MULTICULTURAL EMPLOYEES’ PERCEPTIONS OF DIVERSITY IN SOUTH AFRICA

Dirk Scheepers, Flip Schutte
{"title":"MULTICULTURAL EMPLOYEES’ PERCEPTIONS OF DIVERSITY IN SOUTH AFRICA","authors":"Dirk Scheepers, Flip Schutte","doi":"10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i7.4384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This research explored the in-depth meaning of how multicultural employees perceive diversity in South African formal sector firms. In doing so, it extracted the lived experiences of multicultural employees about the cultural differences perceived within the country. South Africa is characterised by cultural and linguistic heterogeneity and a relatively large formal sector economy by African standards.\n \nMethodology: For this cross-sectional study, data were gathered through a homogeneous purposive sampling of nine participants and conducting semi-structured interviews. This small sample size allows for a thorough investigation into each participant's lived experience to gather qualitative data. The specific phenomenological method used in this study is a novel interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which seeks to extract data and discern meaning in the participants' narratives.\n \nResults: The findings were interpreted through the lens of social identity theory within an interpretative philosophical paradigm. These interpretations were leveraged to extract a central narrative that is grouped thematically. The main finding was identifying several factors that contribute to the spanning of cultural boundaries in South African formal sector firms.\n \nPractical Implications: The study identified how participants make meaning of their experiences within the formal sector of South Africa and how their interpretations shape their behaviour and attitudes.\n \nOriginality/Value: The findings indicate that a significant amount of intra-country cultural diversity is perceived in the South African formal sector workplace, which can cause friction and reinforce cultural stereotypes.","PeriodicalId":31480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","volume":" 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i7.4384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This research explored the in-depth meaning of how multicultural employees perceive diversity in South African formal sector firms. In doing so, it extracted the lived experiences of multicultural employees about the cultural differences perceived within the country. South Africa is characterised by cultural and linguistic heterogeneity and a relatively large formal sector economy by African standards.   Methodology: For this cross-sectional study, data were gathered through a homogeneous purposive sampling of nine participants and conducting semi-structured interviews. This small sample size allows for a thorough investigation into each participant's lived experience to gather qualitative data. The specific phenomenological method used in this study is a novel interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which seeks to extract data and discern meaning in the participants' narratives.   Results: The findings were interpreted through the lens of social identity theory within an interpretative philosophical paradigm. These interpretations were leveraged to extract a central narrative that is grouped thematically. The main finding was identifying several factors that contribute to the spanning of cultural boundaries in South African formal sector firms.   Practical Implications: The study identified how participants make meaning of their experiences within the formal sector of South Africa and how their interpretations shape their behaviour and attitudes.   Originality/Value: The findings indicate that a significant amount of intra-country cultural diversity is perceived in the South African formal sector workplace, which can cause friction and reinforce cultural stereotypes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非多元文化员工对多样性的看法
目的:本研究深入探讨了多元文化员工如何看待南非正规企业中的多样性。在此过程中,研究人员提取了多元文化员工对国内文化差异的生活体验。南非的特点是文化和语言的异质性,而且按照非洲的标准,南非的正规经济规模相对较大。研究方法:在这项横断面研究中,通过对九名参与者进行同质有目的抽样,并进行半结构化访谈来收集数据。由于样本数量较少,因此可以深入调查每位参与者的生活经历,从而收集定性数据。本研究采用的特定现象学方法是一种新颖的解释性现象学分析(IPA),旨在从参与者的叙述中提取数据和辨析意义。研究结果在解释性哲学范式下,通过社会认同理论的视角对研究结果进行了解释。这些解释被用来提取按主题分组的中心叙述。主要发现是确定了导致南非正规部门企业跨越文化界限的几个因素。实际意义:本研究确定了参与者如何理解他们在南非正规部门的经历,以及他们的解释如何影响他们的行为和态度。原创性/价值:研究结果表明,南非正规经济部门的工作场所存在大量的国内文化多样性,这可能会引起摩擦并强化文化成见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Professional Business Review
International Journal of Professional Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
RESOURCE CAPACITY PLANNING AND CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE IN LAIKIPIA COUNTY, KENYA RESOURCE PROCUREMENT AND CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE IN LAIKIPIA COUNTY, KENYA RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP AND CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE IN LAIKIPIA COUNTY, KENYA RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE IN LAIKIPIA COUNTY, KENYA THE ROLE OF THE UNIVERSITY BUSINESS INCUBATORS IN ACCOMPANYING AND SUPPORTING THE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS IN THE LIGHT OF DECREE 1275 – A PILOT STUDY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF GHARDAIA UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1