The design and hydraulic performance studies of a Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitter

Tianyu Xu, Changjiang Lin, Qiuyue Yu, Ennan Zheng
{"title":"The design and hydraulic performance studies of a Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitter","authors":"Tianyu Xu, Changjiang Lin, Qiuyue Yu, Ennan Zheng","doi":"10.1002/ird.2996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitter is a novel type of drip irrigation emitter that allows one‐way fluid flow and sharp water flow diversion. Orthogonal test schemes were employed to analyse the impact of structural parameters and energy dissipation mechanisms on hydraulic performance. The effect of vortex partitioning in forward and reverse flow channels on hydraulic performance was analysed. A prediction model for the emitter discharge exponent (flow index) of the structural parameters was established. The results indicated that the emitter discharge exponents of forward‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (FTEs) ranged from 0.47 to 0.506, and those of reverse‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (RTEs) ranged from 0.51 to 0.533. There was a significant disparity in the distribution of vortex zones between the FTE and RTE. The local loss coefficients of the FTE were 2.12–10.84, and those of the RTE were 1.00–3.71. The channel width D had a substantial impact on the emitter discharge exponents of the FTE and RTE, whereas the inlet length of diverter K, the length of the bevelled edge of raindrop‐type diverter B and the opening angle of raindrop‐type diverter θ had relatively smaller effects on the emitter discharge exponent. The determination coefficients of the regression model for the FTE and RTE were 0.89 and 0.84, respectively. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −4.57% to 1.21%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to −1.45% in the FTE. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −0.98% to 2.86%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to 1.45% in the RTE. These relative errors were all under 5%, indicating that the estimation of the emitter discharge exponent can be more accurate.","PeriodicalId":505999,"journal":{"name":"Irrigation and Drainage","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irrigation and Drainage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitter is a novel type of drip irrigation emitter that allows one‐way fluid flow and sharp water flow diversion. Orthogonal test schemes were employed to analyse the impact of structural parameters and energy dissipation mechanisms on hydraulic performance. The effect of vortex partitioning in forward and reverse flow channels on hydraulic performance was analysed. A prediction model for the emitter discharge exponent (flow index) of the structural parameters was established. The results indicated that the emitter discharge exponents of forward‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (FTEs) ranged from 0.47 to 0.506, and those of reverse‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (RTEs) ranged from 0.51 to 0.533. There was a significant disparity in the distribution of vortex zones between the FTE and RTE. The local loss coefficients of the FTE were 2.12–10.84, and those of the RTE were 1.00–3.71. The channel width D had a substantial impact on the emitter discharge exponents of the FTE and RTE, whereas the inlet length of diverter K, the length of the bevelled edge of raindrop‐type diverter B and the opening angle of raindrop‐type diverter θ had relatively smaller effects on the emitter discharge exponent. The determination coefficients of the regression model for the FTE and RTE were 0.89 and 0.84, respectively. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −4.57% to 1.21%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to −1.45% in the FTE. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −0.98% to 2.86%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to 1.45% in the RTE. These relative errors were all under 5%, indicating that the estimation of the emitter discharge exponent can be more accurate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特斯拉阀式滴灌喷头的设计与水力性能研究
特斯拉阀式滴灌喷头是一种新型滴灌喷头,可实现单向流体流动和水流急剧分流。采用正交试验方案分析了结构参数和消能机制对水力性能的影响。分析了正向和反向流道中涡流分区对水力性能的影响。建立了结构参数的喷射器排放指数(流量指数)预测模型。结果表明,正向特斯拉阀式滴灌喷头(FTE)的喷头排放指数在 0.47 至 0.506 之间,反向特斯拉阀式滴灌喷头(RTE)的喷头排放指数在 0.51 至 0.533 之间。FTE 和 RTE 的涡流区分布存在明显差异。FTE 的局部损失系数为 2.12-10.84,RTE 为 1.00-3.71。通道宽度 D 对 FTE 和 RTE 的喷射器排放指数有很大影响,而分流器入口长度 K、雨滴型分流器斜边长度 B 和雨滴型分流器开口角度 θ 对喷射器排放指数的影响相对较小。回归模型对 FTE 和 RTE 的判定系数分别为 0.89 和 0.84。在 FTE 中,模拟值与估计值的相对误差为 -4.57% 至 1.21%,实验值与估计值的相对误差为 -3.72% 至 -1.45% 。在 RTE 中,模拟值和估计值之间的相对误差为 -0.98% 至 2.86%,实验值和估计值之间的相对误差为 -3.72% 至 1.45%。这些相对误差都小于 5%,表明对发射器放电指数的估计可以更加准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Providing optimal cropping patterns and water consumption according to monitored and forecasted drought conditions Using degradable oxidizing additives in the manufacturing of drip irrigation tapes to prevent environmental problems Transforming an irrigation system to a smart irrigation system: A case study from Türkiye (Turkey) Morphophysiological indicators, phenophase and cutting time in an irrigated forage cactus–sorghum intercropping system under strategies of agricultural resilience and agriculture biosaline A review of lysimeters from the perspective of measurement performance and intelligent development in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1