Differences in left and right lower limb control strategies in coping with visual tracking tasks during bipedal standing

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1421881
T. Minamisawa, N. Chiba, Eizaburo Suzuki
{"title":"Differences in left and right lower limb control strategies in coping with visual tracking tasks during bipedal standing","authors":"T. Minamisawa, N. Chiba, Eizaburo Suzuki","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1421881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differences in motor control between the lower limbs may influence the risk of sports injury and recovery from rehabilitation. In this study, differences in the visual feedback ability of the left and right lower limbs were assessed using visual target tracking tasks.Thirty-four healthy young subjects (aged 20.4 ± 1.2 years) were asked to move their bodies back and forth while tracking a visual target displayed on a monitor in front of them for 30 s. The two target motions were sinusoidal (i.e., predictable patterns) and more complex (random) patterns. To assess the ability of the lower limbs to follow visual target tracking, antero-posterior CoP (right limb, CoPap–r; left limb, CoPap–l) and medio-lateral CoP (right limb, CoPml–r; left limb, CoPml–l) data were measured using a stabilometer. Tracking ability by visual feedback ability was calculated as the difference in displacement between the target signal and the trajectories of the right and left pressure centers as trapezoidal areas, and a smaller sum of area (SoA) over the entire measurement time was defined as a greater tracking ability.Regarding the SoA in the anterior-posterior CoP, the mean SoA in the sinusoidal and random tasks was significantly lower in the CoP-r data than in the CoP-l data, indicating that the right lower limb had a more remarkable ability to follow visual target tracking. Regarding the SoA in the medial-lateral direction (CoP), the mean SoA in the sinusoidal and random tasks did not significantly differ between the two legs.The right lower limb may have a tracking function activated by the target signal when responding to visual stimuli. Identifying the motor strategies of each lower limb in response to visual stimuli will not only help identify potential differences between each lower limb but also suggest the possibility of enhancing the role of each lower limb in balance control.","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1421881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differences in motor control between the lower limbs may influence the risk of sports injury and recovery from rehabilitation. In this study, differences in the visual feedback ability of the left and right lower limbs were assessed using visual target tracking tasks.Thirty-four healthy young subjects (aged 20.4 ± 1.2 years) were asked to move their bodies back and forth while tracking a visual target displayed on a monitor in front of them for 30 s. The two target motions were sinusoidal (i.e., predictable patterns) and more complex (random) patterns. To assess the ability of the lower limbs to follow visual target tracking, antero-posterior CoP (right limb, CoPap–r; left limb, CoPap–l) and medio-lateral CoP (right limb, CoPml–r; left limb, CoPml–l) data were measured using a stabilometer. Tracking ability by visual feedback ability was calculated as the difference in displacement between the target signal and the trajectories of the right and left pressure centers as trapezoidal areas, and a smaller sum of area (SoA) over the entire measurement time was defined as a greater tracking ability.Regarding the SoA in the anterior-posterior CoP, the mean SoA in the sinusoidal and random tasks was significantly lower in the CoP-r data than in the CoP-l data, indicating that the right lower limb had a more remarkable ability to follow visual target tracking. Regarding the SoA in the medial-lateral direction (CoP), the mean SoA in the sinusoidal and random tasks did not significantly differ between the two legs.The right lower limb may have a tracking function activated by the target signal when responding to visual stimuli. Identifying the motor strategies of each lower limb in response to visual stimuli will not only help identify potential differences between each lower limb but also suggest the possibility of enhancing the role of each lower limb in balance control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双足站立时左右下肢控制策略在应对视觉跟踪任务时的差异
下肢运动控制能力的差异可能会影响运动损伤的风险和康复。本研究利用视觉目标跟踪任务评估了左右下肢视觉反馈能力的差异。34名健康的年轻受试者(年龄为20.4±1.2岁)被要求在跟踪前方显示器上显示的视觉目标的同时前后移动身体30秒。两种目标运动分别为正弦运动(即可预测的运动模式)和更复杂的运动(随机运动)。为了评估下肢跟踪视觉目标的能力,使用稳定计测量了前后CoP(右侧肢体,CoPap-r;左侧肢体,CoPap-l)和内外侧CoP(右侧肢体,CoPml-r;左侧肢体,CoPml-l)数据。在前后CoP的SoA方面,CoP-r数据在正弦任务和随机任务中的平均SoA显著低于CoP-l数据,表明右下肢的视觉目标跟踪能力更强。在内侧-外侧方向的SoA(CoP)方面,两条腿在正弦任务和随机任务中的平均SoA没有明显差异。确定每个下肢在对视觉刺激做出反应时的运动策略,不仅有助于确定每个下肢之间的潜在差异,而且还提出了加强每个下肢在平衡控制中的作用的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of conservative treatment strategies for iliotibial band syndrome on pain and function in runners: a systematic review. Identification of distinct physical activity profiles through adolescence: a longitudinal qualitative description study. Performing performance: young aspiring athletes' presentation of athletic identity. Validation of the basic need satisfaction for sport scale in Ethiopian athletes. Unlocking high-value football fans: unsupervised machine learning for customer segmentation and lifetime value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1