How to Disclose Internal Carotid Artery Dehiscence in Patients With Eustachian Tube Dysfunction: Cone Beam Computed Tomography or High-resolution Computed Tomography?

Abstract

To compare the prevalence of internal carotid artery dehiscence (ICAD) on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). A prospective, cohort study. The outpatient clinic at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery at Gødstrup Hospital, Denmark (tertiary referral center). Patients >18 years of age diagnosed with long-standing ETD undergoing HRCT and/or CBCT prior to balloon Eustachian tuboplasty. Patients had either initially HRCT and later CBCT performed (HRCT + CBCT group) or solely CBCT (CBCT group). Prevalence of ICAD assessed with HRCT and CBCT. A total of 23 patients were included in the HRCT + CBCT group and 36 patients in the CBCT group. In the HRCT + CBCT group, ICAD was found in 13 temporal bones (28.3%) with HRCT and 7 temporal bones (15.2%) with CBCT (P = 0.0003). No new cases of ICAD were found with CBCT. In the CBCT group, ICAD was found in 6 temporal bones (8.3%). In both HRCT and CBCT, patients suffered from ETD in 61.5% of the ears where ICAD was found. CBCT has a higher specificity than HRCT in diagnosing ICAD in patients with ETD while at the same time using less radiation.