Did the Glasgow COP26 negotiations meet or miss Article 6 (carbon markets) of the Paris Agreement? A systematic review of the literature

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1111/polp.12621
Majid Asadnabizadeh
{"title":"Did the Glasgow COP26 negotiations meet or miss Article 6 (carbon markets) of the Paris Agreement? A systematic review of the literature","authors":"Majid Asadnabizadeh","doi":"10.1111/polp.12621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The Paris Agreement is an important milestone in international climate policy and the associated negotiations of the United Nations Climate Summit under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Article 6 of the Paris Agreement is a supplementary mechanism—regarding carbon markets—to reduce greenhouse gases and achieve the UNFCCC's main objective of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations. The 2021 United Nations Climate Summit in Glasgow (COP26) played a key role in the pursuit of this goal. Via an overview of Article 6 negotiations in past COP summits and a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature leading up to COP26, I identify three arguments involving Articles 6.2, 6.4, and 6.8 behind the selected literature. I substantiate these arguments based on the meta-evaluation of the existing literature and propose a three-stage meta-evaluation of the arguments on Article 6 (carbon markets) of the Paris Agreement in the context of COP26 to ascertain if the negotiations were successful in leading to requisite agreements on Article 6. I conclude that future qualitative research should focus on Articles 6.4 and 6.8 of the Paris Agreement and examine the outcomes of future climate debates to see how ideas will flow through the negotiations regarding these two articles to pursue the goal of the UNFCCC under the Paris Agreement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Jihyung Joo, Jihyung, Jouni Paavola, and James Van Alstine. 2023. “The Divergence of South Korea's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) from the EU ETS: An Institutional Complementarity View.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(6): 1155–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12566.</p>\n \n <p>Nunes Silva, Carlos. 2012. “Policy and Evidence in a Partisan Age: The Great Disconnect—By Paul Gary Wyckoff.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 40(3): 541–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00363.x.</p>\n \n <p>Robles, Pedro, and Daniel J. Mallinson. 2023. “Catching up with AI: Pushing toward a Cohesive Governance Framework.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51(3): 355–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12529.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"52 4","pages":"757-777"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Paris Agreement is an important milestone in international climate policy and the associated negotiations of the United Nations Climate Summit under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Article 6 of the Paris Agreement is a supplementary mechanism—regarding carbon markets—to reduce greenhouse gases and achieve the UNFCCC's main objective of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations. The 2021 United Nations Climate Summit in Glasgow (COP26) played a key role in the pursuit of this goal. Via an overview of Article 6 negotiations in past COP summits and a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature leading up to COP26, I identify three arguments involving Articles 6.2, 6.4, and 6.8 behind the selected literature. I substantiate these arguments based on the meta-evaluation of the existing literature and propose a three-stage meta-evaluation of the arguments on Article 6 (carbon markets) of the Paris Agreement in the context of COP26 to ascertain if the negotiations were successful in leading to requisite agreements on Article 6. I conclude that future qualitative research should focus on Articles 6.4 and 6.8 of the Paris Agreement and examine the outcomes of future climate debates to see how ideas will flow through the negotiations regarding these two articles to pursue the goal of the UNFCCC under the Paris Agreement.

Related Articles

Jihyung Joo, Jihyung, Jouni Paavola, and James Van Alstine. 2023. “The Divergence of South Korea's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) from the EU ETS: An Institutional Complementarity View.” Politics & Policy 51(6): 1155–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12566.

Nunes Silva, Carlos. 2012. “Policy and Evidence in a Partisan Age: The Great Disconnect—By Paul Gary Wyckoff.” Politics & Policy 40(3): 541–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00363.x.

Robles, Pedro, and Daniel J. Mallinson. 2023. “Catching up with AI: Pushing toward a Cohesive Governance Framework.” Politics & Policy 51(3): 355–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12529.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格拉斯哥 COP26 谈判是否符合或错过了《巴黎协定》第 6 条(碳市场)?文献系统回顾
巴黎协定》是国际气候政策和《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)下联合国气候峰会相关谈判的一个重要里程碑。巴黎协定》第 6 条是一个关于碳市场的补充机制,旨在减少温室气体,实现《联合国气候变化框架公约》稳定温室气体浓度的主要目标。2021 年格拉斯哥联合国气候峰会(COP26)在实现这一目标方面发挥了关键作用。通过对以往缔约方大会峰会第六条谈判的概述,以及对 COP26 召开之前的文献进行系统回顾和定性元综合,我确定了所选文献背后涉及第六条第 2 款、第 4 款和第 8 款的三个论点。我在对现有文献进行元评价的基础上证实了这些论点,并提出了在 COP26 的背景下对《巴黎协定》第 6 条(碳市场)的论点进行三阶段元评价的建议,以确定谈判是否成功地就第 6 条达成了必要的协议。我的结论是,未来的定性研究应关注《巴黎协定》第 6.4 条和第 6.8 条,并研究未来气候辩论的结果,以了解关于这两条的谈判将如何产生想法,从而实现《巴黎协定》下的《联合国气候变化框架公约》目标。2023."韩国排放交易计划(ETS)与欧盟排放交易计划的差异:制度互补观"。政治与政策》51(6):1155-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12566.Nunes Silva, Carlos.2012."党派时代的政策与证据:巨大的脱节--保罗-加里-怀科夫著"。政治与政策》40(3):https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00363.x.Robles, Pedro, and Daniel J. Mallinson.2023."Catching up with AI: Pushing toward a Cohesive Governance Framework." Politics & Policy 51(3).Politics & Policy 51(3):355–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12529.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Toward a Conjunctural Analysis of New York City's Housing Movement Social Movements, Public Policy, and Informal Institutions: The Role of Patronage in Chile (2006–2022) Slow-Moving Welfare State Change in Quebec and “Movements From Below” Issue Information Populist Narratives and Personalized National Role Conception in Middle Powers: The Cases of Mexico and Turkey During the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1