Impact of Seroma Volume Reduction on Dosimetry in Whole Breast Radiation Therapy: A Case Study and Adaptive Planning Considerations

Yen-Cho Huang, Jih-Hsiang Yeh, Chien Sheng Tsai
{"title":"Impact of Seroma Volume Reduction on Dosimetry in Whole Breast Radiation Therapy: A Case Study and Adaptive Planning Considerations","authors":"Yen-Cho Huang, Jih-Hsiang Yeh, Chien Sheng Tsai","doi":"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i75517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To explore the impact of seroma volume reduction on dosimetry during whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) and evaluate the significance of adaptive planning. \nPresentation of Case: A 71-year-old female with left breast invasive carcinoma underwent lumpectomy and radiotherapy. An initial CT (CT1) six weeks taken post-op showed a seroma cavity, and a second CT (CT2) five weeks later documented a 65% seroma volume reduction (from 217 c.c. to 75 c.c.). Five radiotherapy techniques were evaluated: two-field conventional, three-field conventional, forward IMRT, inverse IMRT, and VMAT. Inverse IMRT and VMAT achieved better high-dose coverage and reproducibility but had larger dose variations. They also showed higher maximum doses and increased hot spot volumes, indicating potential overdosage risks. Conventional techniques provided stable lower-dose coverage but less uniform high-dose distribution compared to IMRT and VMAT. \nDiscussion: The significant reduction in seroma volume affected dosimetry, highlighting the importance of adaptive planning. In this case, daily KV and weekly MV imaging were used for alignment, but CBCT may better monitor seroma changes. Adaptive radiotherapy, repeated CT simulations, and CBCT are essential for effective treatment. Further research should focus on improving treatment precision through advanced imaging and radiotherapy technologies. \nConclusion: This single WBRT case highlights the dosimetric impact of seroma reduction and the importance of imaging and adaptive strategies. Advanced techniques like inverse IMRT and VMAT improve precision but need careful IGRT monitoring. These findings emphasize the need for individualized adaptive planning considerations and further research to optimize protocols for managing seroma volume changes during WBRT.","PeriodicalId":506708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","volume":"48 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i75517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To explore the impact of seroma volume reduction on dosimetry during whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) and evaluate the significance of adaptive planning. Presentation of Case: A 71-year-old female with left breast invasive carcinoma underwent lumpectomy and radiotherapy. An initial CT (CT1) six weeks taken post-op showed a seroma cavity, and a second CT (CT2) five weeks later documented a 65% seroma volume reduction (from 217 c.c. to 75 c.c.). Five radiotherapy techniques were evaluated: two-field conventional, three-field conventional, forward IMRT, inverse IMRT, and VMAT. Inverse IMRT and VMAT achieved better high-dose coverage and reproducibility but had larger dose variations. They also showed higher maximum doses and increased hot spot volumes, indicating potential overdosage risks. Conventional techniques provided stable lower-dose coverage but less uniform high-dose distribution compared to IMRT and VMAT. Discussion: The significant reduction in seroma volume affected dosimetry, highlighting the importance of adaptive planning. In this case, daily KV and weekly MV imaging were used for alignment, but CBCT may better monitor seroma changes. Adaptive radiotherapy, repeated CT simulations, and CBCT are essential for effective treatment. Further research should focus on improving treatment precision through advanced imaging and radiotherapy technologies. Conclusion: This single WBRT case highlights the dosimetric impact of seroma reduction and the importance of imaging and adaptive strategies. Advanced techniques like inverse IMRT and VMAT improve precision but need careful IGRT monitoring. These findings emphasize the need for individualized adaptive planning considerations and further research to optimize protocols for managing seroma volume changes during WBRT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少血清肿体积对全乳腺放射治疗剂量测定的影响:案例研究和适应性计划考虑因素
目的: 探讨血清肿体积缩小对全乳腺放射治疗(WBRT)剂量测定的影响,并评估自适应计划的意义。病例介绍:一名 71 岁的女性,患有左侧乳腺浸润性癌,接受了肿块切除术和放疗。术后六周的首次 CT(CT1)显示有血清肿腔,五周后的第二次 CT(CT2)显示血清肿体积缩小了 65%(从 217 c.c.缩小到 75 c.c.)。对五种放射治疗技术进行了评估:两场常规、三场常规、正向 IMRT、反向 IMRT 和 VMAT。反向 IMRT 和 VMAT 实现了更好的高剂量覆盖率和可重复性,但剂量变化较大。它们还显示出更高的最大剂量和更大的热点体积,显示出潜在的剂量过量风险。与 IMRT 和 VMAT 相比,传统技术提供了稳定的低剂量覆盖,但高剂量分布不够均匀。讨论血清肿体积的大幅缩小影响了剂量测定,突出了适应性计划的重要性。在该病例中,每天的 KV 和每周的 MV 成像用于对准,但 CBCT 可以更好地监测血清肿的变化。自适应放疗、重复 CT 模拟和 CBCT 对有效治疗至关重要。进一步的研究应侧重于通过先进的成像和放疗技术提高治疗的精确性。结论:这个单一的 WBRT 病例突出了减少血清肿的剂量学影响以及成像和适应性策略的重要性。反向 IMRT 和 VMAT 等先进技术可提高精确度,但需要对 IGRT 进行仔细监测。这些发现强调了个性化适应性规划考虑的必要性,以及进一步研究优化 WBRT 期间血清肿体积变化管理方案的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Burning Issue on Oral Mucosal Diseases: Case Series with Review Myocardial Infarction: Causes, Symptoms, and Emergency Response Tooth Discoloration Induced by Calcium Silicate-based Sealers Effectiveness and Safety of Tapentadol in Managing Diabetic Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review PTSD Treatment: An Inquiry into the Promising Potential of Psilocybin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1