Excellence or perfection: Examining work performance mediated through employee engagement in India

Kanika Kohli, Archana Tyagi, Poonam Khurana, Nandan Prabhu
{"title":"Excellence or perfection: Examining work performance mediated through employee engagement in India","authors":"Kanika Kohli, Archana Tyagi, Poonam Khurana, Nandan Prabhu","doi":"10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The model of excellencism and perfectionism (MEP) theorizes that the attitude toward goals as characterized in excellencism is desirable over perfectionism. Using the self-determination theory (SDT), this study aims to investigate the varying effects of perfectionism and excellencism on work engagement and performance. The study used a time-lagged multi-phase, multi-source, and cross-sectional online survey to collect responses from 360 corporate employees of Indian companies in the services industry. The results indicate that while both perfectionism and excellencism entail pursuing high standards, they relate differently with performance and work engagement. Interestingly, excellencism and work engagement were significantly associated with performance (p < .001); however, perfectionism was insignificant (p = .989). Perfectionism strengthens work engagement (β = 0.112; p = .013), while excellencism has an insignificant effect (β = 0.035; p = .537). Work engagement fully mediates the perfectionism-performance relationship. This demonstrates that striving for excellence alone is sufficient to achieve positive performance, challenging the traditional belief that one must focus on perfection. Furthermore, perfectionism is positively associated with performance only when employees are engaged and have positive motivation toward work.","PeriodicalId":509767,"journal":{"name":"Problems and Perspectives in Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems and Perspectives in Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The model of excellencism and perfectionism (MEP) theorizes that the attitude toward goals as characterized in excellencism is desirable over perfectionism. Using the self-determination theory (SDT), this study aims to investigate the varying effects of perfectionism and excellencism on work engagement and performance. The study used a time-lagged multi-phase, multi-source, and cross-sectional online survey to collect responses from 360 corporate employees of Indian companies in the services industry. The results indicate that while both perfectionism and excellencism entail pursuing high standards, they relate differently with performance and work engagement. Interestingly, excellencism and work engagement were significantly associated with performance (p < .001); however, perfectionism was insignificant (p = .989). Perfectionism strengthens work engagement (β = 0.112; p = .013), while excellencism has an insignificant effect (β = 0.035; p = .537). Work engagement fully mediates the perfectionism-performance relationship. This demonstrates that striving for excellence alone is sufficient to achieve positive performance, challenging the traditional belief that one must focus on perfection. Furthermore, perfectionism is positively associated with performance only when employees are engaged and have positive motivation toward work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卓越还是完美?考察印度以员工参与为中介的工作绩效
优秀主义和完美主义模型(MEP)理论认为,优秀主义中的目标态度比完美主义更可取。本研究采用自我决定理论(SDT),旨在探讨完美主义和优秀主义对工作投入和绩效的不同影响。研究采用了时滞多阶段、多来源、横截面在线调查的方法,收集了印度服务业公司 360 名企业员工的反馈。结果表明,虽然完美主义和卓越主义都需要追求高标准,但它们与绩效和工作投入的关系却不同。有趣的是,卓越主义和工作投入度与绩效有显著关联(p <.001);然而,完美主义却不显著(p = .989)。完美主义增强了工作投入度(β = 0.112; p = .013),而优秀主义的影响不明显(β = 0.035; p = .537)。工作投入完全调节了完美主义与绩效之间的关系。这表明,追求卓越本身就足以取得积极的绩效,从而挑战了人们必须注重完美的传统观念。此外,只有当员工投入工作并对工作有积极的动机时,完美主义才会与绩效正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circular economy awareness, adoption, and its effects on business performance in Saudi Arabia Measuring innovation capability and its effects on financial performance using companies’ annual reports Excellence or perfection: Examining work performance mediated through employee engagement in India Contextual determinants of employee motivation Psychological contract and turnover intention in luxury hotels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1