Wind farm structural response and wake dynamics for an evolving stable boundary layer: computational and experimental comparisons

K. Shaler, E. Quon, Hristo Ivanov, J. Jonkman
{"title":"Wind farm structural response and wake dynamics for an evolving stable boundary layer: computational and experimental comparisons","authors":"K. Shaler, E. Quon, Hristo Ivanov, J. Jonkman","doi":"10.5194/wes-9-1451-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The wind turbine design process requires performing thousands of simulations for a wide range of inflow and control conditions, which necessitates computationally efficient yet time-accurate models, especially when considering wind farm settings. To this end, FAST.Farm is a dynamic-wake-meandering-based mid-fidelity engineering tool developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory targeted at accurately and efficiently predicting wind turbine power production and structural loading in wind farm settings, including wake interactions between turbines. This work is an extension of a study that addressed constructing a diurnal cycle evolution based on experimental data (Quon, 2024). Here, this inflow is used to validate the turbine structural and wake-meandering response between experimental data, FAST.Farm simulation results, and high-fidelity large-eddy simulation results from the coupled Simulator fOr Wind Farm Applications (SOWFA)–OpenFAST tool. The validation occurs within the nocturnal stable boundary layer when corresponding meteorological and turbine data are available. To this end, we compared the load results from FAST.Farm and SOWFA–OpenFAST to multi-turbine measurements from a subset of a full-scale wind farm. Computational predictions of blade-root and tower-base bending loads are compared to 10 min statistics of strain gauge measurements during 3.5 h of the evolving stable boundary layer, generally with good agreement. This time period coincided with an active wake-steering campaign of an upstream turbine, resulting in time-varying yaw positions of all turbines. Wake meandering was also compared between the computational solutions, generally with excellent agreement. Simulations were based on a high-fidelity precursor constructed from inflow measurements and using state-of-the-art mesoscale-to-microscale coupling.\n","PeriodicalId":509667,"journal":{"name":"Wind Energy Science","volume":"5 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind Energy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1451-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The wind turbine design process requires performing thousands of simulations for a wide range of inflow and control conditions, which necessitates computationally efficient yet time-accurate models, especially when considering wind farm settings. To this end, FAST.Farm is a dynamic-wake-meandering-based mid-fidelity engineering tool developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory targeted at accurately and efficiently predicting wind turbine power production and structural loading in wind farm settings, including wake interactions between turbines. This work is an extension of a study that addressed constructing a diurnal cycle evolution based on experimental data (Quon, 2024). Here, this inflow is used to validate the turbine structural and wake-meandering response between experimental data, FAST.Farm simulation results, and high-fidelity large-eddy simulation results from the coupled Simulator fOr Wind Farm Applications (SOWFA)–OpenFAST tool. The validation occurs within the nocturnal stable boundary layer when corresponding meteorological and turbine data are available. To this end, we compared the load results from FAST.Farm and SOWFA–OpenFAST to multi-turbine measurements from a subset of a full-scale wind farm. Computational predictions of blade-root and tower-base bending loads are compared to 10 min statistics of strain gauge measurements during 3.5 h of the evolving stable boundary layer, generally with good agreement. This time period coincided with an active wake-steering campaign of an upstream turbine, resulting in time-varying yaw positions of all turbines. Wake meandering was also compared between the computational solutions, generally with excellent agreement. Simulations were based on a high-fidelity precursor constructed from inflow measurements and using state-of-the-art mesoscale-to-microscale coupling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不断变化的稳定边界层的风电场结构响应和尾流动力学:计算与实验比较
摘要风力涡轮机的设计过程需要对各种流入和控制条件进行成千上万次的模拟,这就需要计算效率高且时间精确的模型,尤其是在考虑风电场设置的情况下。为此,FAST.Farm 是美国国家可再生能源实验室开发的一种基于动态尾流的中保真工程工具,旨在准确有效地预测风电场环境下的风力涡轮机发电量和结构载荷,包括涡轮机之间的尾流相互作用。这项工作是基于实验数据构建昼夜循环演化的研究(Quon,2024 年)的延伸。在这里,这种流入被用于验证实验数据、FAST.Farm 仿真结果和风电场应用模拟器(SOWFA)-OpenFAST 工具耦合的高保真大涡流仿真结果之间的涡轮机结构和尾流蜿蜒响应。在有相应气象和风机数据的情况下,在夜间稳定边界层内进行验证。为此,我们将 FAST.Farm 和 SOWFA-OpenFAST 的载荷结果与全规模风电场子集的多涡轮机测量结果进行了比较。叶片根部和塔基弯曲载荷的计算预测结果与 3.5 小时稳定边界层演化过程中 10 分钟应变仪测量统计结果进行了比较,结果基本吻合。这一时期恰逢上游水轮机的主动唤醒转向活动,导致所有水轮机的偏航位置随时间变化。同时还比较了各计算方案之间的尾流蜿蜒情况,结果基本吻合。模拟是基于流入测量数据构建的高保真前兆,并采用了最先进的中尺度到微尺度耦合技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the importance of wind predictions in wake steering optimization On the power and control of a misaligned rotor – beyond the cosine law Identification of electro-mechanical interactions in wind turbines Hyperparameter tuning framework for calibrating analytical wake models using SCADA data of an offshore wind farm Synchronised WindScanner field measurements of the induction zone between two closely spaced wind turbines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1