Balancing water conservation and health: do water-saving showerheads impact the microbes we breathe in during showering?

Sarah Pitell, Cheolwoon Woo, Evan Trump, Sarah Haig
{"title":"Balancing water conservation and health: do water-saving showerheads impact the microbes we breathe in during showering?","authors":"Sarah Pitell, Cheolwoon Woo, Evan Trump, Sarah Haig","doi":"10.3389/frmbi.2024.1416055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-flow showerheads offer consumers economic and water-saving benefits, yet their use may inadvertently affect the microbial content of produced water and water-associated aerosols. This study aimed to compare the abundance and microbial composition of bacteria in shower water and associated respirable aerosols produced by various low flow rate (1, 1.5, and 1.8 gpm) showerheads. Our findings indicate that the lowest-flow showerhead produces water with lower total microbial and opportunistic bacterial pathogen densities compared to higher low flow rate counterparts. However, microbiome analysis revealed that 1.8 gpm flow rate showerheads exhibit reduced abundance of Gram-negative organisms and common biofilm-forming organisms, suggesting potentially lower pathogenicity compared to 1 and 1.5 gpm low-flow showerheads. Additionally, the number of respirable aerosols produced by showerheads as well as the partitioning of certain microorganisms from the water to aerosol phases was negatively correlated with flow rate, suggesting that there may be increasing exposure potential to pathogenic bioaerosols when using a 1gpm showerhead compared to a 1.8 gpm showerhead. However, the 1.5 gpm showerhead seemed to balance microbial partitioning, aerosol generation, and water conservation. Moreover, the microbial composition of aerosols produced from shower water was more influenced by the age of the showerhead than the flow rate, highlighting the significance of biofilm formation on the microbial community. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of evaluating the microbial risk associated with low-flow showerheads using multiple metrics in both water and aerosols, and dynamically assessing this over time, to ensure accurate future risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":73089,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in microbiomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in microbiomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frmbi.2024.1416055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-flow showerheads offer consumers economic and water-saving benefits, yet their use may inadvertently affect the microbial content of produced water and water-associated aerosols. This study aimed to compare the abundance and microbial composition of bacteria in shower water and associated respirable aerosols produced by various low flow rate (1, 1.5, and 1.8 gpm) showerheads. Our findings indicate that the lowest-flow showerhead produces water with lower total microbial and opportunistic bacterial pathogen densities compared to higher low flow rate counterparts. However, microbiome analysis revealed that 1.8 gpm flow rate showerheads exhibit reduced abundance of Gram-negative organisms and common biofilm-forming organisms, suggesting potentially lower pathogenicity compared to 1 and 1.5 gpm low-flow showerheads. Additionally, the number of respirable aerosols produced by showerheads as well as the partitioning of certain microorganisms from the water to aerosol phases was negatively correlated with flow rate, suggesting that there may be increasing exposure potential to pathogenic bioaerosols when using a 1gpm showerhead compared to a 1.8 gpm showerhead. However, the 1.5 gpm showerhead seemed to balance microbial partitioning, aerosol generation, and water conservation. Moreover, the microbial composition of aerosols produced from shower water was more influenced by the age of the showerhead than the flow rate, highlighting the significance of biofilm formation on the microbial community. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of evaluating the microbial risk associated with low-flow showerheads using multiple metrics in both water and aerosols, and dynamically assessing this over time, to ensure accurate future risk assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡节水与健康:节水型淋浴喷头会影响我们在淋浴时吸入的微生物吗?
低流量淋浴喷头为消费者带来了经济和节水方面的好处,但其使用可能会无意中影响出水和水相关气溶胶中的微生物含量。本研究旨在比较各种低流量(1、1.5 和 1.8 加仑/分)淋浴喷头产生的淋浴水和相关可吸入气溶胶中细菌的丰度和微生物组成。我们的研究结果表明,与较高的低流量花洒相比,最低流量花洒产生的水中微生物总数和机会性细菌病原体密度较低。然而,微生物组分析表明,1.8 gpm 流量的淋浴喷头显示出革兰氏阴性生物和常见生物膜形成生物的数量减少,这表明与 1 和 1.5 gpm 的低流量淋浴喷头相比,其致病性可能更低。此外,淋浴喷头产生的可吸入气溶胶数量以及某些微生物从水到气溶胶阶段的分配与流量呈负相关,这表明与 1.8 gpm 的淋浴喷头相比,使用 1 gpm 的淋浴喷头可能会增加接触致病性生物气溶胶的可能性。不过,1.5 gpm 的淋浴喷头似乎在微生物分区、气溶胶生成和节水之间取得了平衡。此外,花洒水中产生的气溶胶的微生物组成受花洒使用年限的影响比受流速的影响更大,这凸显了生物膜的形成对微生物群落的重要影响。总之,我们的研究结果强调了利用水和气溶胶中的多种指标评估与低流量淋浴喷头相关的微生物风险的重要性,并随着时间的推移进行动态评估,以确保未来风险评估的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial resistance burden, and mechanisms of its emergence in gut microbiomes of Indian population Microbiome variations induced by delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol predict weight reduction in obese mice Recent advances in fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection-associated diarrhea after kidney transplantation Balancing water conservation and health: do water-saving showerheads impact the microbes we breathe in during showering? Association of resistome abundance with hyperuricaemia in elderly individuals: a metagenomics study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1