ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCES IN IMAGE QUALITY WITH VARIATIONS IN SLICE THICKNESS IN CT-SCAN BRAIN EXAMINATIONS WITH TRAUMA CASES AT THE RADIOLOGY INSTALLATION OF RSI SITI RAHMAH PADANG

Nerifa Dewilza, Sagita Yudha, Wahdini Hanifah, Livia Ade Nansih, Rahayus Septiani
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCES IN IMAGE QUALITY WITH VARIATIONS IN SLICE THICKNESS IN CT-SCAN BRAIN EXAMINATIONS WITH TRAUMA CASES AT THE RADIOLOGY INSTALLATION OF RSI SITI RAHMAH PADANG","authors":"Nerifa Dewilza, Sagita Yudha, Wahdini Hanifah, Livia Ade Nansih, Rahayus Septiani","doi":"10.33666/jitk.v15i2.643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has been carried out on the analysis of differences in image quality with slice thickness variations in CT-Scan brain examinations with trauma cases at the Radiology Installation at RSI Siti Rahmah Padang. This study aims to determine the difference in image quality with varying slice thicknesses of 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm in CT-Scan brain examinations with trauma cases and what slice thickness is capable of producing optimal image quality in establishing a diagnosis in CT-Scan brain examinations. with trauma cases. This research was conducted in January 2022 - June 2022 with a quantitative type of research with experimental methods, using purposive sampling techniques and questionnaire data distributed to respondents were processed using the weight mean score formula and the SPSS Friedman method. According to the weight mean score formula, the highest average value for the slice thickness variations of 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm is a slice thickness of 3 mm with an average value of 3.64, contrast resolution has an average value of 3.67, noise is 3. 49 and the results of the CT-Scan brain examination in the bone window in trauma cases had an average of t3.74. Based on the SPSS results of the Friedman method, it was found that there was a significant difference in the results of slice thickness variations of 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm in the CT-Scan brain examination with trauma cases because (p-value < 0.05), this shows that Hₒ was rejected and Hₐ was accepted. A good slice thickness variation for showing trauma on a CT-Scan brain examination is a slice thickness of 3 mm in the bone window, because if there is a very small fracture it can be seen more clearly.","PeriodicalId":477506,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kesehatan","volume":"8 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kesehatan","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33666/jitk.v15i2.643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has been carried out on the analysis of differences in image quality with slice thickness variations in CT-Scan brain examinations with trauma cases at the Radiology Installation at RSI Siti Rahmah Padang. This study aims to determine the difference in image quality with varying slice thicknesses of 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm in CT-Scan brain examinations with trauma cases and what slice thickness is capable of producing optimal image quality in establishing a diagnosis in CT-Scan brain examinations. with trauma cases. This research was conducted in January 2022 - June 2022 with a quantitative type of research with experimental methods, using purposive sampling techniques and questionnaire data distributed to respondents were processed using the weight mean score formula and the SPSS Friedman method. According to the weight mean score formula, the highest average value for the slice thickness variations of 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm is a slice thickness of 3 mm with an average value of 3.64, contrast resolution has an average value of 3.67, noise is 3. 49 and the results of the CT-Scan brain examination in the bone window in trauma cases had an average of t3.74. Based on the SPSS results of the Friedman method, it was found that there was a significant difference in the results of slice thickness variations of 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm in the CT-Scan brain examination with trauma cases because (p-value < 0.05), this shows that Hₒ was rejected and Hₐ was accepted. A good slice thickness variation for showing trauma on a CT-Scan brain examination is a slice thickness of 3 mm in the bone window, because if there is a very small fracture it can be seen more clearly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RSI SITI RAHMATH PADANG 放射科对脑部外伤病例进行 CT 扫描检查时,随切片厚度变化而出现的图像质量差异分析
巴东锡蒂拉玛医院放射科对脑部 CT 扫描创伤病例中不同切片厚度的图像质量差异进行了分析研究。这项研究的目的是确定 3 毫米、5 毫米和 7 毫米不同切片厚度在脑部 CT 扫描创伤病例检查中的图像质量差异,以及哪种切片厚度能够在脑部 CT 扫描创伤病例检查中产生最佳图像质量,以确定诊断结果。本研究于 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月进行,采用实验方法进行定量研究,使用目的性抽样技术,并使用加权平均分公式和 SPSS 弗里德曼方法处理向受访者发放的问卷数据。根据权重均分公式,切片厚度变化为 3 毫米、5 毫米和 7 毫米的平均值最高,切片厚度为 3 毫米的平均值为 3.64,对比分辨率的平均值为 3.67,噪声为 3.49,创伤病例骨窗脑部 CT 扫描检查结果的平均值为 t3.74。根据弗里德曼法的 SPSS 结果,发现外伤病例脑部 CT 扫描中 3 毫米、5 毫米和 7 毫米的切片厚度变化结果存在显著差异,因为(P 值<0.05),这表明拒绝 Hₒ,接受 Hₐ。在脑部 CT 扫描检查中,显示创伤的良好切片厚度变化是骨窗的切片厚度为 3 毫米,因为如果有非常小的骨折,可以看得更清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CARING NURSES IN THE PREVENTION OF FALL RISK PATIENTS IN THE INPATIENT ROOM ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCES IN IMAGE QUALITY WITH VARIATIONS IN SLICE THICKNESS IN CT-SCAN BRAIN EXAMINATIONS WITH TRAUMA CASES AT THE RADIOLOGY INSTALLATION OF RSI SITI RAHMAH PADANG FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION SELECTION BY PREGNANT WOMEN IN LEREP HEALTH CENTER THE USE OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT BY PHARMACISTS AND RADIOGRAPHERS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN KENDAL DISTRICT EXPLORING RISK FACTORS AND THEIR IMPACT ON CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1