Amelioration of a liturgical ethos mindful of anamnesis and its convergence with environmental justice

F. Kruger
{"title":"Amelioration of a liturgical ethos mindful of anamnesis and its convergence with environmental justice","authors":"F. Kruger","doi":"10.17570/stj.2024.v10n2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the problematic praxis of life in the Anthropocene amidst the urgent calls for environmental justice. Normally, people are confused and misled by this concept due to a political ringtone. However, the article argues that justice or righteousness should always be integral to a faith community’s outlook on life. Among numerous other ministry manifestations, liturgical praxeology offers unique opportunities to establish a deep-rooted liturgical ethos. Contemplation about the harmful effects of injustices on a meaningful life provides the opportunity to reconsider how liturgy can enhance or ameliorate a liturgical ethos grounded in moral principles. The concept of ethos touches on the persuasive or performative essence of liturgical enactment. If this is the case, surely a hunger for destruction, wars, and devastating acts that limit opportunities for a liveable life in the environment should be considered essential. The liturgical ethos must remind people to remember the precious memories of what should be done regarding righteousness (justice) and wardship. In laying the foundation for a deep-rooted ethos, responsibility takes centre stage. Faith communities, by emphasizing this sense of responsibility, can contribute towards a renewed hunger for justice and righteousness in their environments. The research question guiding this exploration is articulated as follows: How can liturgical ethos, with explicit reference to anamnesis and its convergence with the gravity of environmental justice, contribute to fostering responsibility for the environment among participants of the liturgy? This question is addressed through a qualitative literature study. Browning (1996:34), for example, is interested in practical wisdom’s (phronesis) purpose of understanding human action and defines a research activity as a process that starts with a description and then moves to the endeavour of systemization. Eventually, strategizing perspectives will offer liturgical perspectives on a liturgical ethos or praxeology that could promote moral responsibility among the liturgy participants.","PeriodicalId":508967,"journal":{"name":"Stellenbosch Theological Journal","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stellenbosch Theological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2024.v10n2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article deals with the problematic praxis of life in the Anthropocene amidst the urgent calls for environmental justice. Normally, people are confused and misled by this concept due to a political ringtone. However, the article argues that justice or righteousness should always be integral to a faith community’s outlook on life. Among numerous other ministry manifestations, liturgical praxeology offers unique opportunities to establish a deep-rooted liturgical ethos. Contemplation about the harmful effects of injustices on a meaningful life provides the opportunity to reconsider how liturgy can enhance or ameliorate a liturgical ethos grounded in moral principles. The concept of ethos touches on the persuasive or performative essence of liturgical enactment. If this is the case, surely a hunger for destruction, wars, and devastating acts that limit opportunities for a liveable life in the environment should be considered essential. The liturgical ethos must remind people to remember the precious memories of what should be done regarding righteousness (justice) and wardship. In laying the foundation for a deep-rooted ethos, responsibility takes centre stage. Faith communities, by emphasizing this sense of responsibility, can contribute towards a renewed hunger for justice and righteousness in their environments. The research question guiding this exploration is articulated as follows: How can liturgical ethos, with explicit reference to anamnesis and its convergence with the gravity of environmental justice, contribute to fostering responsibility for the environment among participants of the liturgy? This question is addressed through a qualitative literature study. Browning (1996:34), for example, is interested in practical wisdom’s (phronesis) purpose of understanding human action and defines a research activity as a process that starts with a description and then moves to the endeavour of systemization. Eventually, strategizing perspectives will offer liturgical perspectives on a liturgical ethos or praxeology that could promote moral responsibility among the liturgy participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善铭记悼念的礼仪风尚及其与环境正义的融合
本文探讨了在环境正义的迫切呼声中,"人类世 "生活的实践问题。通常,人们会被这一概念的政治色彩所迷惑和误导。然而,文章认为,正义或公义应始终是信仰团体人生观的组成部分。在众多其他事工表现形式中,礼仪实践学为建立根深蒂固的礼仪精神提供了独特的机会。思考不公正对有意义生活的有害影响,为重新考虑礼仪如何加强或改善以道德原则为基础的礼仪精神提供了机会。伦理的概念触及了礼仪的说服力或表演性本质。如果是这样的话,那么对破坏、战争和限制环境中宜居生活机会的破坏性行为的渴求肯定是必不可少的。礼仪风尚必须提醒人们牢记关于正义(公正)和守护的珍贵记忆。在为根深蒂固的精神奠定基础的过程中,责任感占据了中心位置。信仰团体通过强调这种责任感,可以促进人们重新渴求其所处环境中的正义和公理。指导这一探索的研究问题阐述如下:在明确提及 "悼念 "及其与环境正义的重心相融合的情况下,礼仪精神如何才能促进礼 仪参与者对环境的责任感?我们将通过定性文献研究来探讨这一问题。例如,布朗宁(1996:34)对实践智慧(phronesis)理解人类行动的目的很感兴趣,并将研究活动定义为一个从描述开始到系统化努力的过程。最终,战略视角将为礼仪伦理或实践学提供礼仪视角,从而促进礼仪参与者的道德责任感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
theological appraisal of the satisfaction theory of atonement Immigrants and narrative practical theology case study of transforming lives of the poor in the Amalinda Forest Community, East London From gadgets towards community Karl Marx and the Catholic Church’s praxis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1