The Acari Hypothesis, IV: revisiting the role of hygiene in allergy

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2024.1415124
A. C. Retzinger, G. Retzinger
{"title":"The Acari Hypothesis, IV: revisiting the role of hygiene in allergy","authors":"A. C. Retzinger, G. Retzinger","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2024.1415124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Allergy and its manifestations were first appreciated in the 1870 s. Today, the mechanism by which specific substances elicit allergic reactions remains poorly understood. This is problematic from a healthcare perspective because the prevalence of allergic disease and its societal costs are substantial. Regarding mechanistic understanding of allergy, a new proposal, The Acari Hypothesis, has been forwarded. The Hypothesis, borne from consideration of alpha-gal syndrome, postulates that acarians, i.e., mites and ticks, are operative agents of allergy. By way of their pathogenic payloads and salivary pattern recognition receptor(s), acarians potentiate in human hosts the generation of IgE against acarian dietary elements. Those elements account for most, if not all, known human allergens. Inasmuch as acarian—human interactions occur on human epithelial surfaces, it is to be expected factors that influence the presence and/or operation of acarians on those surfaces influence the expression of allergic diseases. In this report, it is proposed that two adaptations of catarrhine primates, i.e., Old World monkeys, apes and humans, evolved to deter acarian species: firstly, the expansion of eccrine glands across the entirety of body surface area, and, secondly, the secretion of sweat by those glands. Contemporary hygienic practices that reduce and/or disrupt the operation of eccrine glands are likely responsible for the increase in allergic disease seen today.","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2024.1415124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Allergy and its manifestations were first appreciated in the 1870 s. Today, the mechanism by which specific substances elicit allergic reactions remains poorly understood. This is problematic from a healthcare perspective because the prevalence of allergic disease and its societal costs are substantial. Regarding mechanistic understanding of allergy, a new proposal, The Acari Hypothesis, has been forwarded. The Hypothesis, borne from consideration of alpha-gal syndrome, postulates that acarians, i.e., mites and ticks, are operative agents of allergy. By way of their pathogenic payloads and salivary pattern recognition receptor(s), acarians potentiate in human hosts the generation of IgE against acarian dietary elements. Those elements account for most, if not all, known human allergens. Inasmuch as acarian—human interactions occur on human epithelial surfaces, it is to be expected factors that influence the presence and/or operation of acarians on those surfaces influence the expression of allergic diseases. In this report, it is proposed that two adaptations of catarrhine primates, i.e., Old World monkeys, apes and humans, evolved to deter acarian species: firstly, the expansion of eccrine glands across the entirety of body surface area, and, secondly, the secretion of sweat by those glands. Contemporary hygienic practices that reduce and/or disrupt the operation of eccrine glands are likely responsible for the increase in allergic disease seen today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蛔虫假说之四:重新审视卫生在过敏症中的作用
19 世纪 70 年代,人们首次认识到过敏及其表现形式。如今,人们对特定物质引发过敏反应的机制仍然知之甚少。从医疗保健的角度来看,这是一个问题,因为过敏性疾病的发病率及其社会成本是巨大的。关于对过敏机理的理解,人们提出了一个新的建议,即 "蛔虫假说"(The Acari Hypothesis)。该假说源于对α-gal 综合征的研究,假定螨虫(即螨虫和蜱虫)是过敏症的致病因子。螨虫通过其致病载荷和唾液模式识别受体,促进人类宿主产生针对螨虫食物成分的 IgE。这些元素是大多数(如果不是全部的话)已知的人类过敏原。由于金合欢虫与人类的相互作用发生在人类上皮细胞表面,因此影响金合欢虫在这些表面的存在和/或活动的因素会影响过敏性疾病的表现。本报告提出,白喉类灵长类动物(即旧世界的猴、猿和人类)在进化过程中有两种适应性,以阻止螨类物种:第一,在整个体表面积上扩大肾上腺;第二,由这些腺体分泌汗液。当代的卫生习惯减少和/或破坏了泌尿生殖腺的功能,这很可能是导致当今过敏性疾病增加的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early life exposures of childhood asthma and allergies-an epidemiologic perspective. Editorial: The safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of allergen-specific oral immunotherapy. A retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy in patients treated with Alternaria alternata and Dermatophagoides farinae immunotherapy. The effect of the housing crisis in the Alabama Black Belt on respiratory health. Changes in epinephrine dispensings and allergy hospitalisations in Sweden in the years following the removal of autoinjector co-payments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1