Unsteady Aerodynamics of Delta Kites for Airborne Wind Energy Under Dynamic Stall Conditions

Wind Energy Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1002/we.2932
I. Castro-Fernández, R. Cavallaro, R. Schmehl, G. Sanchez-Arriaga
{"title":"Unsteady Aerodynamics of Delta Kites for Airborne Wind Energy Under Dynamic Stall Conditions","authors":"I. Castro-Fernández, R. Cavallaro, R. Schmehl, G. Sanchez-Arriaga","doi":"10.1002/we.2932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three unsteady aerodynamic tools at different levels of fidelity and computational cost were used to investigate the unsteady aerodynamic behavior of a delta kite applied to airborne wind energy. The first tool is an in‐house unsteady panel method that is fast but delivers low to mid fidelity predictions. The second tool uses the open‐source CFD code SU2 to solve the unsteady Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes equations with the SST turbulence model. At an intermediate level of fidelity, a semiempirical dynamic stall model that combines the panel method with a phenomenological dynamic stall module is proposed. The latter has free parameters that are fine‐tuned with CFD results from the second tool. The research on the dynamic stall model has been inspired by two flight test campaigns suggesting dynamic stall phenomena possibly driven by the periodic variation of the angle of attack (aerodynamic pitching motion) during crosswind maneuvers. The recorded inflow along the flight path was prescribed in the three aerodynamic tools. As expected, the price to pay for the low computational cost of the panel method is its inability to capture the dynamic stall phenomenon. The results from unsteady CFD qualitatively matched the experimental data identifying a leading‐edge vortex that forms and detaches cyclically during the pitching motion. Using RANS data, the semiempirical tool was fined‐tuned to reproduce the dynamic stall behavior, becoming an accurate and fast aerodynamic tool for coupling with any kite flight simulator. Further discussions on the effects of kite aerostructural deflections are included.","PeriodicalId":506912,"journal":{"name":"Wind Energy","volume":"67 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Three unsteady aerodynamic tools at different levels of fidelity and computational cost were used to investigate the unsteady aerodynamic behavior of a delta kite applied to airborne wind energy. The first tool is an in‐house unsteady panel method that is fast but delivers low to mid fidelity predictions. The second tool uses the open‐source CFD code SU2 to solve the unsteady Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes equations with the SST turbulence model. At an intermediate level of fidelity, a semiempirical dynamic stall model that combines the panel method with a phenomenological dynamic stall module is proposed. The latter has free parameters that are fine‐tuned with CFD results from the second tool. The research on the dynamic stall model has been inspired by two flight test campaigns suggesting dynamic stall phenomena possibly driven by the periodic variation of the angle of attack (aerodynamic pitching motion) during crosswind maneuvers. The recorded inflow along the flight path was prescribed in the three aerodynamic tools. As expected, the price to pay for the low computational cost of the panel method is its inability to capture the dynamic stall phenomenon. The results from unsteady CFD qualitatively matched the experimental data identifying a leading‐edge vortex that forms and detaches cyclically during the pitching motion. Using RANS data, the semiempirical tool was fined‐tuned to reproduce the dynamic stall behavior, becoming an accurate and fast aerodynamic tool for coupling with any kite flight simulator. Further discussions on the effects of kite aerostructural deflections are included.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态失速条件下用于空中风能的三角风筝的非稳态空气动力学
我们使用了三种不同保真度和计算成本的非稳态空气动力学工具来研究应用于机载风能的三角风筝的非稳态空气动力学行为。第一种工具是一种内部非稳态面板方法,速度快,但可提供中低保真度预测。第二种工具使用开源 CFD 代码 SU2,利用 SST 湍流模型求解非稳态雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯方程。在中间保真度水平上,提出了一种半经验动态失速模型,该模型结合了面板法和现象学动态失速模块。后者具有自由参数,可根据第二个工具的 CFD 结果进行微调。对动态失速模型的研究受到了两次飞行试验活动的启发,这两次飞行试验表明,在横风机动过程中,攻角(气动俯仰运动)的周期性变化可能会导致动态失速现象。三种空气动力学工具都规定了沿飞行路径记录的流入量。不出所料,面板法计算成本低的代价是无法捕捉动态失速现象。非稳态 CFD 的结果与实验数据基本吻合,确定了在俯仰运动过程中循环形成和分离的前缘涡流。利用 RANS 数据,对半经验工具进行了微调,以再现动态失速行为,使其成为与任何风筝飞行模拟器耦合的精确而快速的空气动力学工具。此外,还进一步讨论了风筝气动结构挠度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Near Wake Deformation of the X‐Rotor Vertical‐Axis Wind Turbine With Pitched Blades Evaluation of Engineering Models for Large‐Scale Cluster Wakes With the Help of In Situ Airborne Measurements A CFD Study on High‐Thrust Corrections for Blade Element Momentum Models Short‐Term Offshore Wind Power Prediction Based on Significant Weather Process Classification and Multitask Learning Considering Neighboring Powers Wind Tunnel Tests of a Thick Wind Turbine Airfoil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1