Correlation between the GRACE Risk Score and the SYNTAX Score in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

S. N. Huda, Mohammad Faisal, Ibn Kabir, MD. Tasnim MOSTASHIRUL HAQUE, Afm Azim Alam, Swadesh Kumar Anwar, SK SAHA, MD Nafis Kabir, MD. Fakrul H.N. ASHIQUR RAHMAN, Islam Khaled, Chaudhury TANJIMA PARVIN, MD. Rasul MESHKAT AHMED, Amin
{"title":"Correlation between the GRACE Risk Score and the SYNTAX Score in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction","authors":"S. N. Huda, Mohammad Faisal, Ibn Kabir, MD. Tasnim MOSTASHIRUL HAQUE, Afm Azim Alam, Swadesh Kumar Anwar, SK SAHA, MD Nafis Kabir, MD. Fakrul H.N. ASHIQUR RAHMAN, Islam Khaled, Chaudhury TANJIMA PARVIN, MD. Rasul MESHKAT AHMED, Amin","doi":"10.3329/uhj.v3i1.73749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The GRACE risk score is a valid clinical tool to risk stratify patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The SYNTAX score is a comprehensive angiographic grading tool to determine the anatomic complexity of coronary artery disease. Predicting the SYNTAX score before a coronary angiogram (CAG) can help with patient counseling, optimization of planning, and preparation for possible complex percutaneous procedures or CABG in patients with NSTEMI.\nObjective: The objective of this study is to determine the correlation between the GRACE risk score and the SYNTAX score in patients with NSTEMI.\nMaterials and Methods: A total of 52 patients with NSTEMI undergoing coronary angiography were enrolled in this study. According to the calculated GRACE score on admission, patients were divided into a low-risk group (GRACE score ≤108), an intermediate-risk group (GRACE score = 109–140), and a high-risk group\n(GRACE score > 140). After coronary angiography, the SYNTAX score was calculated. The correlation between the scores was determined by Pearson’s correlation test.\nResults: The mean SYNTAX score in the low GRACE risk group was 9.5 ± 5.1, in the intermediate GRACE risk group it was 12.5 ± 7.6, and in the high GRACE risk group it was 18.5 ± 8.9, and the differences were significant (P value = 0.005). There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.515, p = <0.001) between the GRACE risk score and the SYNTAX score in patients with NSTEMI.\nConclusion: Our study demonstrates that in NSTEMI patients, the GRACE risk score has a significant positive correlation with the SYNTAX score.\nUniversity Heart Journal 2023; 19(2): 49-54","PeriodicalId":23424,"journal":{"name":"University Heart Journal","volume":"124 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v3i1.73749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The GRACE risk score is a valid clinical tool to risk stratify patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The SYNTAX score is a comprehensive angiographic grading tool to determine the anatomic complexity of coronary artery disease. Predicting the SYNTAX score before a coronary angiogram (CAG) can help with patient counseling, optimization of planning, and preparation for possible complex percutaneous procedures or CABG in patients with NSTEMI. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the correlation between the GRACE risk score and the SYNTAX score in patients with NSTEMI. Materials and Methods: A total of 52 patients with NSTEMI undergoing coronary angiography were enrolled in this study. According to the calculated GRACE score on admission, patients were divided into a low-risk group (GRACE score ≤108), an intermediate-risk group (GRACE score = 109–140), and a high-risk group (GRACE score > 140). After coronary angiography, the SYNTAX score was calculated. The correlation between the scores was determined by Pearson’s correlation test. Results: The mean SYNTAX score in the low GRACE risk group was 9.5 ± 5.1, in the intermediate GRACE risk group it was 12.5 ± 7.6, and in the high GRACE risk group it was 18.5 ± 8.9, and the differences were significant (P value = 0.005). There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.515, p = <0.001) between the GRACE risk score and the SYNTAX score in patients with NSTEMI. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that in NSTEMI patients, the GRACE risk score has a significant positive correlation with the SYNTAX score. University Heart Journal 2023; 19(2): 49-54
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的 GRACE 风险评分与 SYNTAX 评分之间的相关性
背景:GRACE 风险评分是对非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者进行风险分层的有效临床工具。SYNTAX 评分是一种全面的血管造影分级工具,用于确定冠状动脉疾病的解剖复杂性。在冠状动脉造影(CAG)前预测 SYNTAX 评分有助于为 NSTEMI 患者提供患者咨询、优化计划并为可能的复杂经皮手术或 CABG 做好准备:本研究旨在确定 GRACE 风险评分与 SYNTAX 评分在 NSTEMI 患者中的相关性:本研究共纳入52名接受冠状动脉造影术的NSTEMI患者。根据入院时计算出的 GRACE 评分,患者被分为低危组(GRACE 评分 ≤108)、中危组(GRACE 评分 = 109-140)和高危组(GRACE 评分 > 140)。冠状动脉造影后,计算 SYNTAX 评分。得分之间的相关性通过皮尔逊相关检验确定:低GRACE风险组的平均SYNTAX评分为(9.5 ± 5.1)分,中GRACE风险组为(12.5 ± 7.6)分,高GRACE风险组为(18.5 ± 8.9)分,差异显著(P值= 0.005)。在NSTEMI患者中,GRACE风险评分与SYNTAX评分之间存在明显的正相关性(r = 0.515,P = <0.001):我们的研究表明,在NSTEMI患者中,GRACE风险评分与SYNTAX评分呈显著正相关:49-54
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Cardiac Troponin I Levels with the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Awareness on MINOCA Minimally Invasive Ascending Aortic Replacement with Concomitant Aortic Valve Replacement, A Case Report The outcome of Autogenous Venous Graft Vs Prosthetic Graft in Peripheral Arterial Disease- Study in Bangladesh Correlation between the GRACE Risk Score and the SYNTAX Score in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1