Glasgow Coma Scale Scores and Impact of Delirium on Intubated Seizure Patients Treated with Phenytoin and Lacosamide: Retrospective Analysis and Literature Review

Sara Alattar, Muhammad Nouman, Chidozie Onyiuke, Conrad Stasieluk, Edwin S Meresh
{"title":"Glasgow Coma Scale Scores and Impact of Delirium on Intubated Seizure Patients Treated with Phenytoin and Lacosamide: Retrospective Analysis and Literature Review","authors":"Sara Alattar, Muhammad Nouman, Chidozie Onyiuke, Conrad Stasieluk, Edwin S Meresh","doi":"10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2403230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have shown that decrease in time intubated is associated with better prognosis. Delirium is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay. However, there is limited report on delirium in intubated seizure patients. As per report, low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) increased the risk of delirium and thus increasing ICU length of stay. Information on delirium and outcome in intubated seizure patients receiving lacosamide versus phenytoin is limited. Our retrospective pilot study aimed to assess the GCS scores and impact of delirium in intubated seizure patients who were treated with phenytoin and lacosamide. In this retrospective pilot study, review was conducted via chart review of hospitalized, intubated seizure patients on Phenytoin or Lacosamide at Loyola University Medical Center Neurology ICU from 2018 to 2020. Endotracheal intubation was identified by ICD 10, ICD-10-PCS 0BH17EZ, (Z99.11), and Delirium diagnosis was identified using delirium ICD codes 10 F05, R41. 82 R41.0, ICD 9: 293, 780.97, and 298.2. Hospital and ICU patient admit and discharge dates and Glasgow Coma Scale scores were extracted. This pilot study investigated qualitative variables. The patient age at admission was an average of 65 years. A total of 20 charts were included in the final analysis. 50% of phenytoin group experienced delirium (4/8), 50% of the lacosamide group also experienced delirium (6/12). Number of Days Intubated in Delirium: 2.0 days, no delirium: 1.5 days, number of Days in ICU in Delirium: 5.6 days, no delirium: 3.3 days, number of days in hospital in delirium: 13.7 days, no delirium: 8.5 day. Patients with delirium had longer ICU stays (5.6 days vs. 3.3) and hospital stays (13.7 days vs. 8.5). Patients with GCS less than 10 were much more likely to experience delirium, with 8 out of 11 (73%) patients experiencing delirium versus 2 out of 9 (22%) for patients with GCS greater than 10. Low GCS score at ICU admission could predict emerging delirium in intubated seizure patients. Studies are required to see if early treatment of delirium can decrease the ICU length of stay. Our pilot study highlighted that GCS scores are a key component of assessment of functioning over hospital admission. Prospective and larger studies are required to determine the impact of delirium and relationship between GCS scores and delirium in intubated seizure patients. KeywordsStatus epilepticus; intubation; seizure; delirium; anticonvulsants; Glasgow Coma Scale score","PeriodicalId":507111,"journal":{"name":"OBM Neurobiology","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2403230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that decrease in time intubated is associated with better prognosis. Delirium is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay. However, there is limited report on delirium in intubated seizure patients. As per report, low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) increased the risk of delirium and thus increasing ICU length of stay. Information on delirium and outcome in intubated seizure patients receiving lacosamide versus phenytoin is limited. Our retrospective pilot study aimed to assess the GCS scores and impact of delirium in intubated seizure patients who were treated with phenytoin and lacosamide. In this retrospective pilot study, review was conducted via chart review of hospitalized, intubated seizure patients on Phenytoin or Lacosamide at Loyola University Medical Center Neurology ICU from 2018 to 2020. Endotracheal intubation was identified by ICD 10, ICD-10-PCS 0BH17EZ, (Z99.11), and Delirium diagnosis was identified using delirium ICD codes 10 F05, R41. 