Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Face of Globalization

Edwin Kiarie
{"title":"Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Face of Globalization","authors":"Edwin Kiarie","doi":"10.47941/ijhss.2081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore cultural heritage preservation in the face of globalization. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to cultural heritage preservation in the face of globalization. Preliminary empirical review revealed that globalization presented both opportunities and challenges for cultural heritage preservation. While it facilitated cultural exchange and increased international support, it also led to the commercialization and potential degradation of heritage sites. Economic pressures and urbanization posed significant threats, but community involvement and the use of modern technologies offered innovative solutions. Effective preservation required a balanced approach, integrating sustainable tourism, comprehensive urban planning, and empowered local communities to protect and promote cultural identities amidst global influences. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Cultural Globalization Theory, Social Identity Theory and Cultural Capital Theory may be used to anchor future studies on cultural heritage preservation. The study recommended enhancing community involvement, leveraging digital technologies, promoting sustainable tourism practices, strengthening legal and policy frameworks, encouraging international cooperation, and fostering education and public awareness. These recommendations aimed to ensure the active participation of local communities, utilize digital tools for wider access and documentation, balance the economic benefits of tourism with preservation needs, establish robust legal protections, facilitate international collaboration for shared knowledge and resources, and increase public understanding and appreciation of cultural heritage. These measures were suggested to effectively preserve cultural heritage in the face of globalization's challenges.","PeriodicalId":513171,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.2081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore cultural heritage preservation in the face of globalization. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to cultural heritage preservation in the face of globalization. Preliminary empirical review revealed that globalization presented both opportunities and challenges for cultural heritage preservation. While it facilitated cultural exchange and increased international support, it also led to the commercialization and potential degradation of heritage sites. Economic pressures and urbanization posed significant threats, but community involvement and the use of modern technologies offered innovative solutions. Effective preservation required a balanced approach, integrating sustainable tourism, comprehensive urban planning, and empowered local communities to protect and promote cultural identities amidst global influences. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Cultural Globalization Theory, Social Identity Theory and Cultural Capital Theory may be used to anchor future studies on cultural heritage preservation. The study recommended enhancing community involvement, leveraging digital technologies, promoting sustainable tourism practices, strengthening legal and policy frameworks, encouraging international cooperation, and fostering education and public awareness. These recommendations aimed to ensure the active participation of local communities, utilize digital tools for wider access and documentation, balance the economic benefits of tourism with preservation needs, establish robust legal protections, facilitate international collaboration for shared knowledge and resources, and increase public understanding and appreciation of cultural heritage. These measures were suggested to effectively preserve cultural heritage in the face of globalization's challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球化背景下的文化遗产保护
目的:本研究的总体目标是探讨全球化背景下的文化遗产保护问题。研究方法:本研究采用案头研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地考察即可收集到的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及执行人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,全球化背景下的文化遗产保护在背景和方法上存在差距。初步的实证审查表明,全球化为文化遗产保护带来了机遇和挑战。它在促进文化交流和增加国际支持的同时,也导致了遗产地的商业化和潜在退化。经济压力和城市化构成了重大威胁,但社区参与和现代技术的使用提供了创新的解决方案。有效的保护需要一种平衡的方法,将可持续旅游业、全面的城市规划以及当地社区的力量结合起来,在全球影响下保护和促进文化特性。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:文化全球化理论、社会认同理论和文化资本理论可用于今后的文化遗产保护研究。该研究建议加强社区参与、利用数字技术、促进可持续旅游实践、加强法律和政策框架、鼓励国际合作以及促进教育和提高公众意识。这些建议旨在确保当地社区的积极参与,利用数字工具扩大获取和记录范围,平衡旅游业的经济效益和保护需求,建立健全的法律保护措施,促进国际合作以共享知识和资源,提高公众对文化遗产的理解和欣赏。建议采取这些措施,在全球化挑战面前有效保护文化遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and Construction of Bamboo Products and Rattan Accessories by the Local Artisans of Lahore Pakistan Bridging the Generational Gap between the Teachers and Students in the Utilization of Modern Technology in the Teaching Methods in Public Secondary Schools in Delta State Effects of Drug and Substance Abuse on Academic Performance among Secondary School Students, Kauma Subcounty, Kilifii County, Kenya The Role of Traditional Knowledge in Sustainable Development Impact of Political Instability on Social Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1