Health and social care leaders’ and employees’ perceptions of remote leadership and the associated factors

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Leadership in Health Services Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1108/lhs-01-2024-0010
Anja Terkamo-Moisio, Elsa Paronen, A. Häggman-Laitila, Johanna Lammintakanen
{"title":"Health and social care leaders’ and employees’ perceptions of remote leadership and the associated factors","authors":"Anja Terkamo-Moisio, Elsa Paronen, A. Häggman-Laitila, Johanna Lammintakanen","doi":"10.1108/lhs-01-2024-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThe purpose of this study was to describe health and social care leaders’ and employees’ perceptions of remote leadership and the associated factors.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA total of 45 leaders and 177 employees from one Finnish health and social care organization completed an electronic questionnaire between October and November 2020. The questionnaire included questions related to background information, along with structured and open-ended questions addressing remote leadership and the associated factors. The collected quantitative data was analyzed with statistical methods, while inductive content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data.\n\nFindings\nRemote leadership emerged as a developing form of leadership that was part of everyday life at a regional health and social care organization. However, it was also considered by some as a distanced and authoritarian form of leadership that reduced communication to a one-way flow of information. Remote leadership and digitalization in health and social care were generally perceived positively, especially among higher educated participants and those working mainly in a remote context. However, digitalization was also perceived as a burden and remote leadership as a source of uncertainty at work, especially among lower educated participants and those who worked mainly in traditional contexts.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study expands the little-researched area and provides insights that can be used to further develop remote leadership and the related education.\n","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lhs-01-2024-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe health and social care leaders’ and employees’ perceptions of remote leadership and the associated factors. Design/methodology/approach A total of 45 leaders and 177 employees from one Finnish health and social care organization completed an electronic questionnaire between October and November 2020. The questionnaire included questions related to background information, along with structured and open-ended questions addressing remote leadership and the associated factors. The collected quantitative data was analyzed with statistical methods, while inductive content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Findings Remote leadership emerged as a developing form of leadership that was part of everyday life at a regional health and social care organization. However, it was also considered by some as a distanced and authoritarian form of leadership that reduced communication to a one-way flow of information. Remote leadership and digitalization in health and social care were generally perceived positively, especially among higher educated participants and those working mainly in a remote context. However, digitalization was also perceived as a burden and remote leadership as a source of uncertainty at work, especially among lower educated participants and those who worked mainly in traditional contexts. Originality/value This study expands the little-researched area and provides insights that can be used to further develop remote leadership and the related education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗与社会护理领导和员工对远程领导的看法及相关因素
本研究的目的是描述医疗和社会医疗机构的领导者和员工对远程领导力及相关因素的看法。问卷包括与背景信息相关的问题,以及针对远程领导力和相关因素的结构化和开放式问题。对收集到的定量数据采用了统计方法进行分析,而对定性数据则采用了归纳内容分析法。研究结果远程领导作为一种发展中的领导形式出现在一家地区性医疗和社会护理机构的日常生活中。然而,也有一些人认为远程领导是一种疏远和专制的领导形式,它将沟通简化为单向的信息流动。人们普遍对医疗和社会保健领域的远程领导和数字化持积极态度,尤其是受过高等教育和主要在远程环境下工作的参与者。然而,数字化也被视为一种负担,远程领导则是工作中不确定性的来源,尤其是在受教育程度较低和主要在传统环境中工作的参与者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Contexts and complexities: a realist evaluation of integrated care system leadership. Ethical leadership in health-care organizations - a scoping review. Leadership in federally qualified health centers: examining recruitment and retention in rural Oklahoma. A case study of a pilot leadership skills program to clarify professional fulfillment sources for academic physicians. Exploring the relationship between patient safety culture and the full-range leadership theory in primary care settings: a conceptual analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1