Authentic Inquiry in Science Education Between 2003 and 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis Use RStudio

Geterudis Kerans, Yayan Sanjaya, Liliasari ‎
{"title":"Authentic Inquiry in Science Education Between 2003 and 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis Use RStudio","authors":"Geterudis Kerans, Yayan Sanjaya, Liliasari ‎","doi":"10.18502/kss.v9i19.16481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary aim of this study is to investigate scholarly literature about the utilization of authentic inquiry in the context of science education throughout the past two decades (2003–2023). Additionally, this analysis aimed to examine the collaborative efforts of authors, institutions, and nations in domains closely associated with this research. Thematic and keyword analyses were performed to discover the most current and up-to-date study topics. The present study reveals 271 scholarly articles about authentic inquiry in science education identified from the SCOPUS database. These articles were sourced from 128 distinct publications, which involved the collaborative efforts of 812 authors. The time frame for this analysis spanned from 2003 to 2023. The annual growth rate observed in this study was 2.98%. Furthermore, the average number of citations per document was 23.62, while the study included 12.479 references cited. In the current context, Yarden from the Weizmann Institute of Science is foremost among the authors, having authored four publications and amassed ninety citations. Furthermore, the aggregate quantity of papers written by individuals from the United States amounts to 116. In addition, Australia is identified as the second most significant contributor, having nine published publications. The theme analysis method is utilized to present a network of thematic keywords consisting of 50 keywords that have been identified as appearing at least four times throughout the text being examined. Based on the bibliometric analysis, the authors propose a need for further enhancement of authentic inquiry research in science education. \nKeywords: authentic inquiry, science education, bibliometric, RStudio","PeriodicalId":17820,"journal":{"name":"KnE Social Sciences","volume":"123 s1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KnE Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i19.16481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary aim of this study is to investigate scholarly literature about the utilization of authentic inquiry in the context of science education throughout the past two decades (2003–2023). Additionally, this analysis aimed to examine the collaborative efforts of authors, institutions, and nations in domains closely associated with this research. Thematic and keyword analyses were performed to discover the most current and up-to-date study topics. The present study reveals 271 scholarly articles about authentic inquiry in science education identified from the SCOPUS database. These articles were sourced from 128 distinct publications, which involved the collaborative efforts of 812 authors. The time frame for this analysis spanned from 2003 to 2023. The annual growth rate observed in this study was 2.98%. Furthermore, the average number of citations per document was 23.62, while the study included 12.479 references cited. In the current context, Yarden from the Weizmann Institute of Science is foremost among the authors, having authored four publications and amassed ninety citations. Furthermore, the aggregate quantity of papers written by individuals from the United States amounts to 116. In addition, Australia is identified as the second most significant contributor, having nine published publications. The theme analysis method is utilized to present a network of thematic keywords consisting of 50 keywords that have been identified as appearing at least four times throughout the text being examined. Based on the bibliometric analysis, the authors propose a need for further enhancement of authentic inquiry research in science education. Keywords: authentic inquiry, science education, bibliometric, RStudio
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2003 年至 2023 年科学教育中的真实探究:使用 RStudio 进行文献计量分析
本研究的主要目的是调查过去二十年(2003-2023 年)在科学教育背景下利用真实探究的学术文献。此外,本分析还旨在研究与本研究密切相关领域的作者、机构和国家的合作努力。我们还进行了专题和关键词分析,以发现最新的研究课题。本研究从 SCOPUS 数据库中发现了 271 篇有关科学教育中真实探究的学术文章。这些文章来自 128 种不同的出版物,涉及 812 位作者的共同努力。本次分析的时间跨度为 2003 年至 2023 年。本研究观察到的年增长率为 2.98%。此外,每篇文献的平均引用次数为 23.62 次,而研究中引用的参考文献次数为 12.479 次。在当前情况下,来自魏兹曼科学研究院的亚登是作者中的佼佼者,他发表了四篇论文,被引用了 90 次。此外,美国个人撰写的论文总数为 116 篇。此外,澳大利亚的贡献位居第二,发表了 9 篇论文。通过主题分析方法,我们发现了一个主题关键词网络,该网络由 50 个关键词组成,这些关键词在所研究的文本中至少出现过四次。根据文献计量分析,作者提出需要进一步加强科学教育中的真实探究研究。关键词:真实探究、科学教育、文献计量学、RStudio
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unlocking Profitability Potential: Investigating the Impact of Social Responsibility, Financial Disclosure, and Good Governance in Islamic Banking in Indonesia Impact of Transportation Network Companies on Conventional Taxi Companies in Indonesia How Public and Private Investment Reduces Poverty: A Case Study of Provinces with Nickel Production in Indonesia Analysis of Customer Satisfaction of Saung Wulan Restaurant Using SERVQUAL Method, Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) and Gap Analysis Development of Sustainability in Accounting - Cognitive and Conceptual Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1