Institutional, economic and cultural safeguards against corruption: a panel study of OECD countries

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Financial Crime Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1108/jfc-02-2024-0082
Sandra Cunha, P. Camões
{"title":"Institutional, economic and cultural safeguards against corruption: a panel study of OECD countries","authors":"Sandra Cunha, P. Camões","doi":"10.1108/jfc-02-2024-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to ascertain whether the combination of anti-corruption measures, with simultaneous impact on the institutional, economic and cultural dimensions, is associated with lower levels of corruption.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors have developed a research that seeks to find statistical evidence of the relationship between levels of corruption and combinations of anti-corruption measures. To test the hypotheses, the authors performed panel regression analysis using different panel estimation methods, namely, fixed effects (FE) models.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results do not fully support the idea that the combination of anti-corruption measures with simultaneous impact on the institutional, economic and cultural dimensions has more impact on corruption levels than other measures taken singly, but rather that the most determining factor in preventing corruption lies in government effectiveness.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe relevance of this study lies in the shortcomings of this type of research applied to anti-corruption measures. Moreover, the development of panel data analysis makes it possible to approach the phenomenon from a double perspective, over time and in comparative terms between different countries, incorporating non-immediate effects and possible interactive effects between different anti-corruption measures.\n","PeriodicalId":38940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Crime","volume":"29 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Crime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-02-2024-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to ascertain whether the combination of anti-corruption measures, with simultaneous impact on the institutional, economic and cultural dimensions, is associated with lower levels of corruption. Design/methodology/approach The authors have developed a research that seeks to find statistical evidence of the relationship between levels of corruption and combinations of anti-corruption measures. To test the hypotheses, the authors performed panel regression analysis using different panel estimation methods, namely, fixed effects (FE) models. Findings The results do not fully support the idea that the combination of anti-corruption measures with simultaneous impact on the institutional, economic and cultural dimensions has more impact on corruption levels than other measures taken singly, but rather that the most determining factor in preventing corruption lies in government effectiveness. Originality/value The relevance of this study lies in the shortcomings of this type of research applied to anti-corruption measures. Moreover, the development of panel data analysis makes it possible to approach the phenomenon from a double perspective, over time and in comparative terms between different countries, incorporating non-immediate effects and possible interactive effects between different anti-corruption measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反腐败的制度、经济和文化保障:经合组织国家小组研究
本文旨在确定同时对制度、经济和文化层面产生影响的反腐败措施组合是否与较低的腐败水平相关联。为了验证假设,作者使用不同的面板估算方法,即固定效应(FE)模型,进行了面板回归分析。研究结果研究结果并不完全支持以下观点,即同时影响制度、经济和文化层面的反腐败措施组合比其他单一措施对腐败水平的影响更大,相反,预防腐败的最大决定性因素在于政府的有效性。此外,面板数据分析的发展使我们有可能从双重视角,即从时间和不同国家之间的比较角度来研究这一现象,将非即时效应和不同反腐败措施之间可能存在的互动效应纳入其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Crime
Journal of Financial Crime Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Crime, the leading journal in this field, publishes authoritative, practical and detailed insight in the most serious and topical issues relating to the control and prevention of financial crime and related abuse. The journal''s articles are authored by some of the leading international scholars and practitioners in the fields of law, criminology, economics, criminal justice and compliance. Consequently, articles are perceptive, evidence based and have policy impact. The journal covers a wide range of current topics including, but not limited to: • Tracing through the civil law of the proceeds of fraud • Cyber-crime: prevention and detection • Intelligence led investigations • Whistleblowing and the payment of rewards for information • Identity fraud • Insider dealing prosecutions • Specialised anti-corruption investigations • Underground banking systems • Asset tracing and forfeiture • Securities regulation and enforcement • Tax regimes and tax avoidance • Deferred prosecution agreements • Personal liability of compliance managers and professional advisers
期刊最新文献
Corporate criminal liability and the identification principle: a critical and comparative analysis across Mauritius, US, UK and Canada Corporate criminal liability and the identification principle: a critical and comparative analysis across Mauritius, US, UK and Canada Admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in money laundering cases in Pakistan Can supervisor reminders help prevent fraud in the mutual funds sector Analysing the characteristics of post-disaster funding that make it susceptible to the risk of economic crime: a South African frame of reference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1