Fludarabine, busulfan, and melphalan conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with myeloid malignancies: A multicenter retrospective study

EJHaem Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1002/jha2.947
Jieling Jiang, Xiaofan Li, Dong Wu, Quanyi Lu, Kourong Miao, Houcai Wang, Xiaoping Li, Yingnian Chen, Shiyuan Zhou, Yali Zhou, Guiping Liao, Chuanhe Jiang, Xiaohong Yuan, Youshan Zhao, Chunkang Chang, Jie Chen, Han Zhu, Ruye Ma, Nainong Li, Xiaolin Yin, Xiaojin Wu, Sanbin Wang, Chun Wang, Jiong Hu
{"title":"Fludarabine, busulfan, and melphalan conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with myeloid malignancies: A multicenter retrospective study","authors":"Jieling Jiang,&nbsp;Xiaofan Li,&nbsp;Dong Wu,&nbsp;Quanyi Lu,&nbsp;Kourong Miao,&nbsp;Houcai Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoping Li,&nbsp;Yingnian Chen,&nbsp;Shiyuan Zhou,&nbsp;Yali Zhou,&nbsp;Guiping Liao,&nbsp;Chuanhe Jiang,&nbsp;Xiaohong Yuan,&nbsp;Youshan Zhao,&nbsp;Chunkang Chang,&nbsp;Jie Chen,&nbsp;Han Zhu,&nbsp;Ruye Ma,&nbsp;Nainong Li,&nbsp;Xiaolin Yin,&nbsp;Xiaojin Wu,&nbsp;Sanbin Wang,&nbsp;Chun Wang,&nbsp;Jiong Hu","doi":"10.1002/jha2.947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Relapse remains the main cause of treatment failure in patients with myeloid malignancies even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We observed a particularly low incidence of relapse in patients prepared with fludarabine, busulfan and melphalan in our previous study and this multicenter retrospective analysis aimed to confirm the feasibility of the regimen and to identify the potential prognostic factors. This study was performed using registry data from adults patients with myeloid malignancies who underwent their first allo-HSCT following fludarabine(≥100 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), busulfan (≥3.2 mg/kg) and melphalan (≥100 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) based conditioning at nine transplantation centers in China between Jan. 2020 and Mar. 2022. A total of 221 consecutive patients (AML <i>n</i> = 171, MDS-IB-1 or 2 <i>n</i> = 44, CMML <i>n</i> = 6) with median age of 46 were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 507 days for survivors. The 2-year NRM, CIR, OS and DFS were 10.6% ± 2.2%, 14.8% ± 3.3%, 79.4% ± 3.7% and 74.6% ± 3.7%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, high HCT-CI (≥3) was the only independent factor for higher NRM [hazard ratio (HR), 2.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11 to 7.90; <i>p</i> = 0.030] and ECOG score ≥2 was the only independent factor for inferior OS (HR, 2.43; 95%CI, 1.15 to 5.16; <i>p</i> = 0.020) and DFS (HR, 2.12; 95%CI, 1.13 to 4.02; <i>p</i> = 0.020). AML diagnosis and positive measurable residual disease (MRD) at transplantation were predictors for higher CIR (HR = 7.92, 95%CI 1.05-60.03, <i>p</i> = 0.045; HR = 3.64, 95%CI 1.40-9.44, <i>p</i> = 0.008; respectively), while post-transplantation cyclophosphamide based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was associated with lower CIR (HR = 0.24 95%CI 0.11-0.54, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The intensity of conditioning regimen did not impact CIR, NRM, DFS and OS. These results supported that double alkylating agents of busulfan and melphalan based conditioning regimens were associated with low relapse rate and acceptable NRM in adult patients with myeloid malignancies. The optimal dose remained to be confirmed by further prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.947","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relapse remains the main cause of treatment failure in patients