Investigating the effectiveness of commercially available mouthwash on SARS-CoV-2 in vivo using viable virus titre as the primary outcome. A randomised controlled trial

D. Seymour, G. Forshaw, M. Porteous, D. Mawer, F. Wiggins, A. Mitchell, C. Hewitt, T. Beetar-King, K.A. Davies, D. Jackson, M.J. Hannah, M. Pitcher, U. Arnold, R. Strachan, M.J. Killip, P. Nixon
{"title":"Investigating the effectiveness of commercially available mouthwash on SARS-CoV-2 in vivo using viable virus titre as the primary outcome. A randomised controlled trial","authors":"D. Seymour, G. Forshaw, M. Porteous, D. Mawer, F. Wiggins, A. Mitchell, C. Hewitt, T. Beetar-King, K.A. Davies, D. Jackson, M.J. Hannah, M. Pitcher, U. Arnold, R. Strachan, M.J. Killip, P. Nixon","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000722.v3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This multi-arm, parallel group, single-blinded randomised controlled trial aimed to assess three commercially available mouthwashes effectiveness against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This manuscript has been written in accordance with the CONSORT statement.\n \n Methods. Eligible participants were SARS-CoV-2 positive with a positive test in the last 72 h. All participants had mild to moderate symptoms and could provide five saliva samples over a 60 min period. Participants delivered a baseline saliva sample and then used a mouthwash as per manufacturer’s instructions. They provided further saliva samples at minute 1, 10, 30 and 60. Participants were randomised to one of four groups; OraWize+, Total Care Listerine, Cool Mint Listerine and water (control). The lab-based research team were blind to the intervention. The research question was: can SARS-CoV-2 be rendered inactive in saliva by using a mouthwash and how long does this effect last? The primary outcome was the amount of viable infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus in the sample, compared to the baseline sample. The secondary outcome measure was the amount of genetic material from the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the sample, measured via PCR testing.\n \n Results. In total 100 participants were recruited (25 per group). Eight participants did not receive the allocated intervention and did not have saliva samples collected. There were no adverse events. In total 42 of the 92 participants had viable virus which could be cultured at baseline. Statistical analysis of the primary outcome was not advised due to the reduced level of viable virus at baseline and the positive skewness present in the distribution of log10(titre) data. Observational data of the primary outcome measure is presented.\n Analysis of the secondary outcome PCR measure showed that there was strong evidence for a decrease in SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels compared to water for all mouthwashes after 1 min, OraWize+ −0.49 (−0.92, –0.05), p-value 0.029, Cool Mint Listerine −0.81 (−1.25, –0.38), p-value<0.001, Total Care Listerine −1.05 (−1.48, –0.62), p-value<0.001. For the remaining timepoints there was generally no evidence of virus level reduction compared to water although there is weak evidence for a decrease at ten minutes using Total Care Listerine −0.44 (−0.88, 0.01), p-value 0.053.\n \n Conclusion. The three mouthwashes included in this trial observationally demonstrated a reduction in virus titre level 1 min after use, with virus levels normalising up to 60 min compared to the control. Although an interesting observation, this result could not be statistically analysed. Using the secondary outcome PCR measure all three included mouthwashes reduced virus levels compared to water at 1 min and these results were statistically significant. Clinically this result does not support the use of the included mouthwashes to reduce SARS-CoV-2 levels in saliva.","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"353 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000722.v3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This multi-arm, parallel group, single-blinded randomised controlled trial aimed to assess three commercially available mouthwashes effectiveness against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This manuscript has been written in accordance with the CONSORT statement. Methods. Eligible participants were SARS-CoV-2 positive with a positive test in the last 72 h. All participants had mild to moderate symptoms and could provide five saliva samples over a 