Pricing and green quality decisions in two-stage green supply chain for substitutable green products: a game-theoretic approach

Shivendra Kumar Gupta, Vinod Kumar Mishra
{"title":"Pricing and green quality decisions in two-stage green supply chain for substitutable green products: a game-theoretic approach","authors":"Shivendra Kumar Gupta, Vinod Kumar Mishra","doi":"10.1051/ro/2024143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing businesses are concerned with doing well both environmentally and economically. Pointing out this view, this paper explores the game theoretical approach (Stackelberg and Bertrand) for a two-echelon green supply chain where the duopolistic manufacturers produce two substitutable green products and sell their products through a common retailer. The demands for both green products are functions of the selling prices and green levels (GLs).  The effects of power structures on optimal price and green level decisions and associated equilibrium decisions are examined in three scenarios. Firstly, trilateral competition manufacturer-led Stackelberg (MS); secondly, retailer-led Stackelberg (RS); and thirdly, vertical collaboration, and compares the optimal decisions analytically. Our investigations show that, in addition to increasing the product's greening level, vertical collaboration creates a win-win situation for collaboration members, whereas the manufacturer outside the collaboration experiences a decline in profits. Additionally, we find that the overall profit from vertical collaboration is greater than the sum of the individual profits corresponding to two participants in the trilateral competition models (MS and RS). Further, a selection criterion is developed for retailer to select the most suitable manufacturer for vertical collaboration. Finally, a numerical example and a sensitivity analysis are performed to determine the impact of parameters.","PeriodicalId":506995,"journal":{"name":"RAIRO - Operations Research","volume":"57 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAIRO - Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing businesses are concerned with doing well both environmentally and economically. Pointing out this view, this paper explores the game theoretical approach (Stackelberg and Bertrand) for a two-echelon green supply chain where the duopolistic manufacturers produce two substitutable green products and sell their products through a common retailer. The demands for both green products are functions of the selling prices and green levels (GLs).  The effects of power structures on optimal price and green level decisions and associated equilibrium decisions are examined in three scenarios. Firstly, trilateral competition manufacturer-led Stackelberg (MS); secondly, retailer-led Stackelberg (RS); and thirdly, vertical collaboration, and compares the optimal decisions analytically. Our investigations show that, in addition to increasing the product's greening level, vertical collaboration creates a win-win situation for collaboration members, whereas the manufacturer outside the collaboration experiences a decline in profits. Additionally, we find that the overall profit from vertical collaboration is greater than the sum of the individual profits corresponding to two participants in the trilateral competition models (MS and RS). Further, a selection criterion is developed for retailer to select the most suitable manufacturer for vertical collaboration. Finally, a numerical example and a sensitivity analysis are performed to determine the impact of parameters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可替代绿色产品两阶段绿色供应链中的定价和绿色质量决策:博弈论方法
成长中的企业都希望在环保和经济两方面都做得很好。针对这一观点,本文探讨了双头绿色供应链的博弈论方法(Stackelberg 和 Bertrand),即双头垄断制造商生产两种可替代的绿色产品,并通过共同的零售商销售产品。对两种绿色产品的需求是销售价格和绿色水平(GLs)的函数。 我们在三种情况下考察了权力结构对最优价格和绿色水平决策以及相关均衡决策的影响。首先是制造商主导的斯塔克尔伯格三边竞争(MS);其次是零售商主导的斯塔克尔伯格三边竞争(RS);第三是纵向合作,并对最优决策进行了分析比较。我们的研究表明,纵向合作除了能提高产品的绿化水平外,还能为合作成员创造双赢局面,而合作外的制造商则会出现利润下降。此外,我们还发现,纵向合作的总体利润大于三边竞争模式(MS 和 RS)中两个参与者的单个利润之和。此外,我们还为零售商制定了一个选择标准,以便为纵向合作选择最合适的制造商。最后,通过数值示例和敏感性分析来确定参数的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big data service outsourcing and cost-sharing choices for the manufacturer Reinsurance contracts under Stackelberg game and market equilibrium Using the hybrid undesirable network data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the efficiency of Taiwan’s social care system The optimal decision of service provider considering extra waiting area value-added services---pooled or dedicated? Incentive mechanism for allocating wastewater discharge responsibility based on cooperative game theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1