Cultivating Students' Critical Thinking: A Comprehensive Approach with the Integrative Collaborative Problem-solving (ICoPS) Conceptual Model

S. Sujatmika, Mohammad Masykuri, B. Prayitno, Sutarno ‎
{"title":"Cultivating Students' Critical Thinking: A Comprehensive Approach with the Integrative Collaborative Problem-solving (ICoPS) Conceptual Model","authors":"S. Sujatmika, Mohammad Masykuri, B. Prayitno, Sutarno ‎","doi":"10.18502/kss.v9i19.16502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to develop an innovative learning model to cultivate students’ critical thinking skills. The formulated model is anchored in Problem-Based Learning (PBL) principles, a pedagogical approach highly endorsed by experts for its efficacy in enhancing critical thinking abilities. We endeavor to optimize the application of PBL to enhance the overall joyfulness of the learning experience. This research method uses DBR by Reeves, which includes: (1) identifying and analyzing problems by researchers and practitioners in collaboration, (2) development of solutions informed by existing design principles and technology innovation, (3) iterative cycles of testing and refinement of solutions in practice, and (4) reflection to produce “design principles” and enhance solution implementation in practice. Currently, the research is in stage two. In the first stage of DBR, the data were collected using a questionnaire to determine the obstacles to PBL from the teacher’s perspective and diagnostics of students’ critical thinking using tests. In stage two, we used a literature study to provide theoretical support for learning model developers. The research results are a draft of the Integrative Collaborative Problem Solving (ICoPS) learning model. We developed this model from the PBL and Jigsaw methods involving the TPACK approach. ICoPS syntax is a combination of the three constituent contents. ICoPS syntax includes (1) problem orientation, (2) formation of an expert group, (3) Jigsaw discussion, (4) investigation, (5) presenting of findings, and (6) evaluation. The syntax maximizes students’ critical thinking while maintaining ease and practicality when applied in the classroom. \nKeywords: problem-based learning, jigsaw discussion, TPACK, critical thinking","PeriodicalId":17820,"journal":{"name":"KnE Social Sciences","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KnE Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i19.16502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to develop an innovative learning model to cultivate students’ critical thinking skills. The formulated model is anchored in Problem-Based Learning (PBL) principles, a pedagogical approach highly endorsed by experts for its efficacy in enhancing critical thinking abilities. We endeavor to optimize the application of PBL to enhance the overall joyfulness of the learning experience. This research method uses DBR by Reeves, which includes: (1) identifying and analyzing problems by researchers and practitioners in collaboration, (2) development of solutions informed by existing design principles and technology innovation, (3) iterative cycles of testing and refinement of solutions in practice, and (4) reflection to produce “design principles” and enhance solution implementation in practice. Currently, the research is in stage two. In the first stage of DBR, the data were collected using a questionnaire to determine the obstacles to PBL from the teacher’s perspective and diagnostics of students’ critical thinking using tests. In stage two, we used a literature study to provide theoretical support for learning model developers. The research results are a draft of the Integrative Collaborative Problem Solving (ICoPS) learning model. We developed this model from the PBL and Jigsaw methods involving the TPACK approach. ICoPS syntax is a combination of the three constituent contents. ICoPS syntax includes (1) problem orientation, (2) formation of an expert group, (3) Jigsaw discussion, (4) investigation, (5) presenting of findings, and (6) evaluation. The syntax maximizes students’ critical thinking while maintaining ease and practicality when applied in the classroom. Keywords: problem-based learning, jigsaw discussion, TPACK, critical thinking
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养学生的批判性思维:综合协作式问题解决(ICoPS)概念模型的综合方法
本研究旨在开发一种创新的学习模式,以培养学生的批判性思维能力。所制定的模式以 "基于问题的学习"(PBL)原则为基础,这种教学方法因其在提高批判性思维能力方面的功效而得到专家的高度认可。我们努力优化 PBL 的应用,以增强学习体验的整体愉悦感。本研究方法采用里夫斯的 DBR 方法,包括(1) 由研究者和实践者合作发现和分析问题,(2) 根据现有的设计原则和技术创新制定解决方案,(3) 在实践中反复循环测试和完善解决方案,(4) 通过反思产生 "设计原则",并在实践中加强解决方案的实施。目前,该研究处于第二阶段。在 DBR 的第一阶段,我们通过问卷收集数据,从教师的角度确定 PBL 的障碍,并通过测试诊断学生的批判性思维。在第二阶段,我们利用文献研究为学习模式开发人员提供理论支持。研究成果是 "综合协作式问题解决(ICoPS)"学习模式草案。我们从涉及 TPACK 方法的 PBL 和 Jigsaw 方法中开发了这一模型。ICoPS 语法是三个组成内容的组合。ICoPS 语法包括:(1)问题导向;(2)组建专家组;(3)拼图讨论;(4)调查;(5)展示调查结果;(6)评价。该句法既能最大限度地培养学生的批判性思维,又能在课堂上保持简便实用。关键词: 基于问题的学习;拼图式讨论;TPACK;批判性思维
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unlocking Profitability Potential: Investigating the Impact of Social Responsibility, Financial Disclosure, and Good Governance in Islamic Banking in Indonesia Impact of Transportation Network Companies on Conventional Taxi Companies in Indonesia How Public and Private Investment Reduces Poverty: A Case Study of Provinces with Nickel Production in Indonesia Analysis of Customer Satisfaction of Saung Wulan Restaurant Using SERVQUAL Method, Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) and Gap Analysis Development of Sustainability in Accounting - Cognitive and Conceptual Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1