Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Laboratory Techniques

IF 0.7 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.22207/jpam.18.3.02
H. K. Thakur, B. Tarai, Aradhana Bhargava, Sonu K. Agarwal, Pankaj Soni, Sudhakar Kancharla, Prachetha Kolli, Gowtham Mandadapu, M. Jena
{"title":"Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Laboratory Techniques","authors":"H. K. Thakur, B. Tarai, Aradhana Bhargava, Sonu K. Agarwal, Pankaj Soni, Sudhakar Kancharla, Prachetha Kolli, Gowtham Mandadapu, M. Jena","doi":"10.22207/jpam.18.3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hospitalized patients on mechanical ventilation are at high-risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), making early and accurate diagnosis essential for the best possible treatment outcomes. This review examined various laboratory techniques, such as aerobic cultures, Gram’s stain, and molecular techniques, to assess how well they diagnose VAP. We have done search strategies using Google Scholar, Medline Complete, and PubMed. Extensive statistical tools were utilized to examine studies and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory results. Multiplex PCR was superior to Gram’s stain and culture methods in terms of sensitivity (92%) and specificity (86%). On the other hand, Gram’s stain showed the highest specificity (78.9%) and the lowest sensitivity (74.6%). The results of semi-quantitative, quantitative, enrichment culture showed a lower specificity (75.97%) but a moderate sensitivity (78.5%). The most accurate diagnostic approach for VAP, according to a meta-analysis, was multiplex PCR-based testing, closely followed by culture methods. Beyond separate tests, multiplex PCR, culture, and Gram’s stain combination increased sensitivity. Prompt and precise VAP diagnosis is essential for efficient treatment. With possible improvements through combination diagnostic techniques, multiplex PCR remains the most accurate diagnostic tool. However, more investigation is necessary to improve and certify VAP diagnostic instruments.","PeriodicalId":16968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam.18.3.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospitalized patients on mechanical ventilation are at high-risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), making early and accurate diagnosis essential for the best possible treatment outcomes. This review examined various laboratory techniques, such as aerobic cultures, Gram’s stain, and molecular techniques, to assess how well they diagnose VAP. We have done search strategies using Google Scholar, Medline Complete, and PubMed. Extensive statistical tools were utilized to examine studies and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory results. Multiplex PCR was superior to Gram’s stain and culture methods in terms of sensitivity (92%) and specificity (86%). On the other hand, Gram’s stain showed the highest specificity (78.9%) and the lowest sensitivity (74.6%). The results of semi-quantitative, quantitative, enrichment culture showed a lower specificity (75.97%) but a moderate sensitivity (78.5%). The most accurate diagnostic approach for VAP, according to a meta-analysis, was multiplex PCR-based testing, closely followed by culture methods. Beyond separate tests, multiplex PCR, culture, and Gram’s stain combination increased sensitivity. Prompt and precise VAP diagnosis is essential for efficient treatment. With possible improvements through combination diagnostic techniques, multiplex PCR remains the most accurate diagnostic tool. However, more investigation is necessary to improve and certify VAP diagnostic instruments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸机相关肺炎的诊断 - 实验室技术的系统回顾和元分析
使用机械通气的住院病人是罹患呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的高危人群,因此早期准确诊断对于取得最佳治疗效果至关重要。本综述研究了各种实验室技术,如需氧培养、革兰氏染色和分子技术,以评估这些技术对 VAP 的诊断效果。我们使用 Google Scholar、Medline Complete 和 PubMed 进行了搜索。我们使用了大量的统计工具来研究和评估实验室结果的诊断准确性。就敏感性(92%)和特异性(86%)而言,多重 PCR 优于革兰氏染色法和培养法。另一方面,革兰氏染色法的特异性最高(78.9%),灵敏度最低(74.6%)。半定量、定量和富集培养的结果显示出较低的特异性(75.97%)和中等的敏感性(78.5%)。根据一项荟萃分析,VAP 最准确的诊断方法是基于多重 PCR 的检测,其次是培养方法。除单独检测外,多重 PCR、培养和革兰氏染色组合可提高灵敏度。及时准确的 VAP 诊断对有效治疗至关重要。通过综合诊断技术可能会有所改进,但多重 PCR 仍是最准确的诊断工具。然而,要改进和认证 VAP 诊断仪器,还需要进行更多的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
266
审稿时长
11 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology (JPAM) is a peer-reviewed, open access international journal of microbiology aims to advance and disseminate research among scientists, academics, clinicians and microbiologists around the world. JPAM publishes high-quality research in all aspects of microbiology in both online and print form on quarterly basis.
期刊最新文献
The Ability of the Indigenous Bacteria Chromobacterium haemolyticum strain W15 to Degrade Chromium (Cr) and Lead (Pb) in Liquid Coal Waste Enhancing Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Fruit Trees Using Microbial Biostimulants Isolation and Identification of Isolate, S1 with High Biotransformation Potential of Ferulic Acid to Vanillin Microbial Induced Biotechnological Processes for Biofuel Production from Waste Organics Conversion Enhancement of Plant Growth with Plant-Based Compost and the Heterotrophic Azotobacter and Streptomyces Inoculation under Greenhouse Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1