The impact of COVID-19 on infodemic research: a bibliometric analysis of global publications

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 0 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library Hi Tech Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1108/lht-08-2023-0363
Hendy Abdullah Hendy Ahmed, I. Osman, Heba Mari
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 on infodemic research: a bibliometric analysis of global publications","authors":"Hendy Abdullah Hendy Ahmed, I. Osman, Heba Mari","doi":"10.1108/lht-08-2023-0363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeObjective is to investigate the effects of COVID-19 on the performance and productivity of infodemic research. A comprehensive bibliometric analysis is conducted using data extracted from Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, and the analysis is facilitated by the bibliometrix and biblioshiny tools.Design/methodology/approachData was extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) database provided by Thomson Reuters. Therefore, literature published outside of the WoS database was not included. Results were extracted about the Document Type, Research Area, Language, Publication year, and country or countries for all authors because this study was interested in scholarly international collaboration. The researcher also used the Thomson Reuters Web of Science’s InCites Essential Science Indicators database, which allowed the researcher to measure the scientific output performance of countries over a period of time. In addition to InCites data, citation data and international collaboration for all countries were also downloaded.FindingsInclusion and exclusion criteriax: this study focused on literature published by authors identified by each author’s affiliation in each publication. Thus, the WoS topic field was searched by “infodemic” or “information epidemic” or “info ebidemic”. The time span selected for this study started from 2018 to 2022, allowing the researcher to survey the nature of the literature during the last 6 years before COVID-19 and 4 years after COVID-19 to identify the effects of COVID-19 on research in the world regarding both performance and productivity. The study included various types of materials, such as articles, early access, and review articles.Originality/valueA comprehensive bibliometric analysis is conducted using data extracted from Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, and the analysis is facilitated by the bibliometrix and biblioshiny tools. The findings reveal that prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, researchers contributed a total of 3,960 documents, with the United States leading with 2,933 publications, followed by China with 2,561. However, the production of infodemic research doubled following the onset of the pandemic, resulting in a total of 6,979 documents. Both before and after COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":47196,"journal":{"name":"Library Hi Tech","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Hi Tech","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-08-2023-0363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeObjective is to investigate the effects of COVID-19 on the performance and productivity of infodemic research. A comprehensive bibliometric analysis is conducted using data extracted from Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, and the analysis is facilitated by the bibliometrix and biblioshiny tools.Design/methodology/approachData was extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) database provided by Thomson Reuters. Therefore, literature published outside of the WoS database was not included. Results were extracted about the Document Type, Research Area, Language, Publication year, and country or countries for all authors because this study was interested in scholarly international collaboration. The researcher also used the Thomson Reuters Web of Science’s InCites Essential Science Indicators database, which allowed the researcher to measure the scientific output performance of countries over a period of time. In addition to InCites data, citation data and international collaboration for all countries were also downloaded.FindingsInclusion and exclusion criteriax: this study focused on literature published by authors identified by each author’s affiliation in each publication. Thus, the WoS topic field was searched by “infodemic” or “information epidemic” or “info ebidemic”. The time span selected for this study started from 2018 to 2022, allowing the researcher to survey the nature of the literature during the last 6 years before COVID-19 and 4 years after COVID-19 to identify the effects of COVID-19 on research in the world regarding both performance and productivity. The study included various types of materials, such as articles, early access, and review articles.Originality/valueA comprehensive bibliometric analysis is conducted using data extracted from Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, and the analysis is facilitated by the bibliometrix and biblioshiny tools. The findings reveal that prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, researchers contributed a total of 3,960 documents, with the United States leading with 2,933 publications, followed by China with 2,561. However, the production of infodemic research doubled following the onset of the pandemic, resulting in a total of 6,979 documents. Both before and after COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 对信息学术研究的影响:对全球出版物的文献计量分析
目的研究 COVID-19 对信息学术研究的绩效和生产力的影响。使用从汤姆森路透社的科学网中提取的数据进行了全面的文献计量分析,并使用 bibliometrix 和 biblioshiny 工具进行了辅助分析。因此,不包括在 WoS 数据库之外发表的文献。由于本研究关注的是学术上的国际合作,因此提取了所有作者的文献类型、研究领域、语言、出版年份和国家的结果。研究人员还使用了汤森路透科学网的 InCites 基本科学指标数据库,通过该数据库,研究人员可以衡量各国在一段时间内的科学产出表现。除了 InCites 数据外,还下载了所有国家的引文数据和国际合作情况。研究结果纳入和排除标准x:本研究的重点是由作者发表的文献,作者在每篇出版物中的隶属关系均可识别。因此,在 WoS 主题字段中搜索的是 "infodemic "或 "info epidemic "或 "info ebidemic"。本研究选择的时间跨度从 2018 年至 2022 年,研究人员可以调查 COVID-19 之前 6 年和 COVID-19 之后 4 年的文献性质,以确定 COVID-19 在绩效和生产率方面对世界研究的影响。该研究包括各种类型的资料,如文章、早期获取和评论文章。原创性/价值利用从汤姆森路透社的科学网中提取的数据进行了全面的文献计量分析,并利用 bibliometrix 和 biblioshiny 工具促进了分析。研究结果显示,在 COVID-19 爆发之前,研究人员共发表了 3,960 篇文献,其中美国以 2,933 篇居首,中国以 2,561 篇紧随其后。然而,疫情爆发后,信息流行病研究的成果翻了一番,共发表了 6,979 篇文献。在 COVID-19 之前和之后都是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Library Hi Tech
Library Hi Tech INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
44.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: ■Integrated library systems ■Networking ■Strategic planning ■Policy implementation across entire institutions ■Security ■Automation systems ■The role of consortia ■Resource access initiatives ■Architecture and technology ■Electronic publishing ■Library technology in specific countries ■User perspectives on technology ■How technology can help disabled library users ■Library-related web sites
期刊最新文献
Role of higher education institutions in developing digital competence in Sultanate of Oman: a step towards achieving Vision 2040 The impact of COVID-19 on infodemic research: a bibliometric analysis of global publications Emerging technologies and higher education libraries: a bibliometric analysis of the global literature Unlocking the secrets of daily app switching: a comprehensive guide to mastering both intra-app and inter-app search strategies Perceived risks and use of social media for COVID-19 information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1