Risk perception, policy efficacy, and policy support in earthquake risk management: Empirical insights from South Korea

IF 3.8 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Progress in Disaster Science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100349
Wen Ya Li , Tulsi Paudel
{"title":"Risk perception, policy efficacy, and policy support in earthquake risk management: Empirical insights from South Korea","authors":"Wen Ya Li ,&nbsp;Tulsi Paudel","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the perception of South Korean citizens regarding earthquake risk, their understanding of earthquake management policies, and their evaluation of such policies. The structural relationship between earthquake risk perception, policy efficacy (which is the general audience's understanding of the policy and willingness to participate), and policy support was investigated while exploring the moderating effect of past earthquake experiences. The survey was conducted among 330 South Korean individuals. The responses were analysed using statistical tools such as confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modelling, and multi-group analysis.</p><p>The study revealed that an individual's earthquake risk perception significantly impacts policy efficacy but is unlikely to directly influence policy support. The findings also suggest that individuals who have experienced seismic shockwaves are more likely to perceive earthquake risk and understand earthquake risk mitigation policies. However, an individual's earthquake experience does not significantly impact the relationship between risk perception and policy support.</p><p>This study's findings have implications for understanding the relationship between earthquake risk perception, policy efficacy, and support, as well as for developing effective earthquake risk management strategies in South Korea.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000395/pdfft?md5=b34ca426faa7ce8aa99c414265f03bd6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590061724000395-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the perception of South Korean citizens regarding earthquake risk, their understanding of earthquake management policies, and their evaluation of such policies. The structural relationship between earthquake risk perception, policy efficacy (which is the general audience's understanding of the policy and willingness to participate), and policy support was investigated while exploring the moderating effect of past earthquake experiences. The survey was conducted among 330 South Korean individuals. The responses were analysed using statistical tools such as confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modelling, and multi-group analysis.

The study revealed that an individual's earthquake risk perception significantly impacts policy efficacy but is unlikely to directly influence policy support. The findings also suggest that individuals who have experienced seismic shockwaves are more likely to perceive earthquake risk and understand earthquake risk mitigation policies. However, an individual's earthquake experience does not significantly impact the relationship between risk perception and policy support.

This study's findings have implications for understanding the relationship between earthquake risk perception, policy efficacy, and support, as well as for developing effective earthquake risk management strategies in South Korea.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地震风险管理中的风险认知、政策效力和政策支持:韩国的经验启示
本研究探讨了韩国公民对地震风险的感知、对地震管理政策的理解以及对此类政策的评价。研究了地震风险感知、政策效力(即普通受众对政策的理解和参与意愿)和政策支持之间的结构关系,同时探讨了过去地震经历的调节作用。调查对象为 330 名韩国人。研究显示,个人的地震风险认知会显著影响政策效力,但不太可能直接影响政策支持。研究结果还表明,经历过地震冲击波的个体更有可能感知地震风险并理解地震风险减缓政策。本研究的结果对于理解地震风险认知、政策效力和支持之间的关系,以及在韩国制定有效的地震风险管理战略具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
期刊最新文献
Pastoral and agropastoral community perception of climate change, adaptation strategies and determinant of the choice of adaptation strategies in Guji zone, southern Ethiopia Equity or exclusion? An alternative framework to disaster risks assessment metrics Would've, could've, should've – The role of cognitive and affective appraisal in the judgment of human vs. nature caused disasters Spatio-temporal analysis and Farmer's perception and adaptation practices to cope with agricultural drought in Eastern Province, Rwanda Factors associated with resilience in the context of multiple consecutive disasters: A qualitative study of survivors of World Trade Center, Hurricane Sandy, and COVID-19 disasters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1