Comparative Study of Different Behavioral Management Techniques in Treating Anxious Pediatric Dental Patients

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_362_24
Z. Alkahtani
{"title":"Comparative Study of Different Behavioral Management Techniques in Treating Anxious Pediatric Dental Patients","authors":"Z. Alkahtani","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_362_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Pediatric dental anxiety poses a significant challenge in the delivery of dental care, often resulting in compromised treatment outcomes and negative experiences for both patients and dental professionals.\n \n \n \n A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted involving 120 pediatric dental patients aged 4 to 10 years old, presenting with varying degrees of dental anxiety. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A received tell-show-do (TSD) technique, Group B received audiovisual distraction (AVD), and Group C received non-pharmacological behavior guidance (NPBG). Anxiety levels were assessed using a standardized anxiety scale before and after the dental procedure. Patient cooperation during treatment, as well as dentist and parent satisfaction, was also evaluated.\n \n \n \n The study revealed significant reductions in anxiety levels across all groups post-treatment. However, Group B (AVD) demonstrated the most substantial reduction in anxiety scores, with a mean decrease of 60% from baseline. Group A (TSD) and Group C (NPBG) showed comparable reductions in anxiety levels, with mean decreases of 45% and 50%, respectively. Patient cooperation during treatment was highest in Group B, followed by Groups C and A. Dentist and parent satisfaction scores were significantly higher in Group B compared to the other groups.\n \n \n \n AVD emerged as the most effective behavioral management technique for treating anxious pediatric dental patients, resulting in significant reductions in anxiety levels and higher levels of patient cooperation during treatment compared to TSD and NPBG techniques.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":"42 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_362_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pediatric dental anxiety poses a significant challenge in the delivery of dental care, often resulting in compromised treatment outcomes and negative experiences for both patients and dental professionals. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted involving 120 pediatric dental patients aged 4 to 10 years old, presenting with varying degrees of dental anxiety. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A received tell-show-do (TSD) technique, Group B received audiovisual distraction (AVD), and Group C received non-pharmacological behavior guidance (NPBG). Anxiety levels were assessed using a standardized anxiety scale before and after the dental procedure. Patient cooperation during treatment, as well as dentist and parent satisfaction, was also evaluated. The study revealed significant reductions in anxiety levels across all groups post-treatment. However, Group B (AVD) demonstrated the most substantial reduction in anxiety scores, with a mean decrease of 60% from baseline. Group A (TSD) and Group C (NPBG) showed comparable reductions in anxiety levels, with mean decreases of 45% and 50%, respectively. Patient cooperation during treatment was highest in Group B, followed by Groups C and A. Dentist and parent satisfaction scores were significantly higher in Group B compared to the other groups. AVD emerged as the most effective behavioral management technique for treating anxious pediatric dental patients, resulting in significant reductions in anxiety levels and higher levels of patient cooperation during treatment compared to TSD and NPBG techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗儿童牙科焦虑症患者的不同行为管理技术比较研究
摘要 儿童牙科焦虑症是牙科治疗过程中的一个重大挑战,往往会影响治疗效果,给患者和牙科专业人员带来负面体验。 一项随机对照试验(RCT)涉及 120 名年龄在 4 到 10 岁之间、有不同程度牙科焦虑的儿童牙科患者。患者被随机分配到三组:A 组接受告诉-展示-做(TSD)技术,B 组接受视听分散(AVD),C 组接受非药物行为指导(NPBG)。在牙科治疗前后使用标准化焦虑量表评估焦虑水平。此外,还对患者在治疗过程中的合作情况以及牙医和家长的满意度进行了评估。 研究显示,所有组别在治疗后的焦虑水平都有明显下降。不过,B 组(AVD)的焦虑评分下降幅度最大,与基线相比平均下降了 60%。A组(TSD)和C组(NPBG)的焦虑水平下降幅度相当,平均降幅分别为45%和50%。B 组患者在治疗过程中的配合度最高,其次是 C 组和 A 组。与其他组相比,B 组的牙医和家长满意度得分明显更高。 与 TSD 和 NPBG 技术相比,AVD 是治疗儿童牙科焦虑症患者最有效的行为管理技术,能显著降低焦虑水平,提高患者在治疗过程中的配合度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Tele-Orthodontics in Enhancing Patient Compliance and Treatment Monitoring Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation in Dry Eye Syndrome: An In vitro Investigation Enhancing Precision in Endodontic Procedures: An In vitro Investigation of Magnification and Enhanced Visualization Comparative Evaluation of Surgical Techniques for Pterygium Management: An In Vitro Study Schoolchildren’s Musculoskeletal Pain and Backpack Weight Impact on Posture: A Short-Term Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1