Tapatybės politika ir literatūrinis kanonas: Sándoro Márai vieta vengrų literatūros kanone

Q3 Arts and Humanities Colloquia Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.51554/coll.24.53.03
Magdalena Garbacik-Balakowicz
{"title":"Tapatybės politika ir literatūrinis kanonas: Sándoro Márai vieta vengrų literatūros kanone","authors":"Magdalena Garbacik-Balakowicz","doi":"10.51554/coll.24.53.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the place of Sándor Márai (1900–1989) in the Hungarian literary canon, specifically, in the context of the discussion on the canon and national identity in the former Eastern Bloc countries after 1989. It draws on the understanding of the canon as a tool used to propagate a certain model of identity within a given society and shows how Márai’s work has been used in socio-political debates at different periods of his career and posthumously. The paper offers a historical perspective and analyses the different stages of Márai’s career: the path to recognition by critics and readers in the 1930s and 1940s, the period of the communist anti-Márai campaign, the period of exclusion from the literary canon, and the great comeback in the 1990s. The paper points to the main aspects that have affected Márai’s reception, and outlines the reasons behind the objections to his oeuvre. The analysis indicates the social, political and historical contexts that affect the different (re)interpretations of Márai’s work and his place in the canon. The paper concludes that, despite the writer’s posthumous literary comeback and international success, his place in the Hungarian literary canon has not been established yet; therefore, it is necessary to take a fresh approach to his work.","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.24.53.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines the place of Sándor Márai (1900–1989) in the Hungarian literary canon, specifically, in the context of the discussion on the canon and national identity in the former Eastern Bloc countries after 1989. It draws on the understanding of the canon as a tool used to propagate a certain model of identity within a given society and shows how Márai’s work has been used in socio-political debates at different periods of his career and posthumously. The paper offers a historical perspective and analyses the different stages of Márai’s career: the path to recognition by critics and readers in the 1930s and 1940s, the period of the communist anti-Márai campaign, the period of exclusion from the literary canon, and the great comeback in the 1990s. The paper points to the main aspects that have affected Márai’s reception, and outlines the reasons behind the objections to his oeuvre. The analysis indicates the social, political and historical contexts that affect the different (re)interpretations of Márai’s work and his place in the canon. The paper concludes that, despite the writer’s posthumous literary comeback and international success, his place in the Hungarian literary canon has not been established yet; therefore, it is necessary to take a fresh approach to his work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身份政治与文学经典:桑多尔-马拉伊在匈牙利文学经典中的地位
本文探讨了 Sándor Márai(1900-1989 年)在匈牙利文学典籍中的地位,特别是在 1989 年后前东欧集团国家关于典籍和国家认同的讨论背景下。论文将正典理解为在特定社会中传播某种身份认同模式的工具,并展示了马拉伊的作品在其职业生涯的不同时期以及死后是如何被用于社会政治辩论的。论文从历史的角度分析了马拉伊职业生涯的不同阶段:20 世纪 30 年代和 40 年代获得评论家和读者认可的道路、共产主义反马拉伊运动时期、被排除在文学典籍之外的时期以及 20 世纪 90 年代的伟大回归。论文指出了影响马拉伊接受度的主要方面,并概述了反对其作品的原因。分析指出,社会、政治和历史背景影响了对马拉伊作品的不同(再)诠释及其在经典中的地位。论文的结论是,尽管这位作家死后在文学上东山再起并在国际上取得了成功,但他在匈牙利文学经典中的地位尚未确立;因此,有必要对他的作品采取新的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colloquia
Colloquia Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kilmingosios raganos atspindys skirtinguose veidrodžiuose: Veronikos iš Desenicės motyvo transformacija slovėnų kultūros kanone Icchokas Meras’ ‘Lygiosios trunka akimirką’ (Stalemate) in the UnequalBattle Against the Censors ,,Tas laisvės troškimas“ (arba Kodėl verta tyrinėti jaunimo subkultūrines grupes) Žurnalo „Дружба народов“ redakcija. Drg. Mero rankraščio aptarimo stenograma. 1963 m. liepos 8 d. The Biography of a Writer as an Argument in (De)Canonisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1