Estimation of Passive Drag in Swimming via Experimental and Computational Means

Alex Haskins, Carla McCabe, Ryan Keating, A. Lennon, Dominic Chandar
{"title":"Estimation of Passive Drag in Swimming via Experimental and Computational Means","authors":"Alex Haskins, Carla McCabe, Ryan Keating, A. Lennon, Dominic Chandar","doi":"10.13052/ejcm2642-2085.3333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussed is a comparison of computational and experimental evaluations of passive drag during human swimming. Experimentally, ten trials were conducted per athlete at five chosen velocities, using a commercial resistance trainer to record the tension force in a rope during a streamline position tow test. The resistive force recorded was assumed equal to the passive drag force and an average value of passive drag was found across each tow test. Mean passive drag values measured during the tow test were agreed well with existing experimental data across the range of velocities used, varying between 20 N at 1 ms−1 up to 100 N at 2 ms−1. Computationally, using the immersed boundary method in OpenFOAM, basic geometry validation cases and streamline passive drag cases were simulated. Validation cases were completed on 2D cylinders and 3D spheres with the drag coefficient found at low and high Reynolds numbers, using the simpleFoam solver within OpenFOAM. Results tended to be slightly over predictive when compared with existing simulation and experimental data in literature. The accuracy of results could potentially be improved using a finer mesh and better quality geometries. The passive drag was also computed using OpenFOAM over a range of velocities, similar to the experiments, varying from 30 N at 1 ms−1 to 120 N at 2 ms−1. Drag forces computed using simpleFoam were over predictive when compared to existing literature and the completed experiments, likely due to the inaccuracy of the geometry used in the simulations. When results were compared to existing literature for swimmers not in a perfect streamline position, more similar to the geometry used in this study, results were in better agreement. The accuracy of the results could be improved using a better quality geometry in the correct position.","PeriodicalId":45463,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Computational Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Computational Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13052/ejcm2642-2085.3333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discussed is a comparison of computational and experimental evaluations of passive drag during human swimming. Experimentally, ten trials were conducted per athlete at five chosen velocities, using a commercial resistance trainer to record the tension force in a rope during a streamline position tow test. The resistive force recorded was assumed equal to the passive drag force and an average value of passive drag was found across each tow test. Mean passive drag values measured during the tow test were agreed well with existing experimental data across the range of velocities used, varying between 20 N at 1 ms−1 up to 100 N at 2 ms−1. Computationally, using the immersed boundary method in OpenFOAM, basic geometry validation cases and streamline passive drag cases were simulated. Validation cases were completed on 2D cylinders and 3D spheres with the drag coefficient found at low and high Reynolds numbers, using the simpleFoam solver within OpenFOAM. Results tended to be slightly over predictive when compared with existing simulation and experimental data in literature. The accuracy of results could potentially be improved using a finer mesh and better quality geometries. The passive drag was also computed using OpenFOAM over a range of velocities, similar to the experiments, varying from 30 N at 1 ms−1 to 120 N at 2 ms−1. Drag forces computed using simpleFoam were over predictive when compared to existing literature and the completed experiments, likely due to the inaccuracy of the geometry used in the simulations. When results were compared to existing literature for swimmers not in a perfect streamline position, more similar to the geometry used in this study, results were in better agreement. The accuracy of the results could be improved using a better quality geometry in the correct position.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过实验和计算估算游泳中的被动阻力
本文对人类游泳过程中被动阻力的计算和实验评估进行了比较。在实验中,使用商用阻力训练器在流线位置拖曳测试中记录绳索的拉力,以五种选定的速度对每位运动员进行了十次测试。记录的阻力被假定为等于被动阻力,每次拖曳测试都会得出被动阻力的平均值。在所使用的速度范围内,拖曳测试期间测得的平均被动阻力值与现有实验数据非常吻合,从 1 ms-1 时的 20 N 到 2 ms-1 时的 100 N 不等。在计算方面,使用 OpenFOAM 中的沉浸边界法模拟了基本几何验证案例和流线型被动阻力案例。在二维圆柱体和三维球体上完成了验证案例,使用 OpenFOAM 中的 simpleFoam 求解器在低雷诺数和高雷诺数下发现了阻力系数。与文献中现有的模拟和实验数据相比,结果倾向于略微偏高。使用更精细的网格和质量更好的几何图形可能会提高结果的准确性。使用 OpenFOAM 还计算了与实验类似的速度范围内的被动阻力,从 1 ms-1 时的 30 N 到 2 ms-1 时的 120 N 不等。与现有文献和已完成的实验相比,使用 simpleFoam 计算出的阻力预测过高,这可能是由于模拟中使用的几何形状不准确。如果将非完美流线位置(与本研究中使用的几何形状更相似)的游泳者的结果与现有文献进行比较,结果的一致性会更好。在正确的位置上使用质量更好的几何体可以提高结果的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating Branched Cut-off Wall Effect on Seepage Using Numerical Modelling Robust Fast Fracture Plane Orientation Angle Search Algorithm for Puck 3D Inter-Fibre Failure Criterion Estimation of Passive Drag in Swimming via Experimental and Computational Means Influence of Spatially Varying Boundary Conditions Based on Material Heterogeneity Study on Stability Analysis Method of Loess Slope Based on Catastrophe Theory – A Case Study of Loess Slope in Yili, Xinjiang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1