Gaps in Long COVID treatments research: A scoping review

Stephanie Newton, Laura Davidson, Alice Norton, Anjum Memon, Louise Sigfrid
{"title":"Gaps in Long COVID treatments research: A scoping review","authors":"Stephanie Newton, Laura Davidson, Alice Norton, Anjum Memon, Louise Sigfrid","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21766.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Long COVID affects 6 to 10% of people following SARS-CoV-2 infection. It has been documented worldwide, with over 200 symptoms reported. This scoping review assesses the evidence on Long COVID treatments to identify gaps in the evidence-base to inform research prioritisation. Methods We searched four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane’s Trial register, Epistemonikos) supplemented by a grey literature search up to April 2023. Two reviewers screened articles and extracted data. Data were analysed using a thematic approach. Results Of 3675 records identified, 26 studies were included. Most were in high-income countries (92%), with two in upper-middle-income countries (8%). None reported inclusion of children, nor pregnant women and only 37.5% included adults over 64 years. Five (20.8%) presented ethnicity data, of these 92.9% of participants were of white ethnicity. Treatments included nutritional supplements (46%), conventional medicines (38%), hyperbaric medicine (8%), COVID-19 vaccination (4%) and complementary, alternative medicine (4%). Conclusion This scoping review highlights that more than four years after the start of the pandemic, research gaps remain for Long COVID treatments. There is a lack of research in low-income countries, despite trials being best placed locally to reflect different population demographics. There is a lack of inclusion of population sub-groups, particularly children, pregnant women and ethnic minority groups. Inclusion of these groups in future research is important given they may be at a higher risk of adverse outcomes of COVID-19, and a lack of appropriate treatments for Long COVID may contribute to the widening of health inequalities.","PeriodicalId":508490,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"28 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21766.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Long COVID affects 6 to 10% of people following SARS-CoV-2 infection. It has been documented worldwide, with over 200 symptoms reported. This scoping review assesses the evidence on Long COVID treatments to identify gaps in the evidence-base to inform research prioritisation. Methods We searched four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane’s Trial register, Epistemonikos) supplemented by a grey literature search up to April 2023. Two reviewers screened articles and extracted data. Data were analysed using a thematic approach. Results Of 3675 records identified, 26 studies were included. Most were in high-income countries (92%), with two in upper-middle-income countries (8%). None reported inclusion of children, nor pregnant women and only 37.5% included adults over 64 years. Five (20.8%) presented ethnicity data, of these 92.9% of participants were of white ethnicity. Treatments included nutritional supplements (46%), conventional medicines (38%), hyperbaric medicine (8%), COVID-19 vaccination (4%) and complementary, alternative medicine (4%). Conclusion This scoping review highlights that more than four years after the start of the pandemic, research gaps remain for Long COVID treatments. There is a lack of research in low-income countries, despite trials being best placed locally to reflect different population demographics. There is a lack of inclusion of population sub-groups, particularly children, pregnant women and ethnic minority groups. Inclusion of these groups in future research is important given they may be at a higher risk of adverse outcomes of COVID-19, and a lack of appropriate treatments for Long COVID may contribute to the widening of health inequalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长 COVID 治疗研究的空白:范围审查
背景 长 COVID 在感染 SARS-CoV-2 后会影响 6%到 10%的人。这种疾病在世界各地均有记录,报告的症状超过 200 种。本范围综述评估了有关长COVID治疗的证据,以确定证据库中的空白,为研究优先顺序的确定提供依据。方法 我们检索了四个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 试验登记、Epistemonikos),并辅以截至 2023 年 4 月的灰色文献检索。两名审稿人筛选文章并提取数据。采用专题方法对数据进行分析。结果 在确定的 3675 条记录中,共纳入了 26 项研究。大多数研究都在高收入国家(92%)进行,有两项研究在中上收入国家(8%)进行。没有一项研究报告纳入了儿童或孕妇,只有 37.5% 的研究纳入了 64 岁以上的成年人。五项研究(20.8%)提供了种族数据,其中 92.9% 的参与者为白人。治疗方法包括营养补充剂(46%)、传统药物(38%)、高压氧治疗(8%)、COVID-19 疫苗接种(4%)和补充、替代药物(4%)。结论 本次范围界定审查强调,在大流行开始四年多之后,对长 COVID 治疗方法的研究仍存在差距。在低收入国家缺乏研究,尽管在当地进行试验最能反映不同的人口构成。缺乏对人口亚群体的研究,尤其是儿童、孕妇和少数民族群体。将这些群体纳入未来的研究非常重要,因为他们可能面临更高的 COVID-19 不良后果风险,而且缺乏适当的长 COVID 治疗可能会导致健康不平等的扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The genome sequence of the bloodfluke planorb, Biomphalaria glabrata (Say, 1818) The genome sequence of the blonde ray, Raja brachyura Lafont, 1871 The genome sequence of the Northern Bottlenose Whale, Hyperoodon ampullatus (Forster, 1770) The genome sequence of the Maiden’s Blush moth, Cyclophora punctaria (Linnaeus, 1758) The genome sequence of a jewel beetle, Agrilus biguttatus (Fabricius, 1776)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1