Improving Documentation of and Access to Diabetic Retinopathy Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic

Aleksandra Zarska, Sharmi Amin, Joshua R Ehrlich, Hari Conjeevaram
{"title":"Improving Documentation of and Access to Diabetic Retinopathy Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic","authors":"Aleksandra Zarska, Sharmi Amin, Joshua R Ehrlich, Hari Conjeevaram","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) affects approximately 9.6 million people in the United States (US) and is the leading cause of vision loss in working-age adults. However, less than 50% of people with diabetes in the US undergo the recommended screening. We aimed to assess need for DR screening (DRS) at the University of Michigan Student-Run Free Clinic (UMSRFC) and examine current DRS documentation practices to inform quality improvement initiatives at the clinic. \nMethods: We conducted a needs-assessment survey of 67 patients to examine access to eye and vision care among patients seen at the UMSRFC between January and April 2023. Descriptive analysis of survey data was performed. A retrospective chart review of all patients seen at the clinic between March 2021 and March 2023 was conducted to evaluate documentation of DRS in the medical record. These results informed the development of a DRS initiative at the clinic. \nResults: Of the 67 patients surveyed, 17 had a diagnosis of diabetes. Twenty-six patients reported an eye problem, of which 16 (62.0%) reported blurry vision, 9 (35.0%) reported floaters, and 1 (4.0%) reported dark/empty areas in their vision. Chart review yielded 404 patients, of which 70 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Twenty-eight (40.0%) had any mention of a diabetic eye exam in their chart, and 12 of these were up to date with the American Diabetes Association (ADA) screening guidelines. Twenty-three (33.0%) patients had any mention of a referral to an optometrist or ophthalmologist in their chart. On the DRS day, three patients were screened for DR. No cases of DR were identified. \nConclusion: Survey and chart review data indicated a need for increased DRS and improved documentation practices of DRS at the UMSRFC. A DRS initiative was successfully implemented at the UMSRFC under the oversight of an ophthalmologist.","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) affects approximately 9.6 million people in the United States (US) and is the leading cause of vision loss in working-age adults. However, less than 50% of people with diabetes in the US undergo the recommended screening. We aimed to assess need for DR screening (DRS) at the University of Michigan Student-Run Free Clinic (UMSRFC) and examine current DRS documentation practices to inform quality improvement initiatives at the clinic. Methods: We conducted a needs-assessment survey of 67 patients to examine access to eye and vision care among patients seen at the UMSRFC between January and April 2023. Descriptive analysis of survey data was performed. A retrospective chart review of all patients seen at the clinic between March 2021 and March 2023 was conducted to evaluate documentation of DRS in the medical record. These results informed the development of a DRS initiative at the clinic. Results: Of the 67 patients surveyed, 17 had a diagnosis of diabetes. Twenty-six patients reported an eye problem, of which 16 (62.0%) reported blurry vision, 9 (35.0%) reported floaters, and 1 (4.0%) reported dark/empty areas in their vision. Chart review yielded 404 patients, of which 70 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Twenty-eight (40.0%) had any mention of a diabetic eye exam in their chart, and 12 of these were up to date with the American Diabetes Association (ADA) screening guidelines. Twenty-three (33.0%) patients had any mention of a referral to an optometrist or ophthalmologist in their chart. On the DRS day, three patients were screened for DR. No cases of DR were identified. Conclusion: Survey and chart review data indicated a need for increased DRS and improved documentation practices of DRS at the UMSRFC. A DRS initiative was successfully implemented at the UMSRFC under the oversight of an ophthalmologist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善学生开办的免费诊所的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查记录和获取途径
背景:美国约有 960 万人患有糖尿病视网膜病变(DR),这是导致工作年龄成年人视力下降的主要原因。然而,美国只有不到 50% 的糖尿病患者接受了建议的筛查。我们的目的是评估密歇根大学学生免费诊所(UMSRFC)对 DR 筛选(DRS)的需求,并检查当前 DRS 的记录方法,为诊所的质量改进措施提供信息。方法:我们对 67 名患者进行了需求评估调查,以了解 2023 年 1 月至 4 月期间在 UMSRFC 就诊的患者获得眼科和视力保健的情况。我们对调查数据进行了描述性分析。对 2021 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在该诊所就诊的所有患者进行了回顾性病历审查,以评估病历中 DRS 的记录情况。这些结果为诊所制定 DRS 计划提供了依据。结果:在接受调查的 67 名患者中,17 人被诊断患有糖尿病。26 名患者报告了眼部问题,其中 16 人(62.0%)报告了视力模糊,9 人(35.0%)报告了浮游物,1 人(4.0%)报告了视力黑暗/空洞区域。病历检查共发现 404 名患者,其中 70 人被诊断为 2 型糖尿病。有 28 名患者(40.0%)的病历中曾提及进行过糖尿病眼科检查,其中 12 人符合美国糖尿病协会 (ADA) 的最新筛查指南。23名患者(33.0%)的病历中提到了转诊至验光师或眼科医生。在 DRS 日,对三名患者进行了 DR 筛查。未发现任何 DR 病例。结论调查和病历审查数据表明,有必要在 UMSRFC 增加 DRS 并改进 DRS 的记录方法。在眼科医生的监督下,UMSRFC 成功实施了 DRS 计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Otolaryngology in Medical Education: Hands-on Training at an SRFC Community Site Improves Medical Student Knowledge and Skills Improving Documentation of and Access to Diabetic Retinopathy Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic Success and Challenges of Establishing a Teledermatology Pilot Service at a Student-Run Clinic Pushing and Establishing New Frontiers: An Examination of Publication Patterns From 2015-2023 in the Journal of Student-Run Clinics Standardization of Clinic Flow to Improve Patient Experience in a Student-Run Free Clinic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1