Learning Strategies among Medical Students in a selected University in Sri Lanka

S. Edirisinghe, D. De Silva, H. Dissanayake, S. Yasawardane
{"title":"Learning Strategies among Medical Students in a selected University in Sri Lanka","authors":"S. Edirisinghe, D. De Silva, H. Dissanayake, S. Yasawardane","doi":"10.4038/seajme.v18i1.601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The discipline of medicine is continually changing and evolving, and with it, medical education. It is difficult to develop the attitudes, knowledge, and abilities needed to become a competent physician within a short amount of time. The purpose of this study is to identify and compare the practice of surface, strategic, and deep learning strategies by third-year medical students and students who have passed the final MBBS examination.Methods: The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) – a 52-item questionnaire was given to 138 medical undergraduates at the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura. The ethics review committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura granted ethical clearance for this study (Ref. no. 45/17).Results: The strategic approach was shown to be the most common strategy [78.3%(108/138)] practiced by medical students [Students who completed their final MBBS exams [80.6% (25/31)] and third-year medical students (77.6% (83/107)]. The deep approach was used by 21 (15.2%) individuals and the surface apathetic approach by 9 (6.5%) participants, respectively. Percentage 82.6 (76/92) of females and 69.6% (32/46) of males reported adhering to a strategic approach. A statistically significant difference was not observed in the learning strategies used between the two study populations.Conclusions: The strategic approach was commonly practiced by the study population. The results indicate that deep learning strategies were not utilized among medical undergraduates in their curriculum. Future medical curriculum revisions need to take these findings seriously and develop an instructional design to promote a deep learning approach.","PeriodicalId":233669,"journal":{"name":"South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education","volume":" 62","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/seajme.v18i1.601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The discipline of medicine is continually changing and evolving, and with it, medical education. It is difficult to develop the attitudes, knowledge, and abilities needed to become a competent physician within a short amount of time. The purpose of this study is to identify and compare the practice of surface, strategic, and deep learning strategies by third-year medical students and students who have passed the final MBBS examination.Methods: The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) – a 52-item questionnaire was given to 138 medical undergraduates at the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura. The ethics review committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura granted ethical clearance for this study (Ref. no. 45/17).Results: The strategic approach was shown to be the most common strategy [78.3%(108/138)] practiced by medical students [Students who completed their final MBBS exams [80.6% (25/31)] and third-year medical students (77.6% (83/107)]. The deep approach was used by 21 (15.2%) individuals and the surface apathetic approach by 9 (6.5%) participants, respectively. Percentage 82.6 (76/92) of females and 69.6% (32/46) of males reported adhering to a strategic approach. A statistically significant difference was not observed in the learning strategies used between the two study populations.Conclusions: The strategic approach was commonly practiced by the study population. The results indicate that deep learning strategies were not utilized among medical undergraduates in their curriculum. Future medical curriculum revisions need to take these findings seriously and develop an instructional design to promote a deep learning approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡一所选定大学医学生的学习策略
导言:医学学科在不断变化和发展,医学教育也是如此。要在短时间内培养成为一名合格医生所需的态度、知识和能力是很困难的。本研究旨在确定并比较三年级医学生和已通过 MBBS 最终考试的学生在表层、战略和深层学习策略方面的实践情况:方法:斯里贾耶瓦德勒普拉大学医学科学学院的 138 名医学本科生接受了由 52 个项目组成的 "学生学习方法和学习技巧量表"(ASSIST)问卷调查。斯里贾亚瓦德纳普拉大学医学科学学院伦理审查委员会批准了这项研究(编号:45/17):结果表明,战略方法是医科学生最常用的方法[78.3%(108/138)][完成 MBBS 结业考试的学生[80.6%(25/31)]和三年级医科学生(77.6%(83/107)]]。分别有 21 人(15.2%)和 9 人(6.5%)采用了深层方法和表层冷漠方法。82.6%(76/92)的女性和 69.6%(32/46)的男性表示采用了策略性方法。从统计学角度看,两个研究群体在学习策略上没有明显差异:结论:研究对象普遍采用战略方法。研究结果表明,医学本科生在课程中没有使用深度学习策略。未来的医学课程修订需要认真对待这些研究结果,并制定促进深度学习方法的教学设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simulation vs Video-Assisted Learning on Retentivity of Clinical Competency and Knowledge of Basic Airway Devices in Medical Students: A Preliminary Study Exploring Communication Approaches in Medication Consultations for Generation Z: a Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study of Two-Way and One-Way Methods Smartphone usage among Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery students at the University of Papua New Guinea: A survey The Imperative of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in the South-east Asian (SEA) Region Learning Strategies among Medical Students in a selected University in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1