82 R41.0, ICD 9: 293, 780.97, and 298.2. Hospital and ICU patient admit and discharge dates and Glasgow Coma Scale scores were extracted. This pilot study investigated qualitative variables. The patient age at admission was an average of 65 years. A total of 20 charts were included in the final analysis. 50% of phenytoin group experienced delirium (4/8), 50% of the lacosamide group also experienced delirium (6/12). Number of Days Intubated in Delirium: 2.0 days, no delirium: 1.5 days, number of Days in ICU in Delirium: 5.6 days, no delirium: 3.3 days, number of days in hospital in delirium: 13.7 days, no delirium: 8.5 day. Patients with delirium had longer ICU stays (5.6 days vs. 3.3) and hospital stays (13.7 days vs. 8.5). Patients with GCS less than 10 were much more likely to experience delirium, with 8 out of 11 (73%) patients experiencing delirium versus 2 out of 9 (22%) for patients with GCS greater than 10. Low GCS score at ICU admission could predict emerging delirium in intubated seizure patients. Studies are required to see if early treatment of delirium can decrease the ICU length of stay. Our pilot study highlighted that GCS scores are a key component of assessment of functioning over hospital admission. Prospective and larger studies are required to determine the impact of delirium and relationship between GCS scores and delirium in intubated seizure patients. KeywordsStatus epilepticus; intubation; seizure; delirium; anticonvulsants; Glasgow Coma Scale score
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用苯妥英和拉科酰胺治疗的插管癫痫患者的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分和谵妄的影响:回顾性分析和文献综述
研究表明,缩短插管时间与改善预后有关。谵妄与机械通气时间和重症监护室(ICU)住院时间的延长有关。然而,有关插管癫痫发作患者谵妄的报道却很有限。根据报告,低格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)会增加谵妄的风险,从而延长重症监护室的住院时间。有关接受拉科酰胺与苯妥英治疗的插管癫痫患者的谵妄和预后的信息十分有限。我们的回顾性试点研究旨在评估接受苯妥英和拉科酰胺治疗的插管癫痫患者的GCS评分和谵妄的影响。在这项回顾性试点研究中,我们通过病历回顾对 2018 年至 2020 年期间在洛约拉大学医学中心神经病学 ICU 接受苯妥英或拉科酰胺治疗的住院插管癫痫发作患者进行了审查。气管插管由 ICD 10、ICD-10-PCS 0BH17EZ、(Z99.11)确定,谵妄诊断由谵妄 ICD 代码 10 F05、R41.82 R41.0,ICD 9:293、780.97 和 298.2。提取了医院和重症监护室患者的入院和出院日期以及格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分。这项试点研究调查的是定性变量。患者入院时的平均年龄为 65 岁。共有 20 份病历被纳入最终分析。50%的苯妥英组患者出现谵妄(4/8),50%的拉科酰胺组患者也出现谵妄(6/12)。谵妄时插管天数:2.0 天,无谵妄时:1.5 天;谵妄时在重症监护室的天数:5.6 天,无谵妄时:3.3 天;谵妄时住院天数:13.7 天,无谵妄时:8.5 天。谵妄患者在重症监护室(5.6 天对 3.3 天)和住院(13.7 天对 8.5 天)的时间更长。GCS 小于 10 分的患者更容易出现谵妄,11 名患者中有 8 名(73%)出现谵妄,而 GCS 大于 10 分的患者 9 名中只有 2 名(22%)出现谵妄。ICU 入院时 GCS 评分较低可预测插管的癫痫发作患者会出现谵妄。早期治疗谵妄是否能缩短重症监护室的住院时间还需要研究。我们的试点研究强调,GCS 评分是入院时功能评估的关键组成部分。需要进行前瞻性和更大规模的研究,以确定谵妄的影响以及插管癫痫发作患者的GCS评分与谵妄之间的关系。关键词癫痫状态;插管;癫痫发作;谵妄;抗惊厥药;格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Biomolecular Basis of Gut Microbiome on Neurological Diseases Implementation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in a Child with Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder: A Case Study Glasgow Coma Scale Scores and Impact of Delirium on Intubated Seizure Patients Treated with Phenytoin and Lacosamide: Retrospective Analysis and Literature Review Alpha/Theta Neurofeedback Rehabilitation for Improving Attention and Working Memory in Female Students with Learning Disabilities Oleuropein can Protect the Brain Against Deleterious Effects of Bile Duct Ligation in Male Mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1