Over-the-counter cosmeceuticals: Exploring usage patterns and attitudes among Indians

Cosmoderma Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.25259/csdm_76_2024
Abhishek Bhatnagar, Bhavni Oberoi, T. Thayumanavan, Afreen Ayub
{"title":"Over-the-counter cosmeceuticals: Exploring usage patterns and attitudes among Indians","authors":"Abhishek Bhatnagar, Bhavni Oberoi, T. Thayumanavan, Afreen Ayub","doi":"10.25259/csdm_76_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe study’s objectives were to find the prevalence of over-the-counter (OTC) usage of skin, nail, and hair care products and to understand the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of the Indian population presenting to a non-dermatology outpatient department (OPD) for various indications concerning this usage.\n\n\n\nThis was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study, conducted over a year, in which 668 consenting Indians aged 18–60 years, representing various socioeconomic backgrounds were surveyed through Google Forms regarding the OTC cosmeceutical usage in a non-dermatology OPD.\n\n\n\nThis KAP study was conducted on 668 participants, of whom the majority were middle-aged males (481 [72.01%]), with a diverse socioeconomic range, with the upper-middle class making up the largest segment (264 [39.52%]). Allopathy was the primary treatment choice for 347 (51.95%) of participants, with 566 (84.73%) preferring professional healthcare over self-medication. Social media was a significant source of skincare information, with Google Ads (279 [41.8%]) and Instagram (84 [12.6%]) being popular platforms. While doctors’ advice influenced 270 (40.4%) of participants in their skincare choices, word-of-mouth played a role, with 251 (37.57%) agreeing it was helpful. OTC usage was found to vary by socioeconomic class and treatment type. Oral OTC products were preferred for skin health, especially in the upper class, while fairness creams were more common among the lower class.\n\n\n\nDespite the growing reliance on social media for skincare information, traditional sources such as word-of-mouth and TV still hold sway, indicating a mix of modern and conventional influences. The frequency and type of OTC product usage varied across socioeconomic classes, with oral products like vitamin supplements leading in the upper class and fairness creams leading in the lower class, reflecting the societal pressure for a fair complexion in this subset.\n","PeriodicalId":505497,"journal":{"name":"Cosmoderma","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cosmoderma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/csdm_76_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study’s objectives were to find the prevalence of over-the-counter (OTC) usage of skin, nail, and hair care products and to understand the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of the Indian population presenting to a non-dermatology outpatient department (OPD) for various indications concerning this usage. This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study, conducted over a year, in which 668 consenting Indians aged 18–60 years, representing various socioeconomic backgrounds were surveyed through Google Forms regarding the OTC cosmeceutical usage in a non-dermatology OPD. This KAP study was conducted on 668 participants, of whom the majority were middle-aged males (481 [72.01%]), with a diverse socioeconomic range, with the upper-middle class making up the largest segment (264 [39.52%]). Allopathy was the primary treatment choice for 347 (51.95%) of participants, with 566 (84.73%) preferring professional healthcare over self-medication. Social media was a significant source of skincare information, with Google Ads (279 [41.8%]) and Instagram (84 [12.6%]) being popular platforms. While doctors’ advice influenced 270 (40.4%) of participants in their skincare choices, word-of-mouth played a role, with 251 (37.57%) agreeing it was helpful. OTC usage was found to vary by socioeconomic class and treatment type. Oral OTC products were preferred for skin health, especially in the upper class, while fairness creams were more common among the lower class. Despite the growing reliance on social media for skincare information, traditional sources such as word-of-mouth and TV still hold sway, indicating a mix of modern and conventional influences. The frequency and type of OTC product usage varied across socioeconomic classes, with oral products like vitamin supplements leading in the upper class and fairness creams leading in the lower class, reflecting the societal pressure for a fair complexion in this subset.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非处方药妆:探索印度人的使用模式和态度
这项研究的目的是了解皮肤、指甲和头发护理产品的非处方药(OTC)使用率,并了解因各种适应症到非皮肤科门诊部(OPD)就诊的印度人对这种使用的知识、态度和做法(KAPs)。这是一项以横断面问卷调查为基础的研究,历时一年,通过谷歌表格对 668 名年龄在 18-60 岁之间、代表不同社会经济背景的印度人进行了调查,了解他们在非皮肤科门诊部使用非处方药妆的情况。这项 KAP 研究针对 668 名参与者进行,其中大多数是中年男性(481 人 [72.01%]),社会经济背景各不相同,中上阶层占最大比例(264 人 [39.52%])。347名参与者(51.95%)的主要治疗选择是对抗疗法,566名参与者(84.73%)选择专业医疗保健而非自我治疗。社交媒体是护肤信息的重要来源,其中谷歌广告(279 [41.8%])和 Instagram(84 [12.6%])是最受欢迎的平台。有 270 名参与者(40.4%)在选择护肤品时受到医生建议的影响,而 251 名参与者(37.57%)也认为口口相传对他们有帮助。非处方药的使用因社会经济阶层和治疗类型而异。口服非处方药产品是皮肤健康的首选,尤其是在上层阶级,而美白霜则在下层阶级中更为常见。尽管人们越来越依赖社交媒体来获取护肤信息,但口碑和电视等传统来源仍然占据主导地位,这表明现代和传统的影响并存。不同社会经济阶层使用非处方药产品的频率和类型各不相同,上层阶级主要使用维生素补充剂等口服产品,而下层阶级则主要使用美白霜,这反映了社会对这一群体要求肤色白皙的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Over-the-counter cosmeceuticals: Exploring usage patterns and attitudes among Indians Lymphedema after COVID-19 vaccination: Two case reports Nevus comedonicus: Clinical and dermoscopic features Linear immunoglobulin A/immunoglobulin G bullous dermatosis with celiac disease in a 26-year-old Filipino male Primary cutaneous actinomycosis manifesting as pyomyositis: A diagnostic challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1