How Botswana and Mauritius Exited the EU High-Risk Third Country List by Adapting Their Approaches to Beneficial Ownership and Residence

Daniel Walker
{"title":"How Botswana and Mauritius Exited the EU High-Risk Third Country List by Adapting Their Approaches to Beneficial Ownership and Residence","authors":"Daniel Walker","doi":"10.53300/001c.120759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 22 February 2022, the Mauritian Ministry of Financial Services and Good Governance issued a communique reporting the country’s removal from the European Union (‘EU’) List of High-Risk Third Countries. This list is also called the Anti-money Laundering and Countering Terrorist Financing List (‘AML/CTF’); or, less affectionately, the Blacklist. Mauritius issued this report a month after the European Union released its Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/229, removing Botswana and Mauritius from the AML/CTF. The EU placed Mauritius and Botswana on the Blacklist in May 2020 after adopting updated criteria for assessing high-risk third countries and publishing its revised methodology for identifying these high-risk jurisdictions. These updated criteria and procedures relegated the tax regimes of Mauritius and Botswana as strategically ‘[deficient] on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing…,’ such that they ‘pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union.’ Placement on the Blacklist encumbers States with increased monitoring, regulatory requirements, and global trade restrictions that can result in a heavy economic toll. Moreover, to exit the list, countries must remediate deficiencies in cooperation with the EU and Financial Action Task Force (‘FATF’), each of which must be satisfied with the improvements made. Mauritius and Botswana passed a bevy of substantial laws in just over a year to satisfy the EU and FATF, earning an exit from the Blacklist. Among the many changes, enhancements to each country’s transparency measures were central. Adopting new approaches to beneficial ownership and residence in each country is at the core of this transparency. This work will explore how Mauritius and Botswana leveraged new approaches to beneficial ownership and residence to meet EU standards for tax regime transparency, resulting in each country’s removal from the EU Blacklist. This analysis will begin with an economic overview of Mauritius and Botswana. What follows will be an introduction to the EU AML/CTF list, followed by how and why the EU placed Mauritius and Botswana on the list. Finally, this work will look at how Mauritius and Botswana exited the list, and what that exit means for each country and other countries like them.","PeriodicalId":306257,"journal":{"name":"Revenue Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revenue Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.120759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 22 February 2022, the Mauritian Ministry of Financial Services and Good Governance issued a communique reporting the country’s removal from the European Union (‘EU’) List of High-Risk Third Countries. This list is also called the Anti-money Laundering and Countering Terrorist Financing List (‘AML/CTF’); or, less affectionately, the Blacklist. Mauritius issued this report a month after the European Union released its Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/229, removing Botswana and Mauritius from the AML/CTF. The EU placed Mauritius and Botswana on the Blacklist in May 2020 after adopting updated criteria for assessing high-risk third countries and publishing its revised methodology for identifying these high-risk jurisdictions. These updated criteria and procedures relegated the tax regimes of Mauritius and Botswana as strategically ‘[deficient] on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing…,’ such that they ‘pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union.’ Placement on the Blacklist encumbers States with increased monitoring, regulatory requirements, and global trade restrictions that can result in a heavy economic toll. Moreover, to exit the list, countries must remediate deficiencies in cooperation with the EU and Financial Action Task Force (‘FATF’), each of which must be satisfied with the improvements made. Mauritius and Botswana passed a bevy of substantial laws in just over a year to satisfy the EU and FATF, earning an exit from the Blacklist. Among the many changes, enhancements to each country’s transparency measures were central. Adopting new approaches to beneficial ownership and residence in each country is at the core of this transparency. This work will explore how Mauritius and Botswana leveraged new approaches to beneficial ownership and residence to meet EU standards for tax regime transparency, resulting in each country’s removal from the EU Blacklist. This analysis will begin with an economic overview of Mauritius and Botswana. What follows will be an introduction to the EU AML/CTF list, followed by how and why the EU placed Mauritius and Botswana on the list. Finally, this work will look at how Mauritius and Botswana exited the list, and what that exit means for each country and other countries like them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博茨瓦纳和毛里求斯如何通过调整实益拥有权和居住权方法退出欧盟高风险第三国名单
2022 年 2 月 22 日,毛里求斯金融服务和善治部发布公报,宣布该国已从欧洲联盟("欧盟")高风险第三国名单中除名。这份名单也被称为 "反洗钱与反恐融资名单"(AML/CTF),或者不那么亲切地称为 "黑名单"。毛里求斯是在欧盟发布第 2022/229 号委员会授权条例(EU),将博茨瓦纳和毛里求斯从反洗钱/反恐融资名单中除名一个月后发布这份报告的。欧盟于 2020 年 5 月将毛里求斯和博茨瓦纳列入黑名单,此前欧盟通过了评估高风险第三国的最新标准,并公布了确定这些高风险辖区的修订方法。这些更新的标准和程序将毛里求斯和博茨瓦纳的税收制度降级为 "在反洗钱和反恐融资......方面存在战略[缺陷]",因此它们 "对欧盟的金融体系构成重大威胁"。被列入 "黑名单 "的国家需要接受更多的监督、监管要求和全球贸易限制,这可能会造成严重的经济损失。此外,要想退出黑名单,各国必须与欧盟和金融行动特别工作组(FATF)合作弥补不足之处,而欧盟和金融行动特别工作组都必须对各国所做的改进表示满意。毛里求斯和博茨瓦纳在短短一年多的时间里通过了一系列实质性法律,令欧盟和 FATF 满意,从而退出了黑名单。在众多变革中,加强两国的透明度措施至关重要。各国采用新方法处理受益所有权和居住地问题是透明度的核心。本报告将探讨毛里求斯和博茨瓦纳如何利用新的实益拥有权和居住地方法来达到欧盟的税制透明度标准,从而使两国从欧盟黑名单中除名。分析将从毛里求斯和博茨瓦纳的经济概况开始。接下来将介绍欧盟反洗钱/跨国犯罪框架名单,然后介绍欧盟如何以及为何将毛里求斯和博茨瓦纳列入该名单。最后,本报告将探讨毛里求斯和博茨瓦纳是如何退出名单的,以及退出名单对两国及类似国家的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Botswana and Mauritius Exited the EU High-Risk Third Country List by Adapting Their Approaches to Beneficial Ownership and Residence A Curious Concession? Australia’s Withholding Tax Exemption for Franked Dividends Australian Transfer-Pricing in the Aftermath of Glencore Investment Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (2019) A Review of How America was Tricked on Tax Policy: Secrets and Undisclosed Practices by Bret N. Bogenschneider Australia’s Tax Law Policy of the Past and that of the Post Digital Revolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1