Reflexiones sobre la reforma del recurso de casación civil

Rafael Hinojosa Segovia
{"title":"Reflexiones sobre la reforma del recurso de casación civil","authors":"Rafael Hinojosa Segovia","doi":"10.5209/foro.95147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By this piece of work, the author carries out a study on the reform of the civil cassation appeal carried out, mainly, by Royal Decree- Law 5/2023, dated 28 June, by which with the new regulation, which came into force on July 29, 2023, it is intended to unload matters from the First Chamber of the Supreme Court, given the saturation situation it is experiencing, so that the response to the resources raised is within a reasonable period of time. Thus, the new configuration of the aforementioned appeal is analyzed, eliminating the split into an extraordinary appeal for procedural infringement and appeal for cassation, established by the Law 2000 on Civil Procedure and now opting only for a single extraordinary appeal, that of cassation, to through which both violations of procedural law and material law must be articulated. Likewise, it stops at the analysis of the cassation interest as a preferential and almost exclusive means of the aforementioned appeal, examining the procedure, with special emphasis on the admission phase. Likewise, it refers to Royal Decree-Law 6/2023, of December 19, by which certain modifications are carried out and some omissions are corrected in the regulation of the aforementioned resource, whose entry into force is March 20, 2024. Furthermore, the new regulations continue to favor the primacy of the ius constitutionis, in terms of the defense of the law and jurisprudential unification, to the detriment of the ius litigatoris, which should not be forgotten, because ultimately Justice is at the service of the citizen to resolve its claims.","PeriodicalId":513269,"journal":{"name":"FORO. Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Nueva Época","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORO. Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Nueva Época","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/foro.95147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By this piece of work, the author carries out a study on the reform of the civil cassation appeal carried out, mainly, by Royal Decree- Law 5/2023, dated 28 June, by which with the new regulation, which came into force on July 29, 2023, it is intended to unload matters from the First Chamber of the Supreme Court, given the saturation situation it is experiencing, so that the response to the resources raised is within a reasonable period of time. Thus, the new configuration of the aforementioned appeal is analyzed, eliminating the split into an extraordinary appeal for procedural infringement and appeal for cassation, established by the Law 2000 on Civil Procedure and now opting only for a single extraordinary appeal, that of cassation, to through which both violations of procedural law and material law must be articulated. Likewise, it stops at the analysis of the cassation interest as a preferential and almost exclusive means of the aforementioned appeal, examining the procedure, with special emphasis on the admission phase. Likewise, it refers to Royal Decree-Law 6/2023, of December 19, by which certain modifications are carried out and some omissions are corrected in the regulation of the aforementioned resource, whose entry into force is March 20, 2024. Furthermore, the new regulations continue to favor the primacy of the ius constitutionis, in terms of the defense of the law and jurisprudential unification, to the detriment of the ius litigatoris, which should not be forgotten, because ultimately Justice is at the service of the citizen to resolve its claims.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对民事撤销原判上诉改革的思考
通过本作品,作者对民事撤销原判上诉的改革进行了研究,改革主要是根据 6 月 28 日第 5/2023 号皇家法令进行的,根据 2023 年 7 月 29 日生效的新规定,考虑到最高法院第一审判庭正处于饱和状态,新规定旨在卸载第一审判庭的事务,以便在合理的时间内对所提出的资源做出回应。因此,对上述上诉的新结构进行了分析,取消了 2000 年《民事诉讼法》规定的程序违法特别上诉和撤销原判上诉,现在只选择单一的撤销原判特别上诉,通过该上诉必须说明违反程序法和实体法的情况。同样,本报告在分析作为上述上诉的优先和几乎唯一手段的撤销原判利益时,对程序进行了审查,并特别强调了受理阶段。同样,它还提到了 12 月 19 日颁布的第 6/2023 号敕令,该敕令对上述资源的规定进行了某些修改,并纠正了一些遗漏,该规定于 2024 年 3 月 20 日生效。此外,新条例在捍卫法律和统一法理方面继续倾向于宪法优先,而不应该忘记诉讼优先,因为司法最终是为公民解决其诉求服务的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
María del Carmen Chéliz Inglés, Sustracción internacional de menores y la mediación. Retos y vías prácticas de solución, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, 2019, 406 pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/foro.95156. Miguel Artola, De la Ilustración al Liberalismo. Jovellanos y Argüelles. Estudio preliminar de Ignacio Fernández Sarasola, colección Historiadores, núm. 38, Pamplona, Urgoiti Editores, 2023, LXXII + 204 pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/foro.95157. Sobre el concepto y los derechos de la persona "afectada" por comunicaciones sobre infracciones en la Ley 2/2023, reguladora de la protección de la persona informante Reflexiones sobre la reforma del recurso de casación civil Paloma Durán y Lalaguna, El mundo que quisiéramos (Reflexiones desde la Universidad), Córdoba, Almuzara, 2023, 154 pp. https://dx.doi. org/10.5209/foro.95154.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1