Safeguarding the Rights of Children Living in Kinship Care in South Africa

H. Kruger
{"title":"Safeguarding the Rights of Children Living in Kinship Care in South Africa","authors":"H. Kruger","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a16680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By the early 2000s the practice of using the foster care system as a measure to subsidise the income of families who cared for the children of relatives was firmly entrenched in South Africa. This caused a rapid rise in the number of children receiving the foster child grant. By 2010 more than 500 000 foster child grants (FCGs) were in payment. The foster care system could not cope with this pressure, resulting in the lapsing of more than 110 000 foster child grants between April 2009 and March 2011. The High Court intervened at the request of the Centre for Child Law in Pretoria, placing a moratorium on the lapsing of foster care orders and giving the Department of Social Development (DSD) until December 2014 to come up with a \"comprehensive legal solution\" to solve the foster care crisis. The December 2014 deadline was extended four times, eventually until December 2022. The \"comprehensive legal solution\" that the North Gauteng High Court tasked the minister with in 2011 required amendments to both the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 and the Children's Act 38 of 2005. The first of these amendments, the Social Assistance Amendment Act 16 of 2020, came into effect on 30 May 2022 and the second, the Children's Amendment Act 17 of 2022, on 8 November 2023. This article considers the question whether the department's response to the so-called \"foster care crisis\" as contained in these Amendment Acts and their regulations complies with South Africa's obligations in terms of international law and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.","PeriodicalId":55857,"journal":{"name":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","volume":"52 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a16680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By the early 2000s the practice of using the foster care system as a measure to subsidise the income of families who cared for the children of relatives was firmly entrenched in South Africa. This caused a rapid rise in the number of children receiving the foster child grant. By 2010 more than 500 000 foster child grants (FCGs) were in payment. The foster care system could not cope with this pressure, resulting in the lapsing of more than 110 000 foster child grants between April 2009 and March 2011. The High Court intervened at the request of the Centre for Child Law in Pretoria, placing a moratorium on the lapsing of foster care orders and giving the Department of Social Development (DSD) until December 2014 to come up with a "comprehensive legal solution" to solve the foster care crisis. The December 2014 deadline was extended four times, eventually until December 2022. The "comprehensive legal solution" that the North Gauteng High Court tasked the minister with in 2011 required amendments to both the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 and the Children's Act 38 of 2005. The first of these amendments, the Social Assistance Amendment Act 16 of 2020, came into effect on 30 May 2022 and the second, the Children's Amendment Act 17 of 2022, on 8 November 2023. This article considers the question whether the department's response to the so-called "foster care crisis" as contained in these Amendment Acts and their regulations complies with South Africa's obligations in terms of international law and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护南非寄养儿童的权利
到本世纪初,利用寄养制度来补贴照顾亲属子女的家庭收入的做法在南非已根深蒂固。这导致领取寄养儿童补助金的儿童人数迅速增加。到 2010 年,领取寄养儿童补助金(FCGs)的人数已超过 50 万。寄养系统无法应对这一压力,导致 2009 年 4 月至 2011 年 3 月期间有超过 11 万份寄养儿童补助金失效。应比勒陀利亚儿童法律中心的请求,高等法院进行了干预,暂停寄养令的失效,并要求社会发展部(DSD)在 2014 年 12 月之前提出 "全面的法律解决方案",以解决寄养危机。2014 年 12 月的最后期限被延长了四次,最终延至 2022 年 12 月。北豪滕高等法院于 2011 年责成部长提出的 "全面法律解决方案 "要求对 2004 年第 13 号《社会援助法》和 2005 年第 38 号《儿童法》进行修订。其中第一项修正案,即 2020 年第 16 号《社会援助法修正案》于 2022 年 5 月 30 日生效,第二项修正案,即 2022 年第 17 号《儿童法修正案》于 2023 年 11 月 8 日生效。本文探讨的问题是,该部门对这些修正案及其条例中所载的所谓 "寄养危机 "的应对措施是否符 合南非在国际法和 1996 年《南非共和国宪法》方面的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: PELJ/PER publishes contributions relevant to development in the South African constitutional state. This means that most contributions will concern some aspect of constitutionalism or legal development. The fact that the South African constitutional state is the focus, does not limit the content of PELJ/PER to the South African legal system, since development law and constitutionalism are excellent themes for comparative work. Contributions on any aspect or discipline of the law from any part of the world are thus welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies in Online Dispute Resolution: A Solution to Consumer Disputes in South Africa? Safeguarding the Rights of Children Living in Kinship Care in South Africa "Cause of Action": How Could the Supreme Court of Appeal Get it so Wrong? Olesitse v Minister of Police (SCA) (Unreported) Case No: 470/2021 of 15 June 2022 Navigating Reputational Risks: Cautionary Considerations for South African Banks in the Unilateral Termination of Bank-Customer Relationships An Overview of the Extent of the Powers of South African Competition Authorities in the Regulation of Price Discrimination under the Competition Act 89 of 1998 in the Context of Digital Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1