Schutz- und Sorgepraktiken: Wie LSBT-Organisationen in Deutschland Safer Spaces für ihre Arbeit mit queeren Asylbewerber:innen und Geflüchteten adaptieren
{"title":"Schutz- und Sorgepraktiken: Wie LSBT-Organisationen in Deutschland Safer Spaces für ihre Arbeit mit queeren Asylbewerber:innen und Geflüchteten adaptieren","authors":"Lotte J. Hiller","doi":"10.5194/gh-79-205-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Since the “summer of migration” in 2015, LGBT organizations have been actively involved in migration work, particularly in creating safer spaces for queer asylum seekers and refugees. This involvement marks a shift as these organizations previously had limited engagement with queer people of color. German LGBT organizations focus on providing support, security, and community for queer asylum seekers and refugees, drawing upon the concept of safer spaces. While existing literature addresses LGBT organizations in development and the challenges faced by queer asylum seekers, there is limited research on the creation of safer spaces. Research suggests a predominant focus on spatial separation as a means of ensuring safety. This article aims to fill this research gap by exploring how German LGBT organizations are adapting and institutionalizing the concept of safer spaces. It investigates the role of spatial separation, control mechanisms, and potential essentialist and cultural biases in shaping safer spaces. The study contextualizes this within the framework of homonationalism in Germany, followed by a theoretical exploration of safer spaces and an empirical analysis of how LGBT organizations conceptualize them. Drawing on expert interviews with spokespersons of German LGBT organizations and an extensive analysis of their websites, my study shows the ways in which the LGBT organizations construct themselves as saviors of vulnerable queer asylum seekers and migrants, while constructing the non-queer asylum seekers and migrants as a threat through othering. Following the logics of these safer space concepts, spatial separation appears as the ultimate solution to offer safety to queer migrants and refugees. In contrast, I also observe alternative safer spaces offered by LGBT organizations, which, in addition to their purely protective function, also create spaces for caring practices and peer-to-peer empowerment through storytelling.\n","PeriodicalId":505789,"journal":{"name":"Geographica Helvetica","volume":"89 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographica Helvetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-205-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract. Since the “summer of migration” in 2015, LGBT organizations have been actively involved in migration work, particularly in creating safer spaces for queer asylum seekers and refugees. This involvement marks a shift as these organizations previously had limited engagement with queer people of color. German LGBT organizations focus on providing support, security, and community for queer asylum seekers and refugees, drawing upon the concept of safer spaces. While existing literature addresses LGBT organizations in development and the challenges faced by queer asylum seekers, there is limited research on the creation of safer spaces. Research suggests a predominant focus on spatial separation as a means of ensuring safety. This article aims to fill this research gap by exploring how German LGBT organizations are adapting and institutionalizing the concept of safer spaces. It investigates the role of spatial separation, control mechanisms, and potential essentialist and cultural biases in shaping safer spaces. The study contextualizes this within the framework of homonationalism in Germany, followed by a theoretical exploration of safer spaces and an empirical analysis of how LGBT organizations conceptualize them. Drawing on expert interviews with spokespersons of German LGBT organizations and an extensive analysis of their websites, my study shows the ways in which the LGBT organizations construct themselves as saviors of vulnerable queer asylum seekers and migrants, while constructing the non-queer asylum seekers and migrants as a threat through othering. Following the logics of these safer space concepts, spatial separation appears as the ultimate solution to offer safety to queer migrants and refugees. In contrast, I also observe alternative safer spaces offered by LGBT organizations, which, in addition to their purely protective function, also create spaces for caring practices and peer-to-peer empowerment through storytelling.
摘要自2015年 "移民之夏 "以来,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者组织一直积极参与移民工作,尤其是为寻求庇护的同性恋者和难民创造更安全的空间。这种参与标志着一种转变,因为这些组织以前与有色人种同性恋者的接触有限。德国的男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者组织借鉴 "更安全空间 "的概念,侧重于为寻求庇护的同性恋者和难民提供支持、安全和社区。虽然现有文献探讨了发展中的 LGBT 组织以及寻求庇护的同性恋者所面临的挑战,但关于创建更安全空间的研究却十分有限。研究表明,确保安全的手段主要集中在空间隔离上。本文旨在通过探讨德国男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者组织如何调整更安全空间的概念并将其制度化,填补这一研究空白。文章探讨了空间隔离、控制机制以及潜在的本质主义和文化偏见在塑造更安全空间中的作用。研究将这一问题置于德国同性恋民族主义的框架内,随后对更安全空间进行了理论探讨,并对 LGBT 组织如何将其概念化进行了实证分析。通过对德国 LGBT 组织发言人的专家访谈以及对其网站的广泛分析,我的研究显示了 LGBT 组织如何将自己塑造成脆弱的同性恋寻求庇护者和移民的拯救者,同时通过他者化将非同性恋寻求庇护者和移民塑造成威胁。按照这些安全空间概念的逻辑,空间隔离似乎是为同性恋移民和难民提供安全的最终解决方案。与此相反,我还观察到女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者组织提供的其他安全空间,这些空间除了纯粹的保护功能外,还通过讲故事为关爱实践和同侪赋权创造空间。