Artificial Intelligence-based ECG Analysis Improves Atrial Arrhythmia Detection from a smartwatch ECG

L. Fiorina, P. Chemaly, J. Cellier, Mina Ait Said, Charlène Coquard, S. Younsi, F. Salerno, Jérôme Horvilleur, Jérôme Lacotte, Vladimir Manenti, A. Plesse, C. Henry, B. Lefebvre
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-based ECG Analysis Improves Atrial Arrhythmia Detection from a smartwatch ECG","authors":"L. Fiorina, P. Chemaly, J. Cellier, Mina Ait Said, Charlène Coquard, S. Younsi, F. Salerno, Jérôme Horvilleur, Jérôme Lacotte, Vladimir Manenti, A. Plesse, C. Henry, B. Lefebvre","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Smartwatch ECGs have been identified as a noninvasive solution to assess abnormal heart rhythm, especially atrial arrhythmias which are related to stroke risk. However, the performance of these tools is limited and could be improved with the use of Deep Neural Network algorithms, particularly for specific populations encountered in clinical cardiology practice.\n \n \n \n 400 patients from the electrophysiology department of one tertiary care hospital have been included in two similar clinical trials (respectively 200 patients per study). Simultaneous ECG were recorded with the watch and a 12-lead recording system during consultation or before and after an electrophysiology procedure if any. The smartwatch ECGs were processed by the deep neural network and by the Apple watch ECG software (Apple app). Corresponding 12-lead ECGs were adjudicated by an expert electrophysiologist. The performance of the deep neural network was assessed versus the expert interpretation of the 12-lead ECG and inconclusive rates reported.\n \n \n \n Overall, the deep neural network and the Apple app presented respectively a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 85–95%) and 61% (95% CI: 44–75%) with a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 91–97%) and 97% (95% CI: 93–99%) when compared to physician 12-lead ECG interpretation. The deep neural network was able to provide a diagnosis on 99% of ECGs while the Apple app was only able to classify 78% of strips (22% of inconclusive diagnosis).\n \n \n \n In this study, including patients from a cardiology department, a deep neural network-based algorithm applied to a smartwatch ECG provided an accurate diagnosis regarding atrial arrhythmia detection on virtually all tracings, outperforming the Smartwatch algorithm.\n","PeriodicalId":508387,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smartwatch ECGs have been identified as a noninvasive solution to assess abnormal heart rhythm, especially atrial arrhythmias which are related to stroke risk. However, the performance of these tools is limited and could be improved with the use of Deep Neural Network algorithms, particularly for specific populations encountered in clinical cardiology practice. 400 patients from the electrophysiology department of one tertiary care hospital have been included in two similar clinical trials (respectively 200 patients per study). Simultaneous ECG were recorded with the watch and a 12-lead recording system during consultation or before and after an electrophysiology procedure if any. The smartwatch ECGs were processed by the deep neural network and by the Apple watch ECG software (Apple app). Corresponding 12-lead ECGs were adjudicated by an expert electrophysiologist. The performance of the deep neural network was assessed versus the expert interpretation of the 12-lead ECG and inconclusive rates reported. Overall, the deep neural network and the Apple app presented respectively a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 85–95%) and 61% (95% CI: 44–75%) with a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 91–97%) and 97% (95% CI: 93–99%) when compared to physician 12-lead ECG interpretation. The deep neural network was able to provide a diagnosis on 99% of ECGs while the Apple app was only able to classify 78% of strips (22% of inconclusive diagnosis). In this study, including patients from a cardiology department, a deep neural network-based algorithm applied to a smartwatch ECG provided an accurate diagnosis regarding atrial arrhythmia detection on virtually all tracings, outperforming the Smartwatch algorithm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能的心电图分析改进了从智能手表心电图中检测房性心律失常的能力
智能手表心电图已被确定为评估异常心律的无创解决方案,尤其是与中风风险相关的房性心律失常。然而,这些工具的性能有限,可以通过使用深度神经网络算法加以改进,特别是针对临床心脏病学实践中遇到的特定人群。 一家三级医院电生理学部门的 400 名患者被纳入两项类似的临床试验(每项研究分别有 200 名患者)。在就诊期间或进行电生理学手术前后,使用手表和 12 导联记录系统同时记录心电图。智能手表心电图由深度神经网络和苹果手表心电图软件(苹果应用程序)处理。相应的 12 导联心电图由一位电生理专家判定。深度神经网络的性能与专家对 12 导联心电图的判读进行了对比评估,并报告了不确定率。 总体而言,与医生的 12 导联心电图判读相比,深度神经网络和苹果应用程序的灵敏度分别为 91% (95% CI: 85-95%) 和 61% (95% CI: 44-75%),特异性分别为 95% (95% CI: 91-97%) 和 97% (95% CI: 93-99%)。深度神经网络能对 99% 的心电图做出诊断,而苹果应用只能对 78% 的条带进行分类(22% 的诊断不确定)。 在这项包括心脏病科患者在内的研究中,应用于智能手表心电图的基于深度神经网络的算法几乎对所有描记提供了有关房性心律失常检测的准确诊断,表现优于智能手表算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting early-stage coronary artery disease using machine learning and routine clinical biomarkers improved by augmented virtual data Why Thorough Open Data Descriptions Matters More Than Ever in the Age of AI: Opportunities for Cardiovascular Research Meet Key Digital Health thought leaders: Jagmeet (Jag) Singh Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year all-cause mortality in patients undergoing CRT implantation: Validation of the SEMMELWEIS-CRT score in the European CRT Survey I dataset Effect of Urban Environment on Cardiovascular Health: A Feasibility Pilot Study using Machine Learning to Predict Heart Rate Variability in Heart Failure Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1