Subjective Effects of Using a Passive Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Industrial Textile Workers

Safety Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.3390/safety10030059
E. Capodaglio, Federica Amitrano, A. Coccia, Vittorio Gabba, G. Pagano, Giovanni D’Addio, M. Panigazzi
{"title":"Subjective Effects of Using a Passive Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Industrial Textile Workers","authors":"E. Capodaglio, Federica Amitrano, A. Coccia, Vittorio Gabba, G. Pagano, Giovanni D’Addio, M. Panigazzi","doi":"10.3390/safety10030059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Industrial wool textile production exposes workers mainly to the biomechanical loading of the shoulder joint. In this work context, which is characterized by poor machine ergonomics, exposure to biomechanical risk factors, and variable work organization, exoskeletons could facilitate work processes or could be a valuable means to protect workers from overuse injuries. Field evaluation is essential to verify the suitability of specific devices and their acceptance by users. As part of a pilot study, we examined the short-term subjective effects of a passive Arm-Support Exoskeleton (ASE) on workers performing repetitive overhead tasks. In a textile factory, eight workers participated in the study, answering questionnaires after carrying out a work session with (ASE) and without an exoskeleton (FREE). Participants had been using the Paexo exoskeleton for 4.2±5.8 months (min 0–max 12). Subjective evaluations were collected regarding the workload (NASA-TLX) and relief (Borg’s CR10 scale) obtained from the use of the exoskeleton, satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)), usability (System Usability Scale (SUS)), and opinions on the ergonomics of the device (Ergonomics questionnaire). Workers reported a high workload (NASA 7.2±1.0) and assessed a 46% reduction in effort on the CR10 in ASE conditions compared to FREE. They expressed high satisfaction with most characteristics of the ASE (100% satisfied with durability and effectiveness), high level of usability (62% of scores above 80, out of a maximum score of 100), and ergonomics of the device (88±12, out of a maximum score of 110). In addition to the objective effects (electromyography (EMG) reduction) already demonstrated in a previous publication, these qualitative results demonstrate a positive perception by textile workers regarding the effectiveness, usability, and suitability of the exoskeleton. The adoption of ASE in the textile industry appears beneficial in the short term, but the impact associated with individual variables and long-term effects remains to be explored.","PeriodicalId":509460,"journal":{"name":"Safety","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10030059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industrial wool textile production exposes workers mainly to the biomechanical loading of the shoulder joint. In this work context, which is characterized by poor machine ergonomics, exposure to biomechanical risk factors, and variable work organization, exoskeletons could facilitate work processes or could be a valuable means to protect workers from overuse injuries. Field evaluation is essential to verify the suitability of specific devices and their acceptance by users. As part of a pilot study, we examined the short-term subjective effects of a passive Arm-Support Exoskeleton (ASE) on workers performing repetitive overhead tasks. In a textile factory, eight workers participated in the study, answering questionnaires after carrying out a work session with (ASE) and without an exoskeleton (FREE). Participants had been using the Paexo exoskeleton for 4.2±5.8 months (min 0–max 12). Subjective evaluations were collected regarding the workload (NASA-TLX) and relief (Borg’s CR10 scale) obtained from the use of the exoskeleton, satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)), usability (System Usability Scale (SUS)), and opinions on the ergonomics of the device (Ergonomics questionnaire). Workers reported a high workload (NASA 7.2±1.0) and assessed a 46% reduction in effort on the CR10 in ASE conditions compared to FREE. They expressed high satisfaction with most characteristics of the ASE (100% satisfied with durability and effectiveness), high level of usability (62% of scores above 80, out of a maximum score of 100), and ergonomics of the device (88±12, out of a maximum score of 110). In addition to the objective effects (electromyography (EMG) reduction) already demonstrated in a previous publication, these qualitative results demonstrate a positive perception by textile workers regarding the effectiveness, usability, and suitability of the exoskeleton. The adoption of ASE in the textile industry appears beneficial in the short term, but the impact associated with individual variables and long-term effects remains to be explored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业纺织工人使用被动式上肢外骨骼的主观效果
工业羊毛纺织品生产中,工人主要承受肩关节的生物力学负荷。这种工作环境的特点是机器人体工程学性能差、暴露于生物力学风险因素和多变的工作组织,在这种情况下,外骨骼可以促进工作流程,也可以成为保护工人免受过度劳损的重要手段。实地评估对于验证特定设备的适用性和用户的接受程度至关重要。作为试点研究的一部分,我们研究了被动式手臂支撑外骨骼(ASE)对从事重复性高空作业的工人的短期主观影响。在一家纺织厂,八名工人参加了这项研究,他们在使用(ASE)和不使用(FREE)外骨骼进行工作后回答了调查问卷。参与者使用 Paexo 外骨骼的时间为 4.2±5.8 个月(最小 0 个月,最大 12 个月)。收集的主观评价包括使用外骨骼后的工作量(NASA-TLX)和缓解程度(博格CR10量表)、满意度(魁北克用户对辅助技术满意度评估(QUEST))、可用性(系统可用性量表(SUS))以及对设备人体工学的看法(人体工学问卷)。工人们表示他们的工作量很大(NASA 7.2±1.0),与免费相比,在 ASE 条件下使用 CR10 的工作量减少了 46%。他们对 ASE 的大多数特性(对耐用性和有效性 100%满意)、高水平的可用性(62% 的评分超过 80 分,最高分为 100 分)和设备的人体工程学(88±12 分,最高分为 110 分)表示高度满意。除了之前发表的客观效果(肌电图(EMG)减少)之外,这些定性结果还表明纺织工人对外骨骼的有效性、可用性和适用性有积极的看法。纺织业采用 ASE 似乎在短期内是有益的,但与个体变量和长期效果相关的影响仍有待探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Shoulder Risk Factors in the Repetitive Task of Slaughterhouse Operational Management and Improvement Strategies of Evacuation Centers during the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake—A Case Study of Wajima City An Analysis of Occupational Hazards Based on the Physical Ergonomics Dimension to Improve the Occupational Health of Agricultural Workers: The Case in Mayo Valley, Mexico Review of Integrated Management Systems to Re-Engineer Existing Nonconformances Troubleshooting System Subjective Effects of Using a Passive Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Industrial Textile Workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1