60 min period. Participants delivered a baseline saliva sample and then used a mouthwash as per manufacturer’s instructions. They provided further saliva samples at minute 1, 10, 30 and 60. Participants were randomised to one of four groups; OraWize+, Total Care Listerine, Cool Mint Listerine and water (control). The lab-based research team were blind to the intervention. The research question was: can SARS-CoV-2 be rendered inactive in saliva by using a mouthwash and how long does this effect last? The primary outcome was the amount of viable infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus in the sample, compared to the baseline sample. The secondary outcome measure was the amount of genetic material from the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the sample, measured via PCR testing. Results. In total 100 participants were recruited (25 per group). Eight participants did not receive the allocated intervention and did not have saliva samples collected. There were no adverse events. In total 42 of the 92 participants had viable virus which could be cultured at baseline. Statistical analysis of the primary outcome was not advised due to the reduced level of viable virus at baseline and the positive skewness present in the distribution of log10(titre) data. Observational data of the primary outcome measure is presented. Analysis of the secondary outcome PCR measure showed that there was strong evidence for a decrease in SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels compared to water for all mouthwashes after 1 min, OraWize+ −0.49 (−0.92, –0.05), p-value 0.029, Cool Mint Listerine −0.81 (−1.25, –0.38), p-value<0.001, Total Care Listerine −1.05 (−1.48, –0.62), p-value<0.001. For the remaining timepoints there was generally no evidence of virus level reduction compared to water although there is weak evidence for a decrease at ten minutes using Total Care Listerine −0.44 (−0.88, 0.01), p-value 0.053. Conclusion. The three mouthwashes included in this trial observationally demonstrated a reduction in virus titre level 1 min after use, with virus levels normalising up to 60 min compared to the control. Although an interesting observation, this result could not be statistically analysed. Using the secondary outcome PCR measure all three included mouthwashes reduced virus levels compared to water at 1 min and these results were statistically significant. Clinically this result does not support the use of the included mouthwashes to reduce SARS-CoV-2 levels in saliva.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以存活病毒滴度为主要结果,研究市售漱口水对体内 SARS-CoV-2 的有效性。随机对照试验
这项多臂、平行分组、单盲随机对照试验旨在评估三种市售漱口水对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的有效性。本稿件根据 CONSORT 声明撰写。 研究方法所有参与者均有轻度至中度症状,并能在 60 分钟内提供 5 份唾液样本。参与者提供基线唾液样本,然后按照制造商的说明使用漱口水。他们在第 1、10、30 和 60 分钟时进一步提供唾液样本。参与者被随机分为四组:OraWize+、全面护理李施德林、清凉薄荷李施德林和水(对照组)。实验室研究小组对干预措施视而不见。研究问题是:使用漱口水能否使 SARS-CoV-2 在唾液中失去活性,这种效果能持续多久?主要结果是与基线样本相比,样本中具有传染性的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的存活量。次要结果是通过 PCR 测试测定样本中 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的遗传物质含量。 结果共招募了 100 名参与者(每组 25 人)。八名参与者没有接受分配的干预措施,也没有采集唾液样本。没有发生不良事件。在 92 名参与者中,共有 42 人在基线时培养出了存活的病毒。由于基线存活病毒水平较低,且 log10(滴度)数据分布呈正偏态,因此不建议对主要结果进行统计分析。本报告提供了主要结果的观察数据。对次要结果 PCR 指标的分析表明,有确凿证据表明,与水相比,所有漱口水在 1 分钟后的 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 水平都有所下降:OraWize+ -0.49 (-0.92, -0.05),p 值 0.029;Cool Mint Listerine -0.81 (-1.25, -0.38),p 值<0.001;Total Care Listerine -1.05 (-1.48, -0.62),p 值<0.001。在其余的时间点上,虽然有微弱的证据表明使用全效护理型李施德林在十分钟后病毒水平会下降-0.44 (-0.88, 0.01),p 值为 0.053,但与水相比,病毒水平普遍没有下降的迹象。 结论与对照组相比,本试验中的三种漱口水在使用 1 分钟后病毒滴度水平明显下降,60 分钟后病毒滴度水平恢复正常。尽管这一观察结果很有趣,但无法对其进行统计分析。通过次要结果 PCR 测量,与水相比,所有三种漱口水都能在 1 分钟内降低病毒水平,并且这些结果具有统计学意义。在临床上,这一结果并不支持使用所含漱口水来降低唾液中的 SARS-CoV-2 水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peribacillus simplex and Klebsiella pneumoniae responsible for pyonephrosis with secondary psoas abscess: a case report. Immunogenicity of bivalent versus monovalent mRNA booster vaccination among adult paramedics in Canada who had received three prior mRNA wild-type doses. Virucidal activity of olanexidine gluconate against SARS-CoV-2. Antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance: Knowledge, Attitude and Practices survey of medical students to evaluate undergraduate training curriculum. Validation of an improved reference freeze-dried direct agglutination test for detecting leishmaniasis in the canine reservoir.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1