An Assessment of the Relationship between Profitability and Energy Intensity for Technology Oriented Manufacturing Firms in India

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.32479/ijeep.16344
Helan Alias Vaibhavi Kabirdas Alavani, Richa Shukla, Debasis Patnaik
{"title":"An Assessment of the Relationship between Profitability and Energy Intensity for Technology Oriented Manufacturing Firms in India","authors":"Helan Alias Vaibhavi Kabirdas Alavani, Richa Shukla, Debasis Patnaik","doi":"10.32479/ijeep.16344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nThe hypothesis put forth by Porter and Linde (1995) suggests imposing regulation to promote energy efficiency can lead to improved innovation and performance among firms. This study seeks to explore this theoretical premise in the Indian manufacturing sector by analysing the influence of energy intensity on profitability of firms belonging to the Perform Achieve and Trade (PAT) regulated sectors, with a particular focus on classifying technology oriented firms. The study examines seven manufacturing industries from the first cycle of the PAT policy. Two measures of energy intensity indicators, namely the physical economic indicator and the economic indicator, are included in the study. The empirical analysis is divided into two categories: Firms that import technology (714 firms) and firms that do not import technology (752 firms). The study employs panel data analysis with a fixed effect model to conduct the analysis for the time period 2011-2020. Based on empirical analysis, it appears that firms that import technology exhibit a negative relationship between energy intensity and firm performance. Non-technology importing firms exhibit a similar relationship but with a higher coefficient value for energy intensity. The study also includes control variables such as firm size, age, capital intensity, raw material imports, and market concentration. The results show that relatively small to medium-sized firms, which are also young and striving to expand their market size, achieve energy efficiency gains. This highlights the reluctance of established players to improve their performance efficiency through technological up gradation.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":38194,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.16344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hypothesis put forth by Porter and Linde (1995) suggests imposing regulation to promote energy efficiency can lead to improved innovation and performance among firms. This study seeks to explore this theoretical premise in the Indian manufacturing sector by analysing the influence of energy intensity on profitability of firms belonging to the Perform Achieve and Trade (PAT) regulated sectors, with a particular focus on classifying technology oriented firms. The study examines seven manufacturing industries from the first cycle of the PAT policy. Two measures of energy intensity indicators, namely the physical economic indicator and the economic indicator, are included in the study. The empirical analysis is divided into two categories: Firms that import technology (714 firms) and firms that do not import technology (752 firms). The study employs panel data analysis with a fixed effect model to conduct the analysis for the time period 2011-2020. Based on empirical analysis, it appears that firms that import technology exhibit a negative relationship between energy intensity and firm performance. Non-technology importing firms exhibit a similar relationship but with a higher coefficient value for energy intensity. The study also includes control variables such as firm size, age, capital intensity, raw material imports, and market concentration. The results show that relatively small to medium-sized firms, which are also young and striving to expand their market size, achieve energy efficiency gains. This highlights the reluctance of established players to improve their performance efficiency through technological up gradation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度技术导向型制造企业盈利能力与能源强度关系评估
波特和林德(Porter and Linde,1995 年)提出的假设表明,实施促进能源效率的法规可以提高企业的创新能力和绩效。本研究试图在印度制造业中探讨这一理论前提,分析能源密集度对属于 "绩效与贸易"(PAT)监管部门的企业盈利能力的影响,尤其侧重于技术导向型企业的分类。研究考察了 PAT 政策第一周期的七个制造业。研究包括两个能源强度指标,即物理经济指标和经济指标。实证分析分为两类:引进技术的企业(714 家)和不引进技术的企业(752 家)。研究采用面板数据分析和固定效应模型,对 2011-2020 年期间进行分析。根据实证分析,进口技术的企业在能源强度和企业绩效之间表现出负相关关系。非技术引进型企业表现出类似的关系,但能源强度的系数值更高。研究还包括企业规模、年龄、资本密集度、原材料进口和市场集中度等控制变量。研究结果表明,中小型企业,同时也是年轻企业,努力扩大市场规模,实现了能源效率的提高。这凸显了老牌企业不愿通过技术升级来提高能效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (IJEEP) is the international academic journal, and is a double-blind, peer-reviewed academic journal publishing high quality conceptual and measure development articles in the areas of energy economics, energy policy and related disciplines. The journal has a worldwide audience. The journal''s goal is to stimulate the development of energy economics, energy policy and related disciplines theory worldwide by publishing interesting articles in a highly readable format. The journal is published bimonthly (6 issues per year) and covers a wide variety of topics including (but not limited to): Energy Consumption, Electricity Consumption, Economic Growth - Energy, Energy Policy, Energy Planning, Energy Forecasting, Energy Pricing, Energy Politics, Energy Financing, Energy Efficiency, Energy Modelling, Energy Use, Energy - Environment, Energy Systems, Renewable Energy, Energy Sources, Environmental Economics, Oil & Gas .
期刊最新文献
Influence of Fossil Fuel Prices on Fossil and Renewable Electricity Consumptions, GDP, Inflation and Greenflation: A Case Study in the Asia Pacific Countries An Assessment of the Relationship between Profitability and Energy Intensity for Technology Oriented Manufacturing Firms in India Empirical Findings on the Relationship of Energy Consumption, Gross Domestic Product Per Capita and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Assessing the Relationship between CO2 Emissions, Renewable Energy, Trade Openness and Economic Growth: MENA Countries Analysis Leveraging Machine Learning to Assess the Impact of Energy Consumption on Global GDP Growth: What Actions should be taken Globally toward Environmental Concerns?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1