Tensile Coupon Testing and Residual Stress Measurements of High-Strength Steel Built-Up I-Shaped Sections

Kara Stall, Andrea Culhane, Likun Sun, Rachel Chicchi Cross, Matthew Steiner
{"title":"Tensile Coupon Testing and Residual Stress Measurements of High-Strength Steel Built-Up I-Shaped Sections","authors":"Kara Stall, Andrea Culhane, Likun Sun, Rachel Chicchi Cross, Matthew Steiner","doi":"10.62913/engj.v61i3.1326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High strength structural steels (with yield stresses greater than 65 ksi) may have notably different material characteristics when compared to structural steels conventionally used in building construction [i.e., ASTM A992/A992M (2022) or A572/A572M Gr. 50 (2021)]. This paper presents findings from an experimental program that investigated the material characterization of ASTM A656/A656M Gr. 80 (2024) plate steel. The results obtained were compared to conventional ASTM A572/A572M Gr. 50 steel. Two types of testing were performed for this work: tensile coupon testing and residual stress testing. The tensile coupon testing was carried out for both the A656/A656M Gr. 80 and A572/A572M Gr. 50 plate material. The A656/A656M Gr. 80 plate material showed more variation between the two different plate thicknesses in both mechanical behavior and microstructure due to differences in steel production. The 0.375 in. thick plate exhibited a clear yield plateau with an ultimate/yield stress ratio similar to the Gr. 50 material. In contrast, the 0.5 in. plate did not have a yield plateau and reached lower ultimate strain. The residual stress testing was performed using a sectioning technique for one A572/A572M Gr. 50 and five A656/A656M Gr. 80 built-up sections that were fabricated from 0.5 in. and 0.375 in. plate material. Residual stresses obtained from measurements were compared to previously published predictive models. The ECCS model and BSK99 models were found to be reasonable predictors of residual stresses for all specimens except the one section fabricated from 0.5 in. thick Gr. 80 plate. When comparing the Gr. 50 and Gr. 80 specimens of the same cross-sectional geometry, the residual stresses were similar, implying that cross-sectional geometry is more prevalent than the nominal yield stress in determining residual stresses in built-up I-sections.","PeriodicalId":11618,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62913/engj.v61i3.1326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High strength structural steels (with yield stresses greater than 65 ksi) may have notably different material characteristics when compared to structural steels conventionally used in building construction [i.e., ASTM A992/A992M (2022) or A572/A572M Gr. 50 (2021)]. This paper presents findings from an experimental program that investigated the material characterization of ASTM A656/A656M Gr. 80 (2024) plate steel. The results obtained were compared to conventional ASTM A572/A572M Gr. 50 steel. Two types of testing were performed for this work: tensile coupon testing and residual stress testing. The tensile coupon testing was carried out for both the A656/A656M Gr. 80 and A572/A572M Gr. 50 plate material. The A656/A656M Gr. 80 plate material showed more variation between the two different plate thicknesses in both mechanical behavior and microstructure due to differences in steel production. The 0.375 in. thick plate exhibited a clear yield plateau with an ultimate/yield stress ratio similar to the Gr. 50 material. In contrast, the 0.5 in. plate did not have a yield plateau and reached lower ultimate strain. The residual stress testing was performed using a sectioning technique for one A572/A572M Gr. 50 and five A656/A656M Gr. 80 built-up sections that were fabricated from 0.5 in. and 0.375 in. plate material. Residual stresses obtained from measurements were compared to previously published predictive models. The ECCS model and BSK99 models were found to be reasonable predictors of residual stresses for all specimens except the one section fabricated from 0.5 in. thick Gr. 80 plate. When comparing the Gr. 50 and Gr. 80 specimens of the same cross-sectional geometry, the residual stresses were similar, implying that cross-sectional geometry is more prevalent than the nominal yield stress in determining residual stresses in built-up I-sections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高强度钢内置 I 形截面的拉伸试样测试和残余应力测量
高强度结构钢(屈服应力大于 65 ksi)与建筑施工中常用的结构钢[即 ASTM A992/A992M (2022) 或 A572/A572M Gr. 50 (2021)]相比,可能具有明显不同的材料特性。本文介绍了一项实验计划的结果,该计划研究了 ASTM A656/A656M Gr. 80 (2024) 板钢的材料特性。获得的结果与传统的 ASTM A572/A572M Gr. 50 钢进行了比较。这项工作进行了两种类型的测试:拉伸试样测试和残余应力测试。对 A656/A656M Gr. 80 和 A572/A572M Gr. 50 钢板材料都进行了拉伸试样测试。由于钢材生产的不同,A656/A656M Gr. 80 钢板材料在机械性能和微观结构方面的差异较大。0.375 英寸厚的钢板表现出明显的屈服平台,极限/屈服应力比与 Gr.相比之下,0.5 英寸厚的钢板没有屈服高原,极限应变也较低。残余应力测试采用切片技术,对由 0.5 英寸和 0.375 英寸钢板材料制成的一个 A572/A572M Gr. 50 和五个 A656/A656M Gr. 80 构建截面进行了测试。通过测量获得的残余应力与之前公布的预测模型进行了比较。结果发现,ECCS 模型和 BSK99 模型是所有试样残余应力的合理预测模型,只有一个试样是用 0.5 英寸厚的 Gr. 80 板材制造的。在比较横截面几何形状相同的 Gr. 50 和 Gr. 80 试样时,残余应力相似,这意味着横截面几何形状比标称屈服应力更能决定加固 I 型截面中的残余应力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tensile Coupon Testing and Residual Stress Measurements of High-Strength Steel Built-Up I-Shaped Sections Lateral-Torsional Buckling Modification Factors in Steel I-Shaped Members: Recommendations Using Energy-Based Formulations Torsional Design of Round HSS Members— A Critical Review The Adoption of AISC 360 for Offshore Structural Design Practices Steel Structures Research Update: Innovative Steel Deck System for Highway Bridge Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1