with myeloid malignancies even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We observed a particularly low incidence of relapse in patients prepared with fludarabine, busulfan and melphalan in our previous study and this multicenter retrospective analysis aimed to confirm the feasibility of the regimen and to identify the potential prognostic factors. This study was performed using registry data from adults patients with myeloid malignancies who underwent their first allo-HSCT following fludarabine(≥100 mg/m2), busulfan (≥3.2 mg/kg) and melphalan (≥100 mg/m2) based conditioning at nine transplantation centers in China between Jan. 2020 and Mar. 2022. A total of 221 consecutive patients (AML n = 171, MDS-IB-1 or 2 n = 44, CMML n = 6) with median age of 46 were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 507 days for survivors. The 2-year NRM, CIR, OS and DFS were 10.6% ± 2.2%, 14.8% ± 3.3%, 79.4% ± 3.7% and 74.6% ± 3.7%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, high HCT-CI (≥3) was the only independent factor for higher NRM [hazard ratio (HR), 2.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11 to 7.90; p = 0.030] and ECOG score ≥2 was the only independent factor for inferior OS (HR, 2.43; 95%CI, 1.15 to 5.16; p = 0.020) and DFS (HR, 2.12; 95%CI, 1.13 to 4.02; p = 0.020). AML diagnosis and positive measurable residual disease (MRD) at transplantation were predictors for higher CIR (HR = 7.92, 95%CI 1.05-60.03, p = 0.045; HR = 3.64, 95%CI 1.40-9.44, p = 0.008; respectively), while post-transplantation cyclophosphamide based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was associated with lower CIR (HR = 0.24 95%CI 0.11-0.54, p = 0.001). The intensity of conditioning regimen did not impact CIR, NRM, DFS and OS. These results supported that double alkylating agents of busulfan and melphalan based conditioning regimens were associated with low relapse rate and acceptable NRM in adult patients with myeloid malignancies. The optimal dose remained to be confirmed by further prospective studies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髓系恶性肿瘤成年患者异基因造血干细胞移植中的氟达拉滨、丁硫安和美法仑调理方案:多中心回顾性研究
即使在异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后,复发仍是骨髓恶性肿瘤患者治疗失败的主要原因。我们在之前的研究中观察到,使用氟达拉滨、丁硫安和美法仑治疗的患者复发率特别低,这项多中心回顾性分析旨在证实该方案的可行性,并找出潜在的预后因素。本研究使用了2020年1月至2022年3月期间在中国9个移植中心接受氟达拉滨(≥100 mg/m2)、丁硫(≥3.2 mg/kg)和美法仑(≥100 mg/m2)调理后首次allo-HSCT的髓系恶性肿瘤成人患者的登记数据。本研究共纳入221例连续患者(AML n = 171例,MDS-IB-1或2 n = 44例,CMML n = 6例),中位年龄为46岁。幸存者的中位随访时间为 507 天。2年NRM、CIR、OS和DFS分别为10.6%±2.2%、14.8%±3.3%、79.4%±3.7%和74.6%±3.7%。在多变量分析中,高HCT-CI(≥3)是较高NRM的唯一独立因素[危险比(HR),2.96;95%置信区间(CI),1.11至7.90;P = 0.030],ECOG评分≥2是较差OS(HR,2.43;95%CI,1.15至5.16;P = 0.020)和DFS(HR,2.12;95%CI,1.13至4.02;P = 0.020)的唯一独立因素。急性髓细胞性白血病诊断和移植时可测量残留病(MRD)阳性是较高CIR的预测因素(分别为HR = 7.92,95%CI 1.05-60.03,p = 0.045;HR = 3.64,95%CI 1.40-9.44,p = 0.008;),而移植后基于环磷酰胺的移植物抗宿主病预防与较低的CIR相关(HR = 0.24 95%CI 0.11-0.54,p = 0.001)。调理方案的强度对CIR、NRM、DFS和OS没有影响。这些结果表明,在成年髓系恶性肿瘤患者中,以布磺胺和美法仑为基础的双烷基化药物调理方案具有较低的复发率和可接受的NRM。最佳剂量仍有待进一步的前瞻性研究证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Optimisation of the Danish national haemoglobinopathy screening programme – A prospective intervention study A phase 1 trial of venetoclax in combination with liposomal vincristine in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell or T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results from the ECOG‐ACRIN EA9152 protocol Unveiling the nephrotoxic profile of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A real-world experience in Africa IDH2 mutation accelerates TPO-induced myelofibrosis with enhanced S100a8/a9 and NFκB signaling in vivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1