New frontiers for Biosocial Birth Cohort Research: interdisciplinary approaches to exposure, harmonisation and collaboration

S. Gibbon, Elizabeth, F. S. Roberts, Rebecca Hardy, D. Behague, Martha, M. Téllez Rojo, Ana Goncalves-Soares, Rosie Mathers, Michael Penkler, Silvia Fraga, Andrew Wooyoung Kim, Michelle Pentecost, Evie Tabor, Robbin Jeffries-Hein, Martine Lappé, Catherine Borra, Sophia Rossmann, Stephanie Lloyd, A. Filipe, Susana Silva
{"title":"New frontiers for Biosocial Birth Cohort Research: interdisciplinary approaches to exposure, harmonisation and collaboration","authors":"S. Gibbon, Elizabeth, F. S. Roberts, Rebecca Hardy, D. Behague, Martha, M. Téllez Rojo, Ana Goncalves-Soares, Rosie Mathers, Michael Penkler, Silvia Fraga, Andrew Wooyoung Kim, Michelle Pentecost, Evie Tabor, Robbin Jeffries-Hein, Martine Lappé, Catherine Borra, Sophia Rossmann, Stephanie Lloyd, A. Filipe, Susana Silva","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21734.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Open Letter we bring together researchers from the Biosocial Birth Cohort Research (BBCR) network to reflect on interdisciplinary research and methods within birth cohorts and to draw attention to social science approaches to this field, which we argue are underutilized. A more comprehensive and consistent integration of social science approaches would expand the scope and value of research with birth cohorts. We critically engage three specific areas of birth cohort research that provide significant opportunities for exchange across disciplines; how exposure is defined and measured in birth cohorts, the harmonisation of data within and between birth cohorts and the broader experience of interdisciplinary collaboration in birth cohorts and birth cohort research. By reflecting on these three areas, we highlight the need for more in-depth dialogue between life and social sciences in the design of birth cohorts, the measures that are used, and the research made possible. We argue that improving the methodological tools for measuring social and biological exposures, incorporating the complexity of participant experience, and ensuring that longitudinal studies are recognised by a wider range of disciplines are essential for collaborative biosocial research with the goal of mitigating health disparities in global and public health.","PeriodicalId":508490,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21734.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this Open Letter we bring together researchers from the Biosocial Birth Cohort Research (BBCR) network to reflect on interdisciplinary research and methods within birth cohorts and to draw attention to social science approaches to this field, which we argue are underutilized. A more comprehensive and consistent integration of social science approaches would expand the scope and value of research with birth cohorts. We critically engage three specific areas of birth cohort research that provide significant opportunities for exchange across disciplines; how exposure is defined and measured in birth cohorts, the harmonisation of data within and between birth cohorts and the broader experience of interdisciplinary collaboration in birth cohorts and birth cohort research. By reflecting on these three areas, we highlight the need for more in-depth dialogue between life and social sciences in the design of birth cohorts, the measures that are used, and the research made possible. We argue that improving the methodological tools for measuring social and biological exposures, incorporating the complexity of participant experience, and ensuring that longitudinal studies are recognised by a wider range of disciplines are essential for collaborative biosocial research with the goal of mitigating health disparities in global and public health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物社会出生队列研究的新领域:接触、协调与合作的跨学科方法
在这封公开信中,我们汇集了来自生物社会出生队列研究(BBCR)网络的研究人员,对出生队列中的跨学科研究和方法进行反思,并提请人们关注这一领域的社会科学方法,我们认为这些方法还没有得到充分利用。更全面、更一致地整合社会科学方法将扩大出生队列研究的范围和价值。我们对出生队列研究的三个具体领域进行了批判性探讨,这三个领域为跨学科交流提供了重要机会:如何定义和测量出生队列中的暴露、出生队列内部和出生队列之间数据的协调以及出生队列和出生队列研究中更广泛的跨学科合作经验。通过对这三个领域的反思,我们强调生命科学和社会科学需要在出生队列的设计、使用的测量方法和研究方面进行更深入的对话。我们认为,改进测量社会和生物暴露的方法工具,将参与者经历的复杂性纳入其中,并确保纵向研究得到更广泛学科的认可,这些对于以缩小全球和公共卫生中的健康差距为目标的生物社会合作研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The genome sequence of the bloodfluke planorb, Biomphalaria glabrata (Say, 1818) The genome sequence of the blonde ray, Raja brachyura Lafont, 1871 The genome sequence of the Northern Bottlenose Whale, Hyperoodon ampullatus (Forster, 1770) The genome sequence of the Maiden’s Blush moth, Cyclophora punctaria (Linnaeus, 1758) The genome sequence of a jewel beetle, Agrilus biguttatus (Fabricius, 1776)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1