Seismic analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls in tiered configuration

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geotextiles and Geomembranes Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.07.004
{"title":"Seismic analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls in tiered configuration","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls in tiered configurations is increasing gaining attention, with numerical methods being predominantly used in the past. In recent years, there has been a growing trend in conducting shaking table tests to further explore this area. However, traditional limit equilibrium (LE) methods are more preferred for design purposes. This study utilized a modified top-down approach, which is based on LE and pseudo-static methods to investigate the horizontal seismic force on the distribution of required tension along each reinforcement layer. The approach is initially extended from static analysis to seismic analysis for multitiered GRS walls. Parametric analyses are conducted to study the impacts that horizontal seismic coefficient, reinforcement length and spacing, internal friction angle of soil, height ratio of upper/lower tier, offset distance have on the internal stability of two-tiered GRS walls. Meanwhile, influences of wall batter and number of tiers on the critical offset distance for different seismic coefficients are assessed. Results indicate that the internal stability differs between the upper and lower tiers under seismic conditions, particularly with higher seismic forces, where the lower tier requires greater reinforcement tension to enhance its stability. Additionally, the critical offset distance grows with the increase in seismic coefficient, and it is sensitive to the internal friction angle of soil and the height ratio.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424000700","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls in tiered configurations is increasing gaining attention, with numerical methods being predominantly used in the past. In recent years, there has been a growing trend in conducting shaking table tests to further explore this area. However, traditional limit equilibrium (LE) methods are more preferred for design purposes. This study utilized a modified top-down approach, which is based on LE and pseudo-static methods to investigate the horizontal seismic force on the distribution of required tension along each reinforcement layer. The approach is initially extended from static analysis to seismic analysis for multitiered GRS walls. Parametric analyses are conducted to study the impacts that horizontal seismic coefficient, reinforcement length and spacing, internal friction angle of soil, height ratio of upper/lower tier, offset distance have on the internal stability of two-tiered GRS walls. Meanwhile, influences of wall batter and number of tiers on the critical offset distance for different seismic coefficients are assessed. Results indicate that the internal stability differs between the upper and lower tiers under seismic conditions, particularly with higher seismic forces, where the lower tier requires greater reinforcement tension to enhance its stability. Additionally, the critical offset distance grows with the increase in seismic coefficient, and it is sensitive to the internal friction angle of soil and the height ratio.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分层配置的土工合成材料加固土墙的抗震分析
有关分层配置的土工合成材料加固土墙(GRS)的研究日益受到重视,过去主要采用数值方法。近年来,进行振动台试验以进一步探索这一领域的趋势日益明显。然而,传统的极限平衡(LE)方法在设计中更受青睐。本研究采用了一种改进的自顶向下方法,该方法基于极限平衡法和伪静力法,用于研究水平地震力对各加固层所需拉力分布的影响。该方法最初从静力分析扩展到多层 GRS 墙体的地震分析。通过参数分析,研究了水平地震系数、钢筋长度和间距、土壤内摩擦角、上下层高度比、偏移距离对两层 GRS 墙内部稳定性的影响。同时,还评估了不同地震系数下墙体抗压强度和层数对临界偏移距离的影响。结果表明,在地震条件下,上层和下层的内部稳定性不同,特别是在地震力较大时,下层需要更大的加固拉力来增强其稳定性。此外,临界偏移距离随着地震系数的增大而增大,并且对土壤的内摩擦角和高度比很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Tensile behavior of needle-punched nonwoven geotextiles based on in-situ X-ray computed tomography and numerical simulation Research on the aging mechanism of polypropylene nonwoven geotextiles under simulated heavy metal aging scenarios Analytical model of three-dimensional concentric ellipsoidal soil arching in geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments Dynamic response and damage of pile-geogrid composite reinforced high-speed railway subgrade under seismic actions Parameters affecting performance of fully instrumented model testing of strip footings on geocell-reinforced soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1