various tissues and to demonstrate the ADC values obtained with RADAR-DWI and EPI-DWI in low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems.

Methods

Several phantoms were created using sucrose and manganese (II) chloride tetrahydrate mimicking various tissues. RADAR-DWI and EPI-DWI were used to scan the phantoms, and the obtained ADC values were compared.

Results

The ADC values obtained with RADAR-DWI were significantly higher than those obtained with EPI-DWI for all phantoms (P < 0.05). The ADC values obtained by RADAR-DWI ranged from 0.70 ± 0.01 to 1.21 ± 0.02 ( × 10−3mm2s−1). Meanwhile, the ADC values obtained with EPI-DWI ranged from 0.59 ± 0.01 to 1.08 ± 0.05 ( × 10−3mm2s−1).

Conclusions

We created phantoms mimicking T2 and ADC values of various tissues and demonstrated the differences in ADC values obtained with RADAR-DWI and EPI-DWI using low-field MRI systems.

Implications for practice

ADC values obtained by RADAR-DWI are significantly higher than those obtained by EPI-DWI, with different cutoff values for various tumor malignancies between them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在低磁场核磁共振成像系统中通过回波平面成像扩散加权成像(DWI)和径向采集系统 DWI 获得的表观扩散系数(ADC)值的比较:模型研究
导言:具有径向采集机制(RADAR;RADAR-DWI)的扩散加权成像(DWI)是一种基于快速自旋回波(FSE)的 DWI 成像技术,与回波平面成像 DWI(EPI-DWI)相比,它对磁感应伪影和畸变具有很强的鲁棒性。一些报告指出,基于 FSE 的 DWI 所获得的表观扩散系数(ADC)值与基于 EPI-DWI 的表观扩散系数(ADC)值不同。本研究的目的是制作模拟各种组织 T2 和 ADC 值的模型,并展示在低场磁共振成像(MRI)系统中使用 RADAR-DWI 和 EPI-DWI 获得的 ADC 值。结果在所有模型中,RADAR-DWI 和 EPI-DWI 扫描得到的 ADC 值都明显高于 EPI-DWI 扫描得到的 ADC 值(P <0.05)。RADAR-DWI 获得的 ADC 值范围为 0.70 ± 0.01 至 1.21 ± 0.02 ( × 10-3mm2s-1)。结论我们创建了模拟各种组织 T2 和 ADC 值的模型,并证明了使用低场 MRI 系统的 RADAR-DWI 和 EPI-DWI 所获得的 ADC 值的差异。对实践的启示RADAR-DWI获得的ADC值明显高于EPI-DWI获得的ADC值,两者对各种恶性肿瘤的临界值不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
An enquiry into the usefulness of an information portal for Deaf and hard of hearing people prior to x-ray examinations and improvement ideas Morphometry-based radiomics for predicting prognosis in soft tissue sarcomas of extremities following radiotherapy Virtual reality simulation for mastery learning of wrist radiograph technique An initial exploration of factors that may impact radiographer performance in reporting mammograms Diagnostic radiography workforce expectations of learners against the 2023 HCPC standards of proficiency: Results of a UK Delphi study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1