Business education and its paradoxes: Linking business and biodiversity through critical pedagogy curriculum

IF 3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH British Educational Research Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1002/berj.4048
Helen Kopnina, Alice C. Hughes, Ruopiao (Scarlett) Zhang, Mike Russell, Engelbert Fellinger, Simon M. Smith, Les Tickner
{"title":"Business education and its paradoxes: Linking business and biodiversity through critical pedagogy curriculum","authors":"Helen Kopnina, Alice C. Hughes, Ruopiao (Scarlett) Zhang, Mike Russell, Engelbert Fellinger, Simon M. Smith, Les Tickner","doi":"10.1002/berj.4048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, launched during the United Nations Biodiversity Conference in December 2022, encourages governments, companies and investors to publish data on their nature‐related risks, dependencies and impacts. These disclosures are intended to drive businesses to recognise, manage and mitigate their reliance on ecosystem goods and services. However, there is a ‘biodiversity blind spot’ that is evident for most organisations and business schools. Business education rarely addresses the root causes of biodiversity loss, such as the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources. As the dominant positioning of Education for Sustainable Development Goals (ESDG) presents biodiversity in anthropocentric instrumental terms inadequate for addressing ecosystem decline, we posit that a more progressive and transformative ecocentric education through ecopedagogy and ecoliteracy is needed. Both approaches include the development of critical thinking about degrowth, the circular economy and conventional stakeholder theory to include non‐human stakeholders. Using comparative case studies from Northumbria University, the University of Hong Kong and Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, we illustrate how business education can be transformed to address biodiversity loss, providing theoretical guidance and practical recommendations to academic practitioners and future business leaders.","PeriodicalId":51410,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, launched during the United Nations Biodiversity Conference in December 2022, encourages governments, companies and investors to publish data on their nature‐related risks, dependencies and impacts. These disclosures are intended to drive businesses to recognise, manage and mitigate their reliance on ecosystem goods and services. However, there is a ‘biodiversity blind spot’ that is evident for most organisations and business schools. Business education rarely addresses the root causes of biodiversity loss, such as the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources. As the dominant positioning of Education for Sustainable Development Goals (ESDG) presents biodiversity in anthropocentric instrumental terms inadequate for addressing ecosystem decline, we posit that a more progressive and transformative ecocentric education through ecopedagogy and ecoliteracy is needed. Both approaches include the development of critical thinking about degrowth, the circular economy and conventional stakeholder theory to include non‐human stakeholders. Using comparative case studies from Northumbria University, the University of Hong Kong and Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, we illustrate how business education can be transformed to address biodiversity loss, providing theoretical guidance and practical recommendations to academic practitioners and future business leaders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业教育及其悖论:通过批判教学法课程将商业与生物多样性联系起来
在 2022 年 12 月联合国生物多样性大会期间推出的昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架鼓励政府、公司和投资者公布其与自然相关的风险、依赖性和影响的数据。这些披露旨在推动企业认识、管理和减轻其对生态系统产品和服务的依赖。然而,大多数组织和商学院都存在明显的 "生物多样性盲点"。商业教育很少涉及生物多样性丧失的根本原因,如不可持续的自然资源开发。由于可持续发展目标教育(ESDG)的主要定位是以人类为中心的工具性术语来介绍生物多样性,不足以解决生态系统衰退的问题,因此我们认为需要通过生态教育学和生态扫盲来开展更先进、更具变革性的生态中心教育。这两种方法都包括发展有关降解增长、循环经济和传统利益相关者理论的批判性思维,以纳入非人类利益相关者。通过对诺森比亚大学、香港大学和阿姆斯特丹应用科学大学的比较案例研究,我们阐述了如何转变商业教育以解决生物多样性丧失问题,为学术从业者和未来的商业领袖提供理论指导和实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Educational Research Journal
British Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The British Educational Research Journal is an international peer reviewed medium for the publication of articles of interest to researchers in education and has rapidly become a major focal point for the publication of educational research from throughout the world. For further information on the association please visit the British Educational Research Association web site. The journal is interdisciplinary in approach, and includes reports of case studies, experiments and surveys, discussions of conceptual and methodological issues and of underlying assumptions in educational research, accounts of research in progress, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Making it explicit – Sustained shared thinking dialogue as a way to explore children's perspectives on quality in German early childhood education and care Issue Information Personality‐sensitive pedagogies: A study of small group interactive behaviours among 9‐ to 10‐year‐olds The QAA's subject benchmarks and critical pedagogy: The example of ‘gateway to King's’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1