Uncovering Reproductive Injustice Toward Women With Disabilities

Laura Pacheco, Coralie Mercerat, Marjorie Aunos, Marie-Marthe Cousineau, A. Goulden, Michelle Swab, Bethany Brenton, Sibusiso Moyo
{"title":"Uncovering Reproductive Injustice Toward Women With Disabilities","authors":"Laura Pacheco, Coralie Mercerat, Marjorie Aunos, Marie-Marthe Cousineau, A. Goulden, Michelle Swab, Bethany Brenton, Sibusiso Moyo","doi":"10.1027/2157-3891/a000103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: For centuries, the reproductive agency of women with disabilities have been challenged and often undermined by informal and formal support networks. Evidence illustrates that women with disabilities face disproportionately higher rates of reproductive violence compared to their nondisabled peers (i.e., long-term contraception or forced sterilization). However, little is known about the specific nature, type, and impact of reproductive violence on women with disabilities. This scoping review examined the literature related to the reproductive violence against women with disabilities. We used Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, and based on our inclusion criteria, 28 empirical articles were included. Most studies were published in the disciplines of health (i.e., nursing and medicine) within the North American context and used qualitative research designs. Main findings within the scoping review included themes related to imposed contraception, rationalization of sterilization, barriers to sexual and reproductive health services, and the discourses underpinning reproductive injustice toward women with disabilities. The findings of the study have implications for future disability community-based research, peer-led supports, practice guidelines for professionals, and intersectoral policy provision aiming at supporting the reproductive agency of women with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":517095,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives in Psychology","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2157-3891/a000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: For centuries, the reproductive agency of women with disabilities have been challenged and often undermined by informal and formal support networks. Evidence illustrates that women with disabilities face disproportionately higher rates of reproductive violence compared to their nondisabled peers (i.e., long-term contraception or forced sterilization). However, little is known about the specific nature, type, and impact of reproductive violence on women with disabilities. This scoping review examined the literature related to the reproductive violence against women with disabilities. We used Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, and based on our inclusion criteria, 28 empirical articles were included. Most studies were published in the disciplines of health (i.e., nursing and medicine) within the North American context and used qualitative research designs. Main findings within the scoping review included themes related to imposed contraception, rationalization of sterilization, barriers to sexual and reproductive health services, and the discourses underpinning reproductive injustice toward women with disabilities. The findings of the study have implications for future disability community-based research, peer-led supports, practice guidelines for professionals, and intersectoral policy provision aiming at supporting the reproductive agency of women with disabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭露生殖领域对残疾妇女的不公正待遇
摘要:几个世纪以来,残疾妇女的生育权一直受到非正式和正式支持网络的挑战和破坏。有证据表明,与非残疾妇女相比,残疾妇女遭受生殖暴力(即长期避孕或强迫绝育)的比例要高得多。然而,人们对生殖暴力的具体性质、类型和对残疾妇女的影响知之甚少。本范围界定综述研究了与针对残疾妇女的生殖暴力相关的文献。我们采用了 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架,根据纳入标准,共纳入了 28 篇实证文章。大多数研究发表于北美地区的卫生学科(即护理和医学),并采用了定性研究设计。范围界定审查的主要发现包括与强制避孕、绝育合理化、性健康和生殖健康服务的障碍以及对残疾妇女的生殖不公正相关的主题。研究结果对未来以残疾社区为基础的研究、同伴支持、专业人员实践指南以及旨在支持残疾妇女生殖机构的跨部门政策规定都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot Study of a Positive Psychology Intervention to Reduce Work-Related Stress Among Service Providers in a Drug Abuse Treatment Clinic Uncovering Reproductive Injustice Toward Women With Disabilities Enacting Reproductive Justice Documenting Reproductive Injustice, Striving for Reproductive Justice Unmet Expectations, Unmet Needs, and Uncertainty–A Qualitative Survey Study of Women Who Described Giving Birth as Traumatic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1