The comparison of the Bayesian method with the classical methods in modeling crown width for Prince Rupprecht larch in northern China

Liang Hong, Mengxi Wang, Linyan Feng, Guangshuang Duan, Liyong Fu, Xiyue Wang
{"title":"The comparison of the Bayesian method with the classical methods in modeling crown width for Prince Rupprecht larch in northern China","authors":"Liang Hong, Mengxi Wang, Linyan Feng, Guangshuang Duan, Liyong Fu, Xiyue Wang","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2024.1405639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crown width (CW) is a significant variable of tree growth, but measuring crown width is laborious and time-consuming. Diameter at breast height (D) is a commonly used growth variable in crown width prediction. Here, a CW-D model was developed to estimate the crown width of larch.The data of 1,515 larch trees were collected in Guandi mountain, the northern China. We chose linear function, quadratic function, and other form of base functions to develop the CW models, and we introduced non-linear least squares techniques (NLS), non-linear mixed-effect (NLME), and Bayesian method in modeling process. Because the data was from different plot, we added a plot level random effect in NLME method to predict the effect from environment. For equally comparing the Bayesian method with the NLME, we also added the plot level random effect to the Bayesian MCMC procedure. We selected Akaike's information criterion and logarithm likelihood to evaluate NLS and NLME models, and chose deviance information criterion and stationary test to test Bayesian method. These methods had another three same indicators (the determination coefficient, root mean square error, and mean absolute deviation) in model evaluation.Heteroskedasticity wasn't occurred in this study. The model I.2 (quadratic formula) showed a best fitting effect in each method, and Bayesian method with random effect was slightly superior than other methods. Therefore, the selected final model was quadratic function by Bayesian method with plot level random effect, this combination had the highest prediction accuracy in the larch trees' crown width estimation of Guandi mountain.","PeriodicalId":507254,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1405639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crown width (CW) is a significant variable of tree growth, but measuring crown width is laborious and time-consuming. Diameter at breast height (D) is a commonly used growth variable in crown width prediction. Here, a CW-D model was developed to estimate the crown width of larch.The data of 1,515 larch trees were collected in Guandi mountain, the northern China. We chose linear function, quadratic function, and other form of base functions to develop the CW models, and we introduced non-linear least squares techniques (NLS), non-linear mixed-effect (NLME), and Bayesian method in modeling process. Because the data was from different plot, we added a plot level random effect in NLME method to predict the effect from environment. For equally comparing the Bayesian method with the NLME, we also added the plot level random effect to the Bayesian MCMC procedure. We selected Akaike's information criterion and logarithm likelihood to evaluate NLS and NLME models, and chose deviance information criterion and stationary test to test Bayesian method. These methods had another three same indicators (the determination coefficient, root mean square error, and mean absolute deviation) in model evaluation.Heteroskedasticity wasn't occurred in this study. The model I.2 (quadratic formula) showed a best fitting effect in each method, and Bayesian method with random effect was slightly superior than other methods. Therefore, the selected final model was quadratic function by Bayesian method with plot level random effect, this combination had the highest prediction accuracy in the larch trees' crown width estimation of Guandi mountain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝叶斯法与经典法在中国北方鲁普雷希特王子落叶松冠幅建模中的比较
冠幅(CW)是树木生长的一个重要变量,但测量冠幅既费力又费时。胸径(D)是预测冠幅的常用生长变量。本文建立了一个 CW-D 模型来估计落叶松的冠幅。我们选择了线性函数、二次函数和其他形式的基函数来建立 CW 模型,并在建模过程中引入了非线性最小二乘法(NLS)、非线性混合效应(NLME)和贝叶斯方法。由于数据来自不同的地块,我们在非线性混合效应方法中加入了地块水平随机效应,以预测环境的影响。为了将贝叶斯方法与 NLME 方法进行平等比较,我们还在贝叶斯 MCMC 程序中加入了地块水平随机效应。我们选择了 Akaike 信息准则和对数似然来评价 NLS 和 NLME 模型,选择了偏差信息准则和静态检验来检验贝叶斯方法。这些方法在评价模型时还有另外三个相同的指标(判定系数、均方根误差和平均绝对偏差)。在各种方法中,模型 I.2(二次公式)的拟合效果最好,随机效应贝叶斯方法略优于其他方法。因此,最终选定的模型为贝叶斯法的二次函数加地块水平随机效应,该组合对关帝山落叶松冠幅的预测精度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of GM (1,1) to predict the dynamics of stand carbon storage in Pinus Kesiya var. langbianensis natural forests Forest zone and root compartments outweigh long-term nutrient enrichment in structuring arid mangrove root microbiomes Soil amendment mitigates mortality from drought and heat waves in dryland tree juveniles Analysis of mangrove distribution and suitable habitat in Beihai, China, using optimized MaxEnt modeling: improving mangrove restoration efficiency Addressing the altitudinal and geographical gradient in European beech via photosynthetic parameters: a case study on Calabrian beech transplanted to Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1