Compared the Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine with Lung Recruitment Maneuver Versus Normal Saline with Lung Recruitment Maneuver in Reducing Shoulder Pain After Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

J. Shahinfar, H. Zeraati, Mahdiyeh Dartoomi, Hosnieh Raoufian
{"title":"Compared the Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine with Lung Recruitment Maneuver Versus Normal Saline with Lung Recruitment Maneuver in Reducing Shoulder Pain After Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"J. Shahinfar, H. Zeraati, Mahdiyeh Dartoomi, Hosnieh Raoufian","doi":"10.5812/aapm-148198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postoperative shoulder pain is one of the most common complications following laparoscopic surgery. Various interventions have been proposed to control this pain. Objectives: The main objective of this comparative study was to determine the effects of intraperitoneal bupivacaine and normal saline infusion, in combination with lung recruitment maneuver (LRM), on shoulder pain following laparoscopic surgery. Methods: The present randomized controlled trial was conducted on 105 candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy referred to Imam Ali Hospital in Bojnurd, Iran, from November 2021 to June 2022. The patients were assigned to three groups using block randomization: BR (receiving 50 cc of 0.25% diluted intraperitoneal bupivacaine + LRM), NR (receiving 50 cc of intraperitoneal normal saline + LRM), and N (receiving 50 cc of intraperitoneal normal saline). Postoperative shoulder pain and surgical incision site pain were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at recovery intervals of 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, the prevalence of nausea and vomiting, the first time of need for sedation, and the incidence of sedation overdose in the first 24 hours after surgery were investigated. The data were analyzed using one-way analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS software at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The findings showed no significant differences in demographic variables between the three groups. The range and mean score of shoulder pain based on VAS was 0 - 1 (0.3) in the BR group, 0 - 2 (1.4) in the NR group, and 1 - 3 (2.1) in the N group at 4 hours after surgery. The mean score of shoulder pain intensity in the BR group was lower compared to the NR and N groups during recovery time intervals at 4, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. This difference between groups was significant. There was also a statistically significant difference in the mean score of surgical incision site pain intensity and the first time of need for sedation between the three groups. The occurrence of side effects was not significant between the groups. Itching, bradycardia, and hypotension were not observed in any of the groups. Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that bupivacaine, along with LRM, is a safe method effective in relieving postoperative shoulder pain. It prolonged the first time of need for sedation and significantly reduced the incidence of shoulder pain.","PeriodicalId":505231,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"56 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-148198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative shoulder pain is one of the most common complications following laparoscopic surgery. Various interventions have been proposed to control this pain. Objectives: The main objective of this comparative study was to determine the effects of intraperitoneal bupivacaine and normal saline infusion, in combination with lung recruitment maneuver (LRM), on shoulder pain following laparoscopic surgery. Methods: The present randomized controlled trial was conducted on 105 candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy referred to Imam Ali Hospital in Bojnurd, Iran, from November 2021 to June 2022. The patients were assigned to three groups using block randomization: BR (receiving 50 cc of 0.25% diluted intraperitoneal bupivacaine + LRM), NR (receiving 50 cc of intraperitoneal normal saline + LRM), and N (receiving 50 cc of intraperitoneal normal saline). Postoperative shoulder pain and surgical incision site pain were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at recovery intervals of 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, the prevalence of nausea and vomiting, the first time of need for sedation, and the incidence of sedation overdose in the first 24 hours after surgery were investigated. The data were analyzed using one-way analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS software at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The findings showed no significant differences in demographic variables between the three groups. The range and mean score of shoulder pain based on VAS was 0 - 1 (0.3) in the BR group, 0 - 2 (1.4) in the NR group, and 1 - 3 (2.1) in the N group at 4 hours after surgery. The mean score of shoulder pain intensity in the BR group was lower compared to the NR and N groups during recovery time intervals at 4, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. This difference between groups was significant. There was also a statistically significant difference in the mean score of surgical incision site pain intensity and the first time of need for sedation between the three groups. The occurrence of side effects was not significant between the groups. Itching, bradycardia, and hypotension were not observed in any of the groups. Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that bupivacaine, along with LRM, is a safe method effective in relieving postoperative shoulder pain. It prolonged the first time of need for sedation and significantly reduced the incidence of shoulder pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔内布比卡因配合肺复张手法与正常生理盐水配合肺复张手法在减轻腹腔镜手术后肩部疼痛方面的效果比较:双盲随机对照试验
背景:术后肩部疼痛是腹腔镜手术后最常见的并发症之一。人们提出了各种干预措施来控制这种疼痛。研究目的本对比研究的主要目的是确定腹腔注射布比卡因和生理盐水,并结合肺复张手法(LRM)对腹腔镜手术后肩部疼痛的影响。方法:本随机对照试验于 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在伊朗博伊努尔德伊玛目阿里医院对 105 名转诊至该医院接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行了研究。采用整群随机法将患者分为三组:BR组(接受50毫升0.25%稀释的腹腔注射布比卡因+LRM)、NR组(接受50毫升腹腔注射生理盐水+LRM)和N组(接受50毫升腹腔注射生理盐水)。在术后 4、12、24 和 48 小时的恢复时间间隔内,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对术后肩部疼痛和手术切口部位疼痛进行评估。此外,还调查了恶心和呕吐的发生率、首次使用镇静剂的时间以及术后 24 小时内镇静剂过量的发生率。数据采用 SPSS 软件的单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行分析,显著性水平为 0.05。结果显示研究结果显示,三组患者的人口统计学变量无明显差异。术后 4 小时,BR 组的肩痛范围和 VAS 平均值为 0 - 1 (0.3),NR 组为 0 - 2 (1.4),N 组为 1 - 3 (2.1)。与 NR 组和 N 组相比,BR 组在术后 4、12 和 24 小时恢复期间的肩部疼痛强度平均得分较低。组间差异显著。在手术切口部位疼痛强度的平均得分和首次需要镇静的时间方面,三组之间的差异也有统计学意义。副作用的发生率在各组之间无显著差异。各组均未出现瘙痒、心动过缓和低血压。结论本研究结果表明,布比卡因和 LRM 是缓解肩部术后疼痛的一种安全有效的方法。它延长了首次需要镇静的时间,并显著降低了肩痛的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compared the Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine with Lung Recruitment Maneuver Versus Normal Saline with Lung Recruitment Maneuver in Reducing Shoulder Pain After Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Dexmedetomidine Moderate Sedation Versus General Anesthesia on the Diagnostic Yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Study Opioid Free Ptyregopalatine Ganglion Block Based Multimodal Anesthesia Versus Conventional Opioid Based Multimodal Anesthesia for Tonsillectomy Operations: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of Effects of Ultrasound Therapy and Nerve-Gliding Techniques on Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial A Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Triamcinolone vs Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuvants in Caudal Block